<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=WikiSysopEn1</id>
		<title>Wikirota - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=WikiSysopEn1"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/Special:Contributions/WikiSysopEn1"/>
		<updated>2026-07-27T21:05:01Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.28.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:GB129059A.pdf&amp;diff=286</id>
		<title>File:GB129059A.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:GB129059A.pdf&amp;diff=286"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:55:59Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:GB128624A.pdf&amp;diff=285</id>
		<title>File:GB128624A.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:GB128624A.pdf&amp;diff=285"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:55:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=284</id>
		<title>LGV Rota Patents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=284"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:47:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The following data are supplied from the European Patent Office ([http://ep.espacenet.com esp@cenet]) database. You can read on line and print free of charge these patents using the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Publication number&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; field of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Advance search&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; screen (ex: FR508472).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the list of the Lgv Rota&amp;#039;s patents found in this database, sorted by application date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 1 No English title available 	  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LOUIS; MILIENNE GEORGES  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  F16C39/06                               IPC: F16C39/06; F16C39/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR508472 - 1920-10-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 2 Apparatus for the Concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point.&lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)  	Applicant: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  H04B13/00                               IPC: H04B13/00; H04B13/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB128624 - 1919-07-03&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 3 Improved Means for Signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines, Submarine or other Ships, &lt;br /&gt;
   Icebergs and other Bodies.  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)   Applicant: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08 	                        IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB129059 - 1919-06-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 4 No English title available   &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08                                IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR536324 - 1922-04-29&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Rota&amp;#039;s notes reference reference a brevet using the Application Number: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #CCCCCC&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Nr !!Patent   !!pdf !! Application date !! Application nbr !! Accepted    !! Complete&amp;amp;nbsp;Accepted/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published&lt;br /&gt;
!Title / Abstract &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1  ||FR508472 || {{ClickPdf|FR508472A.pdf}}|| Oct. 4, 1913     ||                 || 26 Jul 1920 || Oct 13, 1920&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Electro Gravitation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2  ||GB128624 || {{ClickPdf|GB128624A.pdf}} || Aug. 14, 1917    || 11,658/17       ||             || Jul 3, 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparatus for concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3  ||GB129059 || {{ClickPdf|GB129059A.pdf}}  || May 28, 1918     || 8778/18         ||             || June 30 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Improved means for signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines , Submarine or other ships, Icebergs and Other Bodies&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4  ||FR536324 ||{{ClickPdf|FR536324A.pdf}} || May 14, 1919     ||                 || Feb. 9,1922 || Apr 29, 1922&lt;br /&gt;
| French version of the above patent&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; &amp;gt; [[Image:A00057_Brevet508472_1.jpg|thumb|Patent 508.472  page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB128624&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00059_BrevetGB128624_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 128.624  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB129059&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00060_BrevetGB129059_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 129059  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;Fr536324&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00058 BrevetFr536.324 1.jpg|thumb|Patent FR 536.324  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div id=&amp;quot;FR508472&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.. &amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Is there a missing Italian patent ? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00061 BrevetPellegrini p1.jpg |thumb|p1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00062 BrevetPellegrini p2.jpg |thumb|p2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00063 BrevetPellegrini p3.jpg |thumb|p3]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00064 BrevetPellegrini p4.jpg |thumb|p4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00065 BrevetPellegrini p5.jpg |thumb|p5]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Les Brevets de LGV Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:FR508472A.pdf&amp;diff=283</id>
		<title>File:FR508472A.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:FR508472A.pdf&amp;diff=283"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:46:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: WikiSysopEn1 uploaded a new version of File:FR508472A.pdf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:FR508472A.pdf&amp;diff=282</id>
		<title>File:FR508472A.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:FR508472A.pdf&amp;diff=282"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:44:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=281</id>
		<title>LGV Rota Patents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=281"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:42:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The following data are supplied from the European Patent Office ([http://ep.espacenet.com esp@cenet]) database. You can read on line and print free of charge these patents using the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Publication number&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; field of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Advance search&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; screen (ex: FR508472).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the list of the Lgv Rota&amp;#039;s patents found in this database, sorted by application date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 1 No English title available 	  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LOUIS; MILIENNE GEORGES  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  F16C39/06                               IPC: F16C39/06; F16C39/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR508472 - 1920-10-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 2 Apparatus for the Concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point.&lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)  	Applicant: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  H04B13/00                               IPC: H04B13/00; H04B13/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB128624 - 1919-07-03&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 3 Improved Means for Signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines, Submarine or other Ships, &lt;br /&gt;
   Icebergs and other Bodies.  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)   Applicant: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08 	                        IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB129059 - 1919-06-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 4 No English title available   &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08                                IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR536324 - 1922-04-29&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Rota&amp;#039;s notes reference reference a brevet using the Application Number: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #CCCCCC&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Nr !!Patent   !!pdf !! Application date !! Application nbr !! Accepted    !! Complete&amp;amp;nbsp;Accepted/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published&lt;br /&gt;
!Title / Abstract &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1  ||FR508472 || {{ClickPdf|FR508472A.pdf}}|| Oct. 4, 1913     ||                 || 26 Jul 1920 || Oct 13, 1920&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Electro Gravitation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2  ||GB128624 || {{ClickPdf|GB128624A.pdf}} || Aug. 14, 1917    || 11,658/17       ||             || Jul 3, 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparatus for concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3  ||GB129059 || {{ClickPdf|GB129059A.pdf}}  || May 28, 1918     || 8778/18         ||             || June 30 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Improved means for signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines , Submarine or other ships, Icebergs and Other Bodies&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4  ||FR536324 ||{{ClickPdf|FR536324A.pdf}} || May 14, 1919     ||                 || Feb. 9,1922 || Apr 29, 1922&lt;br /&gt;
| French version of the above patent&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #CCCCCC&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Nr !!Patent  !!pdf !! Application date !! Application nbr !! Accepted    !! Complete&amp;amp;nbsp;Accepted/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published&lt;br /&gt;
!Title / Abstract &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1  ||FR508472 || {{ClickPdf|FR508472A.pdf}}|| Oct. 4, 1913     ||                 || 26 Jul 1920 || Oct 13, 1920&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Electro Gravitation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2  ||GB128624 || {{ClickPdf|GB128624A.pdf}} || Aug. 14, 1917    || 11,658/17       ||             || Jul 3, 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparatus for concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3  ||GB129059 || {{ClickPdf|GB129059A.pdf}}    || May 28, 1918     || 8778/18         ||             || June 30 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Improved means for signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines , Submarine or other ships, Icebergs and Other Bodies&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4  ||FR536324 || {{ClickPdf|FR536324A.pdf}} || May 14, 1919     ||                 || Feb. 9,1922 || Apr 29, 1922&lt;br /&gt;
| French version of the above patent&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; &amp;gt; [[Image:A00057_Brevet508472_1.jpg|thumb|Patent 508.472  page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB128624&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00059_BrevetGB128624_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 128.624  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB129059&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00060_BrevetGB129059_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 129059  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;Fr536324&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00058 BrevetFr536.324 1.jpg|thumb|Patent FR 536.324  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div id=&amp;quot;FR508472&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.. &amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Is there a missing Italian patent ? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00061 BrevetPellegrini p1.jpg |thumb|p1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00062 BrevetPellegrini p2.jpg |thumb|p2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00063 BrevetPellegrini p3.jpg |thumb|p3]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00064 BrevetPellegrini p4.jpg |thumb|p4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00065 BrevetPellegrini p5.jpg |thumb|p5]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Les Brevets de LGV Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Template:ClickPdf&amp;diff=280</id>
		<title>Template:ClickPdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Template:ClickPdf&amp;diff=280"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:41:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: Created page with &amp;quot;{{Click|image=Pdf.gif|link=media:{{{1}}}|width=16px|height=16px}}&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Click|image=Pdf.gif|link=media:{{{1}}}|width=16px|height=16px}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=279</id>
		<title>LGV Rota Patents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota_Patents&amp;diff=279"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T22:32:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The following data are supplied from the European Patent Office ([http://ep.espacenet.com esp@cenet]) database. You can read on line and print free of charge these patents using the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Publication number&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; field of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Advance search&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; screen (ex: FR508472).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is the list of the Lgv Rota&amp;#039;s patents found in this database, sorted by application date.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 1 No English title available 	  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LOUIS; MILIENNE GEORGES  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  F16C39/06                               IPC: F16C39/06; F16C39/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR508472 - 1920-10-13&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 2 Apparatus for the Concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point.&lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)  	Applicant: ROTA LUIGI; BINETTI ERNESTO (IT)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  H04B13/00                               IPC: H04B13/00; H04B13/00&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB128624 - 1919-07-03&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 3 Improved Means for Signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines, Submarine or other Ships, &lt;br /&gt;
   Icebergs and other Bodies.  &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)   Applicant: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO (GB)&lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08 	                        IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: GB129059 - 1919-06-30&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 4 No English title available   &lt;br /&gt;
   Inventor: ROTA LUIGI GIOVANNI VALERIO  	Applicant: &lt;br /&gt;
   EC:  G01V3/08                                IPC: G01V3/08; G01V3/08&lt;br /&gt;
   Publication info: FR536324 - 1922-04-29&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/pre&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some Rota&amp;#039;s notes reference reference a brevet using the Application Number: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #CCCCCC&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!Nr !!Patent   !! Application date !! Application nbr !! Accepted    !! Complete&amp;amp;nbsp;Accepted/&amp;lt;br&amp;gt;Published&lt;br /&gt;
!Title / Abstract &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1  ||FR508472 || Oct. 4, 1913     ||                 || 26 Jul 1920 || Oct 13, 1920&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;quot;Electro Gravitation&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2  ||GB128624 || Aug. 14, 1917    || 11,658/17       ||             || Jul 3, 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Apparatus for concentration of Electric Waves in a Single Direction or upon a Fixed Point &lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3  ||GB129059 || May 28, 1918     || 8778/18         ||             || June 30 1919&lt;br /&gt;
|Improved means for signalling the Presence of Explosive Mines , Submarine or other ships, Icebergs and Other Bodies&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;background-color: #EEE&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4  ||FR536324 || May 14, 1919     ||                 || Feb. 9,1922 || Apr 29, 1922&lt;br /&gt;
| French version of the above patent&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; &amp;gt; [[Image:A00057_Brevet508472_1.jpg|thumb|Patent 508.472  page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB128624&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00059_BrevetGB128624_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 128.624  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;GB129059&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00060_BrevetGB129059_1.jpg|thumb|Patent GB 129059  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; id=&amp;quot;Fr536324&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[[Image:A00058 BrevetFr536.324 1.jpg|thumb|Patent FR 536.324  Page 1]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div id=&amp;quot;FR508472&amp;quot;&amp;gt;.. &amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Is there a missing Italian patent ? ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00061 BrevetPellegrini p1.jpg |thumb|p1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00062 BrevetPellegrini p2.jpg |thumb|p2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00063 BrevetPellegrini p3.jpg |thumb|p3]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00064 BrevetPellegrini p4.jpg |thumb|p4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00065 BrevetPellegrini p5.jpg |thumb|p5]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Les Brevets de LGV Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Aero_Radio_Balistique&amp;diff=278</id>
		<title>Aero Radio Balistique</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Aero_Radio_Balistique&amp;diff=278"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T11:50:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[fr:Aero_Radio_Balistique]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Navbar1}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=100%&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;| &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;Sciences fiction or reality? We were not able to find absolute proof that this invention was able to fly.&lt;br /&gt;
What is certain is that this experiment help him to build the &amp;quot;Universal Current&amp;quot; concept.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00010 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|thumb|300px| The AeroBalistique (1914?) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=={{IdTag|IdAeroBalistique}}Did this machine really flied one day of September 1915 ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- In the folowing table, the use of more width attribute is justified because withou them, the &lt;br /&gt;
image is overlaying the text--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| cols=3 width=&amp;quot;650px&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=3 | &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; In the Headlines of &amp;quot;Le Matin&amp;quot; November 15th, 1915&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=3 width=&amp;quot;650px&amp;quot;   |[[Image:A00017 LeMatin15sep1915.jpg|650px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;320px&amp;quot; |[[Image:A00018 LeMatin15sep1915.jpg|left|320px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Spacer}}   &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; witdh=&amp;quot;310px&amp;quot; | &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div width=&amp;quot;310px&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Jules Verne In Action&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Marseille&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 13 September.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;From the special correspondent of “Matin”&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Currently residing in our town an Italian Engineer has made an astounding discovery and that has resolved the problem of holding, absolutely immobile, a body in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Louis Rota - that is his name - has invented an apparatus which triumphs over the law of gravitation and is able to hold immobile in the air at a height of five hundred, six hundred, indeed 1000 metres,  a considerable weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to move this apparatus at a prodigious velocity in any direction and it may be stopped at any point all that, it is understood, without a mechanical motor of any sort, simply by using Hertzian waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle of this invention rests on the special partitioning of  electrostatic and magnetic forces enabling forces of attraction and repulsion sufficient to maintain the apparatus suspended , immobile at a variable height  of 400 to 1000 metres for many hours, forty or more.&lt;br /&gt;
If the wind speed is less than 14 Km/second, the apparatus remains at the same point. In the case that the wind is stronger, the apparatus can rise higher above the wind and remain immobile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Experiments have already been made which have already given results. The other has been made at Marseille with an apparatus in the form of a cigar 4 metres long and 75 cm diameter weighing 95 kilos. It can lift 45 Kilos and remain 24 hours in the air. It moved 200 Kilometres from its point of departure, and could go from Marseille to Paris (653 kilometres in a direct line) in 3 hours and Paris to Turin (585 Kilometres) in two and a quarter hours. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00016 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|300px|Louis Rota in front of his invention ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|Louis Rota in front of his invention&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, we did not find any document related to this event, just this undated picture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rota’s note on the construction “The Aero Radio Ballistique Type C”==&lt;br /&gt;
{{:Production of an Aircraft Insensible to Gravity and Air Resistance}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Aero_Radio_Balistique&amp;diff=277</id>
		<title>Aero Radio Balistique</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Aero_Radio_Balistique&amp;diff=277"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T11:42:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Navbar1}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=100%&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;| &amp;lt;div&amp;gt;Sciences fiction or reality? We were not able to find absolute proof that this invention was able to fly.&lt;br /&gt;
What is certain is that this experiment help him to build the &amp;quot;Universal Current&amp;quot; concept.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00010 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|thumb|300px| The AeroBalistique (1914?) ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=={{IdTag|IdAeroBalistique}}Did this machine really flied one day of September 1915 ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- In the folowing table, the use of more width attribute is justified because withou them, the &lt;br /&gt;
image is overlaying the text--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| cols=3 width=&amp;quot;650px&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot; colspan=3 | &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; In the Headlines of &amp;quot;Le Matin&amp;quot; November 15th, 1915&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| colspan=3 width=&amp;quot;650px&amp;quot;   |[[Image:A00017 LeMatin15sep1915.jpg|650px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;320px&amp;quot; |[[Image:A00018 LeMatin15sep1915.jpg|left|320px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|{{Spacer}}   &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; witdh=&amp;quot;310px&amp;quot; | &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div width=&amp;quot;310px&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Jules Verne In Action&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Marseille&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 13 September.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;From the special correspondent of “Matin”&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Currently residing in our town an Italian Engineer has made an astounding discovery and that has resolved the problem of holding, absolutely immobile, a body in space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Professor Louis Rota - that is his name - has invented an apparatus which triumphs over the law of gravitation and is able to hold immobile in the air at a height of five hundred, six hundred, indeed 1000 metres,  a considerable weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to move this apparatus at a prodigious velocity in any direction and it may be stopped at any point all that, it is understood, without a mechanical motor of any sort, simply by using Hertzian waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle of this invention rests on the special partitioning of  electrostatic and magnetic forces enabling forces of attraction and repulsion sufficient to maintain the apparatus suspended , immobile at a variable height  of 400 to 1000 metres for many hours, forty or more.&lt;br /&gt;
If the wind speed is less than 14 Km/second, the apparatus remains at the same point. In the case that the wind is stronger, the apparatus can rise higher above the wind and remain immobile.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Experiments have already been made which have already given results. The other has been made at Marseille with an apparatus in the form of a cigar 4 metres long and 75 cm diameter weighing 95 kilos. It can lift 45 Kilos and remain 24 hours in the air. It moved 200 Kilometres from its point of departure, and could go from Marseille to Paris (653 kilometres in a direct line) in 3 hours and Paris to Turin (585 Kilometres) in two and a quarter hours. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
{| &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00016 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|300px|Louis Rota in front of his invention ]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|Louis Rota in front of his invention&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately, we did not find any document related to this event, just this undated picture.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rota’s note on the construction “The Aero Radio Ballistique Type C”==&lt;br /&gt;
{{:Production of an Aircraft Insensible to Gravity and Air Resistance}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Aero_Radio_Balistique]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Template:IdTag&amp;diff=276</id>
		<title>Template:IdTag</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Template:IdTag&amp;diff=276"/>
				<updated>2017-02-04T11:35:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;{{{1}}}&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;includeonly&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;{{{1}}}&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/includeonly&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Exp1Schema.png&amp;diff=275</id>
		<title>File:Exp1Schema.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Exp1Schema.png&amp;diff=275"/>
				<updated>2017-01-27T01:05:41Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:B0006.jpg&amp;diff=274</id>
		<title>File:B0006.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:B0006.jpg&amp;diff=274"/>
				<updated>2017-01-27T01:02:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00058_BrevetFr536.324_1.jpg&amp;diff=273</id>
		<title>File:A00058 BrevetFr536.324 1.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00058_BrevetFr536.324_1.jpg&amp;diff=273"/>
				<updated>2017-01-27T00:59:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00037_Block.jpg&amp;diff=272</id>
		<title>File:A00037 Block.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00037_Block.jpg&amp;diff=272"/>
				<updated>2017-01-27T00:57:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=The_Work_of_Louis_Rota&amp;diff=269</id>
		<title>The Work of Louis Rota</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=The_Work_of_Louis_Rota&amp;diff=269"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Les Travaux de LGV Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;**THE UNIVERSAL CURRENTS **&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The work of {{Link|Luigi Giovani Valerio Rota}} 1886-1951 By {{Link|Mike}} &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Introduction==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;text-align:justify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00082 LgvWindTunel.jpg|thumb|rigth|150| L.G.V Rota in a wind tunel]]&lt;br /&gt;
L.G.V. Rota was a Frenchman of Italian origin. He was born 1886 and died in Genesieux near Valence, France in 1951. His early life is relatively unknown. He was involved in early aviation and experiments in wireless communication and also anti-gravitation. He originated in northern Italy and was contemporary with Marconi so that he was almost certainly influenced by his work. Rota wrote little about his discovery: The Universal Current. He produce two short booklets, based on seminars, one in collaboration with a medical Doctor Kresser, and another in which he briefly outlined his work, but with only general details as to how the universal energy he claimed to have discovered was tapped or used. Neither was there any significant theory. However, Rota did discuss his research with one or two confidants, notably a man called Slade who wrote some articles on Rota’s work. Later, after Rota’s death the author visited his laboratory, obtained some of Rota’s laboratory notes and examined some apparatus. Some years later the author met Rota’s son and he showed me apparatus and notes I had not previously seen. Using this data and after many experiments over the years, it has been possible to piece together to some extent a coherent idea of Rota’s discoveries. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00012_Block.jpg|thumb|rigth|180px| A Rota&amp;#039;s block]]  &lt;br /&gt;
Around the time of the end of first world war, Luigi Giovani Valerio Rota discovered a new naturally occurring non-electromagnetic energy which, he claimed, controlled the manifestation of all matter. This energy, which he called the Universal Current, flows some few meters below the earth’s surface. The energy flowing within the earth generates a field in the atmosphere. It was tapped by large buried laminated metallic structures which Rota called blocks. The energy could light lamps, power machines, inhibit electromagnetic propagation such as radio waves and stop or control electromagnetic induction, and also develop antigravity effects and is involved in the life process. Rota maintained that all matter is made of condensed Universal Currents and that any metal could be slowly dissolved releasing the condensed Universal Currents from which it was made. The enormous energy developed during the dissolution of matter could be harnessed. The released energy was not in the form of charged particles but in the form of more Universal Current, which in turn, could be converted into electrical energy. The Universal Current was generally (but not always) harmless and although similar in behavior to electricity it is much more fundamental. Rota understood electricity as a degeneration of the Universal Current. In short, matter is composed of nothing but Universal Current and could be decomposed back into it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Early research== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00010 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|right|thumb|180px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Rota’s early interests seem to have been in aviation and possibly early wireless transmission, but there is no information surviving from this period. At this time (1910-1915) he had a laboratory in Marseilles and it was there that he devised and experimented on several unusual aircraft which finally resulted in what he called the “Stabilisiteur”(a description is given later in this document) which he defined as a device that floats weightless in the air. He claimed:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“The device works by opposing the magnetic and electric field of the earth rendering the device weightless”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This claim would at first sight appear impossible, nevertheless the device worked and later a version was given a public demonstration and [[Aero Radio Balistique#IdAeroBalistique|reported in the press]] at the time. During one of these experiments he touched the Stabilisiteur and received an enormous electric shock which rendered him unconscious for 50 minutes. Rota said that the voltages and currents used in the machine were very small and he could not understand how a potential of such a large magnitude build up. The search for a solution, ultimately lead him to the discovery of the Universal Current. This unknown energy, he thought, had amplified the small electric current used in the machine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:W00006_brevet129069_Sheet_1.jpg|thumb|180px|right|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Around 1910-1918 on the suggestion of one of his teachers Rota seems to have been involved in investigating earth currents. Lord Kelvin had advanced the notion that due to non-uniformities in the earth’s magnetic field earth currents are produced as the earth rotates in its own magnetic field. Rota’s notes of the period show that he thought the telluric currents originated deep within the earth itself and were not external in origin, in short, he had adopted Lord Kelvin’s view. He found that magnetic fields produced by these currents were perturbed by the presence of ships aircraft etc and Rota used this effect to locate the position of ships and aircraft at a distance. He took out patents on the associated apparatus, the text of which is below, and he used a version of it in all his later research. Although he thought that the magnetic disturbances which the apparatus was detecting were caused by telluric currents, around 1923 he started to change his mind. Sometime later he finally decided that the apparatus was detecting a much more fundamental energy of which electromagnetism was a mere byproduct, this energy he called the “Universal Current” because, in his view, it lay at the root of all physical phenomena including the life process. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00052 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|180px|right|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Mt St Aignan Laboratory&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;]]&lt;br /&gt;
Although his first laboratory was in Marseilles in the south of France, from the early 1920’s to the end of the 1930’s Rota had a laboratory in northern France near Rouen at Mont-Saint-Aignan. Around the outbreak of the 2nd world war he moved close to Romans near Valence in the south of France and set up a new laboratory there. Both the Rouen and Romans facilities were quite large. He was evidently quite wealthy, his early work being funded by a family friend and it seems that between the wars on at least one occasion, he was under contract to the French government.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==My Interest== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I became interested in the research of L.G.V. Rota after reading an article on his work in a long defunct popular fringe science journal called the Modern Mystic and Monthly Science Review. The article was entitled &amp;quot;Universal Currents&amp;quot; by a person writing under the pseudonym of Layman. The editor of the Modern Mystic, A.R.Heaver knew Layman. It turned out that Layman was a retired geologist by the name of Slade, who got to know Rota well over the years between the wars, and the three articles in the magazine were an educated layman&amp;#039;s account of the bits and pieces of information that Rota had imparted over this period. These articles are included below. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the author met A.R.Heaver in 1958, the Modern Mystic and Monthly Science review had already been defunct for some ten years. Also both Layman and Rota had died, but Heaver put me in touch with a man who had known Rota since childhood, he also knew most of the people in the area in which Rota had his laboratory. A visit to what remained of Rota’s laboratory was organised and it transpired that some of Rota&amp;#039;s equipment was still fairly intact although some of the equipment had been removed and some dumped in an outhouse used by a local farmer as a shed. I managed to finance the digging up of one of the many metal blocks that Rota had used to tap the universal current, and subsequently brought the block to England for examination. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some 16 years later, out of the blue, I was visited by a Frenchman, Guy Leblond, who knew about L.G.V. Rota and he informed me that Rota had a son. I shortly afterwards met Rota&amp;#039;s son, Daniel Rota in St. Malo in northern France. Daniel Rota was only a small boy when Rota died and he knew that his father had made some important discovery, but not being a scientist he understood little about it. However in the intervening 16 years since I had visited Rota’s laboratory he had brought most or all his father&amp;#039;s papers and laboratory equipment up to his then house in St. Malo . He allowed me to see and photograph the equipment (some of which are shown below). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometime later Guy Leblond unexpectedly visited me with a piece of Rota equipment I had not previously seen. Leblond said this was called the &amp;quot;Transducteur&amp;quot;. I had not been shown it previously because Daniel Rota believed it as containing Rota&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;secret&amp;quot; regarding the universal current. It seems that the in part Transducteur amplified the Universal Current sufficiently so that they could heard without electronic aid, since Rota invariably used headphones and even galvanometers to detect the Universal Current.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Background== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Natural electric currents called telluric currents were well known to 19th century scientists. These electric currents are due to induction from disturbances of the earth’s magnetic field caused by solar flares and storms. Magnetic storms induced quite heavy electric currents in the earth’s surface which, while they lasted, blocked telegraph transmission. The sensitivity of the apparatus of the time to disturbance was due to the use of an earth return in the telegraph circuit. The earth return consisted of large buried metal plates one at each end of the circuit. The telegraph circuits stretched sometimes 100 Km in length and consequently magnetic fluctuations due to solar magnetic storms would induce currents in the overhead wires causing spurious telephone/telegraph signals. Magnetic devices such as electrical transformers relays etc. would saturate. On some occasions the electric currents would reach formidable levels. It is likely that the disturbing currents which existed in telephone wires and the rather strange behaviour of these disturbances interested Rota and lead to his research. This is not unknown today [Facts|1].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Zenneck_Surface_Wave&amp;diff=271</id>
		<title>Zenneck Surface Wave</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Zenneck_Surface_Wave&amp;diff=271"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;*;Who is Zenneck?:  a German physicist (April 15, 1871 - April 8, 1959). [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Zenneck More about Jonathan Zenneck]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Is the Universal Current a Zenneck Wave?]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Internet Links About Zeneck == &lt;br /&gt;
*; [http://www.tfcbooks.com/articles/tws4.htm Rediscovering the Zenneck Surface Wave]: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*; http://web.mit.edu/redingtn/www/netadv/zenneck.html&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestSVG1&amp;diff=265</id>
		<title>TestSVG1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestSVG1&amp;diff=265"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:TEST2.SVG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:TEST2.SVG|200px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:TEST2.SVG|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-   &lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=3|[[Image:TEST2.SVG|800px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=The_Rota%27s_Effect&amp;diff=267</id>
		<title>The Rota&#039;s Effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=The_Rota%27s_Effect&amp;diff=267"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:L&amp;#039;effet Rota]] &lt;br /&gt;
A [[Mike Watson]] experiment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The experience ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00029 SchemaRecorder.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Notes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# Some ground produces nothing except 50Hz hum. &lt;br /&gt;
# To work without a cassette recorder, either the metal probe or a metal block connected in series with the probe needs activating. I do not know how to do this activation. Your father had a method which he kept secret. His portable block with the Roman numerals on was used as an amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
# The current indicators in Louis Rota’s note book such as +9 IV 46 V+ etc. are reactions on the potable block. The IV is the number of the plug on the block box. 9 is probably the number of reactions heard in the headphone.&lt;br /&gt;
# The currents pulse in a rhythmic manner.&lt;br /&gt;
# Did Louis Rota use any electronic amplifiers? Probably not.&lt;br /&gt;
# The oscilloscope pictures above are taken from the cassette recordings. There is a background of 50 Hz which requires filtering out. It was probably for this reason that your father moved from Rouen to Genessieux&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestPage&amp;diff=261</id>
		<title>TestPage</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestPage&amp;diff=261"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;|[[Image:exp1Schema.svg |100px|]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestSVG&amp;diff=263</id>
		<title>TestSVG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=TestSVG&amp;diff=263"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Submarine_Document&amp;diff=257</id>
		<title>Submarine Document</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Submarine_Document&amp;diff=257"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
== The document ==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
This seven manuscript was written in 1917 by Louis Rota. A first glance, it looks to be a detailed operator guide related to the [[LGV Rota Patents| patent GB129059 ]], but in fact it brings more questions than responses….&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00066 SousMarin 1.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00067 SousMarin 2.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00068 SousMarin 3.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00069 SousMarin 4.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00070 SousMarin 5.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00071 SousMarin 6.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00072 SousMarin 7.jpg|100px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
== The translation ==&lt;br /&gt;
This is a very poor word-to-word translation from Italian to French. We hope that somebody will show mercy and help us to correct the many mistakes, as well as to decipher some wording of the manuscript (noted (..?)).  The XXXX as well as the numbers ( ex (24),(25) replace expressions that are not yet associated to an image. They represent the setting (or  current name?) of the detector.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Page 1=== &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Compimento per l’azione della segnalazione dei sottomarini a distanze varie = tanto a fior d’acqua come nell’acqua=&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Complément pour la détection des sous-marins à distances diverses tant en surface qu’en plongée.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Nella determinazione della trasmissione (come direttamente per la ricezione) va tento conto d’effetti e cause tutto affatto speciali, che nessuno ancora ne fece oggetto, oppure si sorvola leggermente su qualche punto la questione, che hanno già (detti affetti e cause) un buon valore nella T.S.F comune, se venissero considerati;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dans la détermination de l’émission (comme la réception)  il faut tenir compte d&amp;#039;effets et causes particuliers qui n’ont ‘a pas encore fait l’objet d’études,  ou sont considérés très superficiellement comme une propriété de T.S.F. ordinaire.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;mentre poi nel nostro caso hanno una grandissima importanza e valore per il lavoro che volsi intraprendere e direttamente  per ottenere ottimi e precisi risultati.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Cependant, dans notre cas j’obtiens directement des résultats optimum et précis d’une très grande importance pour  nos recherches.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; &amp;gt;(Tenendo,avanti tutto,conto che la trasmissione e ricezione viene da una mare all&amp;#039;altro, quindi submare, noi già conosciamo nella comune T.S.F, facilita molto la portata, sebbene questo sia cosa di minore considerazione,molto più da considerare invece, quando si fa detto lavoro tra una nave e terra e viceversa)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(Retenons, avant  tout, que la transmission et la réception mer - mer, facilite beaucoup la portée comme pour les ondes radio. Cette considération est mineure  en mer, mais devient plus importante  dans les travaux réalisés entre un bateau et la terre)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dunque, tanto per il lavoro a fiore d&amp;#039;acqua come nell&amp;#039;acqua si deve osservare attentamente quanto sotto indicato e tenere conto dei modi di risoluzioni in ogni singolo caso.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Donc, aussi bien pour le travail en en surface qu’en plongée, on doit observer attentivement  les baisses de valeurs et tenir compte des modalités de résolution dans chaque cas.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Va tenuto conto se nel tempo che si compie l&amp;#039;esperienze (o lavoro in questione) sé giorno o notte, tempo sereno o burrascoso ect.. e per tale causa  [[Image:B0001.jpg|150px|]] [[Image:B0002.jpg|130px|]] oppure [[Image:B0003.jpg|300px|]]  e fare all&amp;#039;uopo un prolungamento nel [[Image:B0004.jpg|150px|]] e [[Image:B0005.jpg|70px|]] sarà sempre in un minimum d’un [[Image:B0006.jpg|100px|]],[[Image:B0007.jpg|350px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Il doit être tenu compte si l’expérience ( ou le travail en question) est réalisée de jour ou de nuit, par temps calme ou agité, etc.  .. Pour cette raison, [[Media:B0001.jpg|(1)]] [[Media:B0002.jpg|(2)]] ou bien [[Media:B0003.jpg|(3)]] fera au besoin une prolongation dans le [[Media:B0004.jpg|(4)]] et [[Media:B0005.jpg|(5)]]sera toujours dans un minimum d’un [[Media:B0006.jpg|(6)]][[Media:B0007.jpg|(7)]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Se il mare e in marea di crescenza o decrescenza: e per questo [[Image:B0008.jpg|170px|]] al [[Image:B0009.jpg|130px|]] rispetto al suo [[Image:B0010.jpg|150px|]], [[Image:B0011.jpg|60px|]], puramente, perché la marea oltre tutti i motivi che determinano tale fenomeno, n’è pure il motivo o causa [[Image:B0012.jpg|200px|]], [[Image:B0013.jpg|170px|]] [[Image:B0014.jpg|170px|]]   di [[Image:B0015.jpg|70px|]] ( e per il momento lascio a parte il [[Image:B0016.jpg|150px|]]  di  [[Image:B0017.jpg|120px|]])&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; align=&amp;quot;left&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Si la mer est en marée montante ou  descendante et pour cela [[Media:B0008.jpg|(8)]]au [[Media:B0009.jpg|(9)]] par rapport à son [[Media:B0010.jpg|(10)]], [[Media:B0011.jpg|(11)]], simplement parce que la marée parmi toutes les raisons qui déterminent un tel phénomène, n&amp;#039;est pas le seul motif ou cause : [[Media:B0012.jpg|(12)]],[[Media:B0013.jpg|(13)]] [[Media:B0014.jpg|(14)]]de [[Media:B0015.jpg|(15)]] (et pour l&amp;#039;instant je laisse de coté le [[Media:B0016.jpg|(16)]] de [[Media:B0017.jpg|(17)]])&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 2 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;In questo terzo effetto veniamo alla considerazione d’un (18) e se ciò è massimamente per le grandi distanze, tuttavia non e di minore considerazione anche per le piccole distanze perciò (19) quindi si ora il (20) in modo d&amp;#039;avere (21) perciò il primo cilindro della stazione (22)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Dans ce troisième effet nous considérerons un (18); s’il est d’une extrême  importance  pour les grandes distances, it n&amp;#039;est toutefois pas de mineure considération même pour les petites distances donc (19); on aura de ce fait le (20) en mode de reception (21)donc le premier cylindre de la station (22) &amp;lt;font color=&amp;quot;red&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(?????)&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Come s&amp;#039;é detto (23)  si può fare le stesse osservazioni per quanto riguarda la (24) dedotta la differenza del  (25), partendo dalla base, (o principio) che questi siano con o senza (26) la propria (27), quindi s’arriane (?) di (28) di (29) con o (30)si definirà la questione come l’avere un (31)sopraccitato; se poi invece e (32), allora bisognerà (33), venendo a considerare che questi influisce molto a (34) ed (35), quindi si guarda di prendere ma posizione ambigua ed (36) il (37) del (38) al più possibile (39) di (40), ed (41) il (42) del (43) al più possibile (44) di (45), ed (46)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Comme je l‘ai dit (23) on peut faire les mêmes observations en ce qui concerne la (24)déduite de la différence du (25), en partant de la de base, (ou du principe) que ceux-ci soient avec ou sans (26) son propre (27), donc &amp;lt;font color=red&amp;gt;??s’arriane??&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;de (28) de (29) avec (30) se posera la question comment avoir un (31)  déjà cité; si ensuite par contre on a (32), alors il faudra (33), en venant à considérer que ceux-ci influent beaucoup le (34) et (35), donc on se regardera de prendre une position ambiguë et (36)le (37) du (38)au plus possible (39) de (40) et de (41) le (42) du (43) probablement (44) de (45) et de (46)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Sui medesimi principi sopra citati n’è una uguaglianza quando sé in periodo di (47), ed in ciò si deve tener conto che questi sono della (48) del (49) ed hanno (51); credo perciò superfluo il prolungarmi, basta osservare la (52)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Avec les mêmes principes cités plus haut,  il y a une  égalité quand il s&amp;#039;agit d&amp;#039;une période de (47) et dans cela on doit tenir compte que ceux-ci sont du (48) du (49); je crois donc qu’il est superflu me m’étendre, il suffit d’observer la (52)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 3 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;E bene osservare i  (53) ove si (54) se sé in (55) di (56) od in (57), di (58). Ora come si detto sulla superficie dell’acqua si posso definire le medesime  osservazioni  (per  gioendo ?) si fa l’azione dentro l’acqua senza differenza di profondità. Per questo la vero e bene osservare molto (59) quindi (60) il (61) nel suo massimo e tutto (62) nel (63); perciò si fa presto dedurre l’effetto e conseguenze, perciò nel (62) e viceversa nel (63) e in più (64) la (65) dei (66) tutto(67). &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Et bien observer (53)  où (54) s’il est dans (55) de (56) ou dans (57) de (58). Maintenant je dis que sur la superface de l&amp;#039;eau on peux définir les mêmes observations (pour gioendo ?) on fait l&amp;#039;action dans l&amp;#039;eau sans différence de profondeur. Pour ceci le but et bien d&amp;#039;observer beaucoup (59) donc (60) (61) dans son maximum et tout (62) dans (63) ; on peux vite séparer l&amp;#039;effet et la conséquences, donc dans la (62) et viceversa dans (63) et dans plus (64) (65) de (66) tout (67).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Vi é ancora da osservare  XXXXX,XXXX si può XXXXX XXXXXX con XXXXXXXX od di &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Vous venez encore d’observer xxxxx xxxxx&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 4 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(tutto questo ben inteso rispettivamente alla faccia dei XXXX e XXX di XXXX;) e si può comprendere come si deve comportarsi per non avere l’azione distrutta o neutralizzata. Ora poi  vi sarebbe ancora da considerare la possibilità d’usufruire del massimo rendimento dell’apparecchio, perciò XXXXXX dia contemporaneamente un ottima azione, un minimo di consumo del XXXXXXX, perciò si può fare uso del metallo che il secondo cilindro concentrico va finire nel cilindro et reliè alla terra (V. ?) In seguito poi sarebbe bene di provare due specie:&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;(tout ceci lui bien entendu respectivement vrai pour XXXX et XXX de XXXX) et on peut comprendre comment se comporter pour ne pas avoir l&amp;#039;action détruite ou neutralisée. Maintenant  il y aurait encore à considérer profiter d’un plus grand rendement de l’appareil ;  car  XXXXXX donne à la fois d’excellentes actions(?), car  il est possible d’employer le métal du  second cylindre concentrique finissant dans le cylindre  relié à la terre (V. ?). Il serait ensuite intéressant de démontrer deux particularités:&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a) XXXXXX formato con la XXXXXXXXX ad una parte di XXXXXX  di XXXXX va finire nel XXXXXXX, nel  1 o 2:XXXXX a secondo il  XXXXXXXXXXX di XXXXX&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;a) XXXXXX forme avec le XXXXXXXXX à une partie de XXXXXX de XXXXX va finir dans le XXXXXXX, dans le XXXXXXXXX  un second XXXXXX de  XXXXXXXXXXX&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;2) Fare l’azione in questione, puramente facendo agire l’apparecchio XXXXXXX come un semplice XXXXXXXX ben inteso solo sul mare si può fare tale prova ultima detta.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;b) Produire l’action en question, simplement faire agir l‘appareil comme  un simple XXXXXXX. Bien entendu, il n&amp;#039;est possible de prouver ceci que sur la mer.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 5 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Recezione&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Ricezione):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nelle rispettive dimensioni, forme ect,  non differenzia per nulla al dispositivo  di trasmissione, ben inteso la diversità esiste puramente nella reversibilità dei relativi trasformatori, e l’ultima induzione, con un XXXXXX, anche poi finire che il medesimo ultimo cilindro a potrebbe avere una trasformazione diretta sul sistema,  dimodoché (?) che poi questa a mezzo d’un relativo condensatore a reglage, e soccorritore (relais) farebbe funzionare il galvanometro (ore altro strumento indicatore ) e dalla differenza, si viene definire l’azione ossia la presenza del sottomarino, in movimento ect.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Réception:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
Les dimensions respectives, formes ect, ne changent en rien le dispositif de transmission ; bien entendu la diversité existe seulement dans la réversibilité des transformateurs relatifs et la dernière induction, avec un XXXXXX, sur le dernier cylindre  pourrait avoir une transformation dirigée vers le système, C’est au moyen d&amp;#039;un   condensateur variable, d’un  relais faisant fonctionner le galvanomètre (ou tout autre instrument de mesure) et de la différence que l’on vient définir l&amp;#039;action,  c&amp;#039;est-à-dire la présence du sous-marin, mouvement ect. &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Invece poi di ammetterò l’unione per induzione (....?) , preferibilmente potrebbe ammettersi quest’ultima(.....?)  in derivazione unita al sistema direttamente per la trasmissione.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Par contre, on doit admettre  l&amp;#039;union pour induction (…… ?) , pourrait s&amp;#039;admettre préférablement cette dernière (…. ?) en dérivation unie au système directement pour la transmission.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 6 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Determinazioni generali e sommarie, per il progetto d’une esperienza in piccola distanza e forza, cioè per ma distanza da mare a mare di 150-200 m.Stazione di trasmissione:Cilindri 4 = trasformatori 3, (senza ave tenuto conto del 4 qualora si ammetta in unione diretta con il sistema di trasmissione = dico diretta per dire l’unione fatta per derivazione=Cilindri =a1 =a2=a3=a4 = trasformatori t1,t2,t3 – l= lunga.(..?)  D. diametre5650, IV VI VI IV V IV VI= 53w&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Déterminations générales et sommaires, pour le projet d&amp;#039;unes expérience en petite distance et force, c&amp;#039;est-à-dire distance de mer / mer de 150-200 m.Stazione de trasmissione:Cilindri 4 = transformateurs 3, (sans avé tenu compte du 4 qualora s&amp;#039;admette en union dirigée avec le système de transmission = dis dirigée pour dire l&amp;#039;union faite pour derivazione=Cilindri = a1 = a2=a3=a4 = transformateurs t1, t2, t3 – l=longueur. D. Diametre5650, IV VI VI IV V IV VI= 53w&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;N.B. Tutte le misure e determinazioni sono conforme ad un calcolo approssimativo perché ad esempio i trasformatori; numero precise di spire est non si può definir con un assoluta precisione, fino quanto si ha il rate preciso del potenziale e frequenza dell’ apparecchio trasmettitore; così pure poi l’ammissione  o non ammissione de condensatori  ect, solo dopo tali dati definizioni assolute si puro definire all’uopo di quest’ultimo ciò condensatore (?) &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Note.Toutes les mesures et les déterminations sont conforme à un calcul approximatif parce que, par exemple pour les transformateurs, le nombre précis de spires ne peut se définir avec une absolue précision que lorsque l’on connaît les valeurs précises du potentiel et de la fréquence du transmetteur.  L’ajout ou non de  condensateurs est déterminé après la connaissance absolue de ces données. LA1 XXXXXXX. A2 :XXXXXXXXXA3 XXXXXXXXXA4:XXXXXXXXXX&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Si deve osservare quest’ultimo,come si moto nella prima paste di detta descrizione per far fronte alle cause diretto ed indiretto che può avene danno XXXXXXXQuanto al diametro, questo e determinato nell’uso d’un solo cilindro, ben intero qualora s’usa un sistema (..?)  che porta un cilindro concentrico questo cambierà di motto pero XXXXXXXXXXXX d’ogni singolo cilindro.D=D1 XXXXXXXX D2=XXXXXXXXXXXXX D3=XXXXXXXXXXXXXD4= XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Trasformatori, l sara (?)  (...?) XXXXXXXXXXX Qualora poi come sé detto sopra che s’ammetta un sistema con il relative cilindro interno l’interspazio a ossia la di = stanza da un cilindro all’altro sara sempre d’un minimum di XXXXXXXXXPer quanto riguarda l’ammissione delle singole batterie d’accumulatori o pile ect devessere ben definita e regolata cioè vale a dire che questo non venga dare un effetto di reattanza al sistema didamoche non solo renderebbero a neutralizzare l’azione del dispositivo, ma invece molto più impedire la medesima regolare  trasmissione.LA1 XXXXXXX. A2 :XXXXXXXXXA3 XXXXXXXXXA4:XXXXXXXXXX&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;On doit observer ce dernier …. (?), Quand au diamètre, il est déterminé par l’emploi d&amp;#039;un seul cylindre, en bonne condition  qualora on emploie un système (.. ?) qu&amp;#039;il porte un cylindre concentrique qui sera remplacer   XXXXXXXXXXXX de chaque cylindre.. ( ?),,D=D1 XXXXXXXX D2=XXXXXXXXXXXXXD3 =XXXXXXXXXXXXXD4= XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Transformateurs  ( ?)Comme je l’ai dit,(?) on utilisera un system avec un cylindre (relatif?) interne, c’est a dire   ...L’espace d’un cylindre à l’autre sera toujours d’un minimum de 53=N5+VI IV V i=9 i+95En ce qui concerne l&amp;#039;admission des batteries individuelles d&amp;#039;accumulateurs ou de piles ect, elles devront être bien réglées pour ne pas qu’elles introduisent un effet de réactance au système, ce qui non seulement neutralisera l&amp;#039;action du dispositif, mais pourrait  beaucoup plus empêcher  une transmission régulière&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Page 7 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Italian&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot; valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;&amp;gt;French&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;In linea generale queste devono dare, dedotte le resistenze del relativo circuito delle batterie, in media ma corrente in Watt, D’un minimo ad un massimo della XXXXXX;  ed in principe occorre un’attenzione tutt’affatto speciale e particolare quando n’è nel circuito del dispositivo. Resta poi sott’inteso che le singole resistenze delle batterie sono variabile, dimodochè si può determinare, o cambiare la potenza (in Watt) della corrente.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;En ligne générale celles-ci doivent donner, déduites les résistances du relatif circuit des batteries, un courrant moyen en Watt d&amp;#039;un minimum et d’un maximum de XXXXXXX; et par principe il faut une attention tout à fait spéciale au circuit du dispositif. Il reste ensuite sous-entendu que les résistances individuelles des batteries étant variables la puissance  du courant (en Watt) peut changer. &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Trasmettitore od eccitatore Questo, ha dato già un principio di base per definire le relative grandezze  dei cilindri sopraccitati; questo sarà (o come sé preso per  base) d’una potenza d’un KWT. minimum, e la bobina addebiterà pur una media da 4 -5 amp.; ben inteso è poi molto meglio farne la relativa (trasmissione)  di unioni indiretta, come si parlo piu  ???..&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Transmetteur ou excitateur.J’ai déjà donné déjà un principe de base pour de définir des relatives grandeurs des cylindres ceci sera (ou comme lui pris pour de base) d&amp;#039;une puissance d&amp;#039;un KWT.minimum, et il bobine débitera aussi une moyenne de 4 -5 amp. ; bien entendu,  il est ensuite préférable de  faire la relative (transmission)d&amp;#039;unions indirecte, comme on parle piu ???????????????????.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Trasformatori Questi per la rispettiva definizione, oltre dopo conosciuta l’alternanza, del’il potenziale dell’ apparecchio di trasmissione, e molto bene, per tale determinazione, (nella possibilità) fare una prova dell’ apparecchio trasmettitore con XXXXXXXXX, con XXXXXXXXXXXXXX; da ciò si può XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX; da ciò sé pure per base per determinare quale sarà l’efficienza del 1er trasformatore, ed in generale nel primo a1, s’ aumenta un po l’intensità nel secondo s’equilibra le fase, con i terzo della data del massimo del potenziale e rendimento dell’apparecchio o dispositivo.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;td valign=top&amp;gt;Transformateurs.Ceux pour la respective définition, au-delà d&amp;#039;après connue l&amp;#039;alternance, du potentiel de l‘appareil de transmission, et aussi bien, pour telle détermination, (dans c’est possible ) faire un test et  préparer le transmetteur avec XXXXXXXXX, avec XXXXXXXXXXXXXX ; et s’il se  peut XXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX ; Cela l&amp;#039;aussi  pour déterminer qu’elle sera l&amp;#039;efficacité du 1er transformateur, (….. ?) on augmente un peu l&amp;#039;intensité dans la seconde on équilibre la phase, avec troisième de donnée du maximum du potentiel et rendement d……( ?)&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Code ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
| 1|| [[Image:B0001.jpg]] &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2|| [[Image:B0002.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3|| [[Image:B0003.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 4|| [[Image:B0004.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5|| [[Image:B0005.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 6|| [[Image:B0006.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 7|| [[Image:B0007.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 8|| [[Image:B0008.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 9|| [[Image:B0009.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|10|| [[Image:B0010.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|11|| [[Image:B0011.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|12|| [[Image:B0012.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|13|| [[Image:B0013.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Détection sous-marine]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Telemobiloscope&amp;diff=259</id>
		<title>Telemobiloscope</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Telemobiloscope&amp;diff=259"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[fr:La naissance du Radar]]&lt;br /&gt;
==The Huelsmeyer&amp;#039;s telemobiloscope==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:O001RadarWorld_Hradar1.jpg | Image borrowed from http://www.radarworld.org/huelsmeyer.html]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{CopyFrom|From=http://www.radarworld.org&lt;br /&gt;
|Link=http://www.radarworld.org/huelsmeyer.html&lt;br /&gt;
|Text=On the 30th April 1904, Christian Huelsmeyer in Düsseldorf, Germany, applied for a patent for his &amp;#039;telemobiloscope&amp;#039; which was a transmitter-receiver system for detecting distant metallic objects by means of electrical waves. The telemobiloscope was designed as an anti-collision device for ships and it worked well.&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Rota%27s_lamps&amp;diff=255</id>
		<title>Rota&#039;s lamps</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Rota%27s_lamps&amp;diff=255"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Lampes de Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Blocks used to power the Rota&amp;#039;s lamps==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00013 BlockLampe.jpg|380px|]] &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00019 BlockLamp.jpg |155px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00020 BlockLamp.JPG |225px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|[[Media:A00013 BlockLampe.jpg|Block NPR]]&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|[[Media:A00019 BlockLamp.jpg|Block SPR]]&lt;br /&gt;
|align=&amp;quot;center&amp;quot;|[[Media:A00020 BlockLamp.JPG|Block NPR on end]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Description for the Construction of Lamps  (by L.G.V Rota  8.9.1938) == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# The dimensions of the lamps upon the designs is the natural size, I consider if the manufacturer keeps a standard size more than 3 or 4 mm that is of no importance as long as it is not smaller. &lt;br /&gt;
# All measurements are shown in millimetres. &lt;br /&gt;
# In all the lamps, the wire strips exceed 100mm as indicated in the design, a fact which is necessary for connecting them to their blocks.&lt;br /&gt;
# All the wires and strips must be supported or secured by means a fastening in pure glass D, then next by the base cup E of the lamp[assign through into pins F (see figure below insulated in glass. These pins are secured into ebonite or other neutral material, as is common in the making of lamps. &lt;br /&gt;
# All filaments must be the purest possible, and in filaments moulded in alloy on can maintain the ordinary proportions., only afterwards I must be informed of the specification of the alloy content of each metal.&lt;br /&gt;
# Of each kind of filament or strip used , there must be reserved for me a piece of each quality, may be 30cm of platinum and 40cms of each of the others. &lt;br /&gt;
# The diameter of the filaments or strips, and the size of the pastilles are given for each lamp in the explanation. &lt;br /&gt;
# For each wire is given its composition, and its position is indicated in the drawings&lt;br /&gt;
# a general recapitulation is made of the wire used, the number and quality for each lamp. &lt;br /&gt;
# All lamps must contain 2 gases Krypton and neon, in equal proportions at a pressure of 0.6 atmosphere. &lt;br /&gt;
# I wish to have : &lt;br /&gt;
#* (a) 3 lamps of the first lamp &lt;br /&gt;
#* (b) 3 lamps of the second &lt;br /&gt;
#* (c) 4 lamps of the third &lt;br /&gt;
#* (d) 5 lamps of the sixth D E F &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00021 lamp1.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===First Lamp===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Powered by Block NPR&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;A 3 wires &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 1 Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 1 Cu &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 1 Zn&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;B 3 wires &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Wire 2 Ag-Pb &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 2 Cd-Pb &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 2 Zn-Pb&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;C 3 wires &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Wire 3 Au-Cu &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 3 Au-Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 3 Au-Cd All soldered to circle 3 or concentric to the first on inner circle A (Ag) &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;D 2 wires &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 4 Au-Cu-Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;wire 4 W platinum pastille soldered thereon &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;E 3 circular wires for A,B,C &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Pt&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Ag&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td colspan=&amp;quot;4&amp;quot;&amp;gt; F Platinum pastille on the central wires soldered thereon&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The diameter of the eleven vertical wires is 0.5 mm length &amp;gt; 100mm &lt;br /&gt;
* The diameter of the horizontal wire is on circles A, B, C is between 0.35 and 0.4 mm. &lt;br /&gt;
* The Platinum pastille soldered to the two wires 4 and 5 is 6mm diameter and 0.3 mm thick. &lt;br /&gt;
* The wires 4 and 5 are insulated and independent of the other vertical and horizontal wires and at the center of the latter. If these two wires are needed to be secured, the must not touch beneath each frame the other wires vertical and horizontal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Second Lamp=== &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Powered by block SPR&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;G 3 wires&lt;br /&gt;
Soldered to circle D &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Wire 4 AG &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Wire 5 cu &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Wire 6 AG&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;H 1 wire    &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Single wire Pt &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;I 2 central wires &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Wire 2 Cu &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Wire 3 W &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;J 1 circular wire &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Au-Cu-Ag (alloy) &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;K 1 large pastille&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; Soldered to wires 2 and 3 &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 5 vertical wire diameter 0.5 mm &lt;br /&gt;
* The single vertical wire in platinum perhaps 0.35-0.4mm &lt;br /&gt;
* The circular wire , horizontal diameter 0.5 mm &lt;br /&gt;
* The platinum pastille 0.3 mm thickness, 10mm diameter &lt;br /&gt;
* Wire 2 and 3 are insulated and independent of the other wires, vertical and horizontal. If it is necessary to secure these two wires, they must not touch under each frame, the vertical and horizontal wires.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Third lamp === &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Also powered by block SPR&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table border=&amp;quot;1px&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;L 3 strips &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;strip 1 Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;strip 2 Cu &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Strip3 Ag &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;M 1 wire circle &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Au-Cu-Ag&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;N 1 pastille &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Pt&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/td&amp;gt; &amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The 3 strips breadth 4 mm thickness 0.35-0.4 mm &lt;br /&gt;
* The wire circle A joined to the two Ag strips as shown in the diagram by means of a copper wire 0.5mm in diameter. &lt;br /&gt;
* The strip 2 Cu is insulated and independent of the others Ag 1 and Ag 3 and the circle wire A. Also it carries platinum pastille N. &lt;br /&gt;
* This platinum pastille measures 6 mm diameter and 0.3 mm thick. &lt;br /&gt;
* If this strip Cu2 has to be secured it must not touch under any frame the other strips nor the horizontal wire \a. &lt;br /&gt;
* In the above three lamps, the platinum pastille are at the centre of the wires horizontal and vertical as shown in the diagrams.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The fourth Lamp=== &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00022 lamp3.jpg]]&lt;br /&gt;
* lamp 3 wire vertical Zn Fe Cu&lt;br /&gt;
* Their diameter is 2.5 mm placed in parallel, the Fe is in the middle&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Rogers_and_Jones_Patent&amp;diff=253</id>
		<title>Rogers and Jones Patent</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Rogers_and_Jones_Patent&amp;diff=253"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00054 PatentRogersAndLyon1.jpg|thumb|Page 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00055 PatentRogersAndLyon2.jpg|thumb|Page 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|[[Image:A00056 PatentRogersAndLyon3.jpg|thumb|Page 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Production_of_an_Aircraft_Insensible_to_Gravity_and_Air_Resistance&amp;diff=249</id>
		<title>Production of an Aircraft Insensible to Gravity and Air Resistance</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Production_of_an_Aircraft_Insensible_to_Gravity_and_Air_Resistance&amp;diff=249"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;noinclude&amp;gt;{{Navbar1}}&amp;lt;/noinclude&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00073 Avion 1.jpg|thumb|page 1]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00074 Avion 2.jpg|thumb|page 2]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00075 Avion 3.jpg|thumb|page 3]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00076 Avion 4.jpg|thumb|page 4]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Translation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a previous note I have indicated that metals enclose a latent energy which can, with the aid of certain natural forces, be awakened and utilized.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I make it known furthermore, that the attraction of the earth is due to the action of a certain natural force which it has been possible equally to control and utilize.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the force that keeps in equilibrium the molecules of different bodies. Its action along with that of many other natural forces assures their cohesion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If therefore a metallic mass is treated in a suitable manner with the aid of the natural force which we will call “attraction of the earth”, it is possible to neutralize the above mentioned action which the metallic mass experiences, in such a manner that the mass rests in equilibrium in the air. If one applies to said mass a force greater than the attraction of the earth in the opposite direction, the mass will rise in the air. If by means of a special apparatus one diminishes the intensity of said force, the mass will descend more or less rapidly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Such are the principles which allow the realization of a flying device insensible to the action of the earth and also presents certain number of other advantages.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The apparatus is composed essentially of a closed metallic capsule containing a motor and passengers. The capsule can have any convenient shape, according to the use for which it is required. The form does not have to be aerodynamic, this is of no importance. This capsule is neutral, that is to say the metallic parts of it are not subject to particular treatment. It rests on the ground by means of four wheels and has on the lower part a type of multi-metallic platform carrying four feet which can enter into the ground. The platform is made of metallic strips, specially treated. The capsule is equipped, at its lower part with a treated multi-metallic block  B, which has connections to the pilot’s controls which can be made or broken as required. Similarly in the upper part of the capsule is placed another block B’, which has a different composition to the other, but is treated with the same energies. It is connected to the  pilot’s controls which can be made or broken as required.&lt;br /&gt;
The conjugate action of the platform connected to earth and the block B in contact with the capsule cause the apparatus to lift-off . This operation is assisted by rolling a few metres along the ground. It is slow or rapid depending on the choice of the pilot. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the apparatus has risen some metres the platform is pulled up against the capsule, the contact with the block B is cut and remade to block B’. From this moment the apparatus rises vertically rapidly or not depending on the pilot balancing the action of block B against block B’ because the action of B’ makes the apparatus rise while that of B brakes the descent as well as the speed of the apparatus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The capsule can rise or fall, but it still requires a means of producing forward motion. This is done by a motor.&lt;br /&gt;
* A petrol engine and airscrew as in an ordinary aircraft can be used. In this case the aircraft will be weightless but the risk of fire is the same as in ordinary aircraft.&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless the energy liberated by blocks B and B’ create about the apparatus a zone in which the air is rarefied, such that the apparatus will not have to act against air resistance. It will be equally insensitive to wind or storms so that the petrol engine used can be of very much reduced power.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*It is equally possible to utilize a special motor, which is without combustion, and does not use known energy. Its principle is extremely simple and is applied in the establishment of the apparatus which at the Station (at Mt St. Aignan) serves to control the currents.&lt;br /&gt;
If in a cylinder of copper treated in a special way and enclosing another cylinder of zinc, treated in a special way and mounted on the same axis, the latter cylinder will be caused to revolve more or less rapidly depending on the depth of penetration of one cylinder within the other. The rotation movement furthermore will serve to assure the movement of the apparatus by means of ……….. [this part is missing from the originals text]  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The treatment of the metallic pieces of the motor is renewed in proportion to the travel of the apparatus, the speed could be as much as 1000Km per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Etablissement d&amp;#039;un avion Insensible à la Pesanteur]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Questions/Answers&amp;diff=251</id>
		<title>Questions/Answers</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Questions/Answers&amp;diff=251"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;em&amp;gt;Our web site has a limited scope, so we don&amp;#039;t expect (yet) so many emails. So we did not implement a forum and don&amp;#039;t use very much the discussions pages. We have just a very simple procedure:  e-mail your question to webmaster@wikirota.org, we will then publish your question and our response here. Of course, to protect your intimacy, we don’t show your email address, and won’t publish your request if you wish so. This method allows us to easily synchronize the different language version of wikirota (French and English for now..)&amp;lt;/em&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Frequently Asked Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Who is Behind WikiRota.org ?&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
:wikirota is the result of a meeting between 3 individuals 30 years ago...&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Dr Michael Watson&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::: I became interested in the research of L.G.V. Rota after reading an article on his work in a long defunct popular fringe science journal called the Modern Mystic and Monthly Science Review.. (see [[The Work of Louis Rota#My Interest| My Interest]]).&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Daniel Rota&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
::&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Guy Leblond&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;How Louis Rota did finance it&amp;#039;s research?&amp;#039;&amp;#039;;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;What is the cause Louis Rota&amp;#039; death&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Is there any witness to the medical work of LGV Rota?&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Can I participate to the Wikirota project ?&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Recent Questions ==&lt;br /&gt;
=== From Sean, Aug 11, 2006: Informations on the specific currents attributed to each Metals===&lt;br /&gt;
====  Question ====&lt;br /&gt;
Hello Michael&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was struck by rota analasis of metals as composites of a number of&lt;br /&gt;
different curents, and the statment that some metals are made from others.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have been studying alchemy in some detail, and the few who wrote about&lt;br /&gt;
alchemy who actually practiced talk about reducing metals to a few basic&lt;br /&gt;
substances some which are specific to that metal, some common throught the&lt;br /&gt;
metals. the process is the same and the sustances produced are largely&lt;br /&gt;
agreed upon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would be interested in seeing if there is any correlation between rotas&lt;br /&gt;
analyasis of the universal currents and the purified substances that&lt;br /&gt;
alchemists talk about. Do you have any more information on the specific&lt;br /&gt;
currents atributed to specific metals?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any help would be gratfully recieved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Response ====&lt;br /&gt;
Rota&amp;#039;s universal current seems to be the same energy as is used in mineral and metallic alchemy. The modern alchemist, Jean Dubuis says (Volume 4 page 1, Mineral Alchemy)    &amp;quot; ......As for the vital energies at play in the mineral or metallic experiments, they are much more potent. The body of man is not at all or very little accustomed to these energies which only manifest on earth in the telluric currents&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the universal currents, Rota detected 361 ot them up to the time of his death, all we know is the number of constituent currents of one or two metals, for example, copper is made from four specific currents. Like the alchemists&amp;#039; universal solvent the metals were apparently dissolved by the universal current into their component universal currents all the atoms electrons, protons, neutrons etc dissappear, this is analogous to salt dissolved  in water, except in the latter case the atoms remain intact. The physical energy has not gone anywhere, it is in solution, take the universal current away and the metal reappears. You can see an analogous idea also in common electrolysis, except in the case of the universal current the metal is totally dissolved atoms and all. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Rota&amp;#039;s discovery that the universal currents are active in the human body and are a part of the life process if not the main part seems to me to indicate their negative entropic nature, because the building of order from disorder is the mark of the life process.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Mike Watson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== from Jeff May 2006: The work of Nathan Stubblefield ===&lt;br /&gt;
==== Question ====&lt;br /&gt;
Congratulations to Mike Watson for this fascinating compilation on the work of Rota. This sounds quite similar to the work of Nathan Stubblefield, in regards to his &amp;quot;electrolytic cell&amp;quot;. There is a great writeup about it on John Bedini&amp;#039;s page, and I have been attempting to replicate the cell myself, which, in fact is not really electrolytic in nature given the supposed power output, which Stubblefield insisted was produced by telluric currents. It was stated by that during periods of increased geomagnetic activities that telephonic operators heard these notes, and were also described as birds through their recievers. This page sheds alot of light on what Stubblefield may have been onto pre-Tesla. Great job.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Response from Mike Watson ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rota&amp;#039;s Blocks were completely sealed. When I dug up one of his blocks in 1959, I dismantled it to find out how it was constructed. It was covered in many layers of heavily varnished cloth transformer tape. It was so well sealed that when I stripped off the tape I could still smell the spirit solvent used for the varnish, the block had by that time been buried some 25 years.&lt;br /&gt;
All the metallic laminations were shiny, as new, without any sign of corrosion. The blocks were clearly  field sensors, no conduction current being involved. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;If&amp;#039;&amp;#039; this field is earth born VLF electromagnetic waves then following from Rota, electromagnetism must be composed of  components which he called universal currents. When we detect EM waves with a receiver we are actually detecting the energy they contain. The receiver does not care about how the energy gets there so to modern technology all universal currents are indistinguishable from common VLF EM fields.&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that Rota found that metals are able gradually to detect these individual components which results in the metal becoming activated, &amp;quot;awakening its latent energy&amp;quot;. This results in the metal selectively amplifying components of the incident EM field.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Stubblefield seems to have found the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Comments from Jeff ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tesla often said that electricity was composed of different &amp;quot;elements&amp;quot;, so I agree with the major points of Rotas&amp;#039; Universal Current theory. I also believe that much of Tesla&amp;#039;s work is misunderstood. Tesla said the most important aspect of his magnifying transmitter was the grounding, something to the effect that they excavated and laid an immense grounding structure before the foundation for the tower was poured.  I wish I could provide a link, but I forgot where I read that. Your comment touched precisely on a question I&amp;#039;ve been considering. The distinctions and relationships of the Earth&amp;#039;s EM field to ground induced currents (GIC&amp;#039;s), telluric currents, the ionosphere, magnetopause, and ELF/VLF/ULF waves are not clearly documented.....&amp;quot;Aetheric&amp;quot; physics had a &amp;quot;unified field theory&amp;quot; of sorts relating magnetism and electricity (gravity), based partially on Maxwells&amp;#039; original quaternion equations at the turn of the century. There are many &amp;quot;holes&amp;quot; in electrical engineering and physics to be probed (such as grounding/bonding lol!), but is there evidence in contemporary geoelectrical/magnetic research that can point us in a direction to understanding exactly what Rota was doing other than earthquake early detection and basic LF EM waves I wonder? I found the work of Stubblefield first, which is not nearly as extensive, or as well documented as Rotas&amp;#039; here. I had initially wondered if Stubblefield was mistaken about the nature of the telluric currents he was tapping into, and that perhaps the effect was produced by EM coupling/induction. My initial batteries I made of vinyl coated wire, instead of cloth covered, thereby eliminating any galvanic or thermocoupling effects. After finally finding enough cloth covered wire to make some as-per the patent, my results were almost interesting, and inconclusive. The work of Rota has now raised some interesting questions to me about how Stubblefield was able to produce these &amp;quot;instant&amp;quot; voltages, enough to power his communication equipment, arc lamps, or small motors, obviously the source was not purely telluric in nature.  I&amp;#039;m also curious what effects geography, altitude, and soil composition have on the currents. I myself live up in the Colorado Springs area at a very high altitude. The lightning here is amazing, but the soil is very dry decomposed granite &amp;quot;gravel&amp;quot;, the countryside is peppered with gold and quartz mines. Quartz and gold both have natural properties I assume I need not mention..............This work of LGV Rotas&amp;#039; also passes fairly close to Henry Morays&amp;#039;. Fascinating. The &amp;quot;Cage à Moineau&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;transducteur&amp;quot; devices need to be replicated for a better understanding.&lt;br /&gt;
I whole-heartedly support replication and further studies of Rotas&amp;#039; work, this man was obviously far ahead of his time. Even in &amp;quot;free energy&amp;quot; circles I had never heard of his work; I really feel he was on to something.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Questions/Reponses]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Note_On_Medical_Applications&amp;diff=243</id>
		<title>Note On Medical Applications</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Note_On_Medical_Applications&amp;diff=243"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;This gives more detail than Dr Kresser’s article quoted above. Rota actually associates the current number with various bacteria etc but also the metals. The numbers are his and arbitrary, but since he uses these throughout and in other areas as well the relationship between metals and numbers is important.&lt;br /&gt;
I have translated this note a closely as I can because it gives a much more practical view about how Rota actually went about diagnosis. The attribution that many diseases were syphilitic in origin seemed to have been current between the wars and Rota seemed to have picked that idea up. He does not necessarily always mean an active physical “bug” but rather a sort of taint, historical, genetic(atavistic) in origin, which is present as a universal  current.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
== Translation ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_1_NoteOnMedical.jpg|200px|right|]]&lt;br /&gt;
Dear Doctor and Friend,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I believe it well to respond here to some questions brought up at the time of our meeting with friend Lachouque, I have reserved necessary time to make a note more precise on this subject &lt;br /&gt;
I make a point of making remarking immediately that I do not pretend to give you lessons      ( one does not teach a cat how to climb) but for the present expose, I will have to quote you names of well known physicians, diseases, microbes knowing nevertheless very well that you understand these better than me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You have told to me that when a physician is well experienced it will come by just looking at a sick person in his consulting room to know more or less what is suffering from.. I never see anything amazing like that, because for my part not being a physician but a simple physicist I base mine on more than twenty years of multiple observations and study, personal and practical.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am not a person endowed with clairvoyance, unfortunately! That would be too simple… My work is much more complex, very much deeper than saying simply “at first sight that man is ill”. When I am myself depressed or ill this is very much more tiring but my examinations are by no means good for that; you will recall what state I was in when I made the diagnosis of Monsieur W.?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not only my work and my revolutionary discoveries in current medical science, but I have proved that since Hypocrates, after the thesis of the humors, medicine has not advanced more than a little way  and without discerning the existence of living matter. It is evident that biology opens up new ways in the pathology of many illnesses, but without, nevertheless, being able to discern the why and how of these living microbes and their specific qualities. It is rightly here that my discoveries come to the help of medicine, or better humanity which the pontiffs of the medical academies want or do not want the physicians of the future to have to commence their studies by way of physics, passing at length through chemistry  and coming to the natural and universal currents which build the smallest and the biggest and direct everything in the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When a sick person comes to your surgery in order to be examined by me, I ask him to tell me what his problem is, and after that simple statement, my method consists  to look, verify check why he is ill, how the first symptoms of his illness manifests, how it has developed and how it has ended up, which the microbe(s) are in his body, how they live, how did they arrive, where is their center, how are they working, of what nature are they etc…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I group the microbes &lt;br /&gt;
*a) Purely inorganic&lt;br /&gt;
*b) Organic&lt;br /&gt;
*c) Those that are mixed together&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example : &lt;br /&gt;
*Trepomena pallidum, Hematozoaires, are inorganic&lt;br /&gt;
*Koch, Gonococcus (Neisser) are organic&lt;br /&gt;
*Staphylococcus, Streptococcus , Bacillus of  Klebs or Diphtheria etc are some organic and inorganic.&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_2_NoteOnMedical.jpg|200px|right|]]&lt;br /&gt;
I could continue further for the bacillus of Bubonic  Plague, the three bacillus of Nansen, Leprosy and all known bacilli belong to one of the three categories above noted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Now knowing this and in the knowledge of the intrinsic constitution or reality of blood and of the constitution not solely anatomical  but intrinsic in the nerves in all their known origin above all about the fibers of myelin of Leuwenhoeck etc. I have to recognize because of the restricted knowledge of physicians on the origin and the existence of reproduction in living material , they make the miracles for the struggle against the infinity of unknown and imponderable enemies (bacillus, microbes etc.) Only a very deep understanding of the derivation and the evolution of living matter are we able to fight on equal terms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have arrived now at my method based on the discovery of my universal currents, method with which nothing can pass undetected; there is no error possible. These currents control the infinitely big as well as the infinitely small. The 361 currents that we know are divided into three categories:&lt;br /&gt;
*	First group  or category : 1 to 117 – 153&lt;br /&gt;
*	Second group or category : 117 to 216&lt;br /&gt;
*	Third group  or category : 210 to 361&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;First group : That is connected directly with everything regarding the earth and planets.&lt;br /&gt;
*;Second group: That which control and unite with those of the first group to form between the two the movement of the whole solar system&lt;br /&gt;
*;Third group: That which acts in a very intense way on minerals, life and all beings and the ensemble (or coordination)  of the universe.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In considering the specific qualities of each microbe or bacteria and of the category of currents to which they belong in consideration of the Being or living matter which I have to examine I conclude:&lt;br /&gt;
*1)	If this being is healthy or sick&lt;br /&gt;
*2)	If he has a microbe or bacillus&lt;br /&gt;
*3)	If this microbe are developing or are latent, acquired or dated to the moment of conception or both.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A healthy being without any microbes corresponding to a current of the first category  but having as base two currents of the second category in t.d.(?) constant are very rare.We have the microbes or bacillus:-&lt;br /&gt;
*Inorganic currents 158 - 249&lt;br /&gt;
*Organic   currents 110 – 203&lt;br /&gt;
*Combined currents 81 -147 – 217.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inorganic trypanosomes have as base the current 231 – 3” – 9”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Hematozaires inorganic have as base current 246 – 223 – 17”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And further the groups of such and such category of microbes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The organic Koch microbe has as base 164 – 4” – 1” – 3”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conocoque  microbe  has as base 151,- 8”, - 3”, - 19”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And further the group with all the derivations particulars and relatives of each microbe, Syphpilis for example has two microbes both of which are different and distinct.&lt;br /&gt;
|-  valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_3_NoteOnMedical.jpg|200px|right|]]&lt;br /&gt;
There are three species of hematozaires very different etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Relevant to diagnostic, I will make this remark:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Taking for example the case of an illness of unknown origin (for me, directly or indirectly syphilis), the practitioner in doubt will perform every analysis including a lumbar puncture, but sometimes all results are negative. Now, in my examination I am able immediately to understand the cause; it is that of atavism, I am even able to specify which side of the family; whether the illness is latent  in the blood (because the blood and its current have their own appropriate reactions), I can discover equally the microbe, it also having its own appropriate current.&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding this subject, I take note of a remark (which you undoubtedly know) of Professor Fournier, on the harmful effects of syphilis. “For me, he said,  I hold it for certain that independent of the illnesses incontestably specific in origin and of a syphilitic nature, it is undoubtedly responsible for a number of morbid manifestations, which are not of a syphilitic nature but are none the less syphilitic in origin, and in this sense they are under its influence, since  it seems likely that they will not occur without it”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Prof. Fornier; Les effections parasyphilitiques. 1894.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All this is absolutely true, and I have been able to verify and prove it in large numbers of my examinations. In the same manner there are about twenty or so illnesses badly understood but whose root is syphilis. It is similar in malaria by the base current and the appropriate reaction for hematozoaires, I can verify immediately on examination its origin, its development, and if the development is latent, and this thanks to its own current from which I have been able to determine the nature and the diverse characteristic of malaria and its transmission through conception.&lt;br /&gt;
After all these notes, I believe you will comprehend better why the current of the place is of capital importance in conception and how it is explained that in a family of five children  three can be syphilitic by atavism and the other two can be absolutely healthy. The examination of a subject allows me to check all that has happened to him and all that will come to him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I continue &lt;br /&gt;
*1) I examine and verify the organic and inorganic balance of the person and after that one knows directly his deficiencies.&lt;br /&gt;
*2) One has knowledge of the reactions of each part of an anatomical organ.&lt;br /&gt;
*3) One knows the location of the microbes in the body, their development , action and   Toxicity according to their different types.&lt;br /&gt;
*4) The illness itself if is recent or at the time of conception, heredity etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Knowing which of each thing, illnesses, microbes etc are connected directly to numerous currents. It remains to determine what are the actions and reactions they produce, that is to say which current has to be put in play in order to obtain the compensation capable of arresting the development of the illness and ameliorate or better cure it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Example Malle N.. Diagnostic positive: syphilis, alcoholism, tuberculosis , all three being atavistic in origin . The first two from the father and the third from the mother. I have to arrest the first, ameliorate the state in general, suppress the combined action of the three which give a toxin due to the different microbes. Syphilis , current 231 I put against the currents 168-189 Chrome [metal].  Koch current 164 I put in reaction with currents 150 163, Silicon and so on. Next I balance the working of the two with the block of Cu [copper], Zn[zinc], Fe[iron], Sn[tin] Pb[lead], that is to say with the appropriate currents of these metals.&lt;br /&gt;
|-  valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;text-align: justify&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_4_NoteOnMedical.jpg|200px|right]]&lt;br /&gt;
With the mattress, [the special mattresses had springs made of different metals and alloys] we obtained the following results.&lt;br /&gt;
*1) After 10 days the pain started to diminish&lt;br /&gt;
*2)  After 25 days the pain disappeared completely, the hip is less inflamed and the general state of health has improved.&lt;br /&gt;
*3)  After 5 month she was walking without any difficulty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the block connected to the mattress&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general health is completely restored, all the problems have disappeared and maintained after 18 months of treatment despite being 47 years old. This person is capable of working without fatigue each day for 6 hours from 10 am to 11 pm at night. I have to say that this illness has been observed scrupulously all my directions during the course of the treatment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My dear friends, today I cannot expand further on this vast subject; I believe that you have already there what to reflect and of how to respond on the multiple questions of your fellow-members. Excuse me  if I have not explained to you as clearly as I thought. But you have M. Lachouque to open the door where you find it closed, because until now he is the only one to have followed and understood the work of &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Your devoted friend &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;L.G.V.Rota&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S In addition to this document here are some BASE CURRENTS of different metals&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #CCCCCC&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!	!!Current of the base!!	Metal!!	D&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|1||333||Pt||21,5&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|2||324||Au||19,32&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|3||301||W||19,3&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|4||289||Hg||13,26 -15&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|5||279||Pb||11,37&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|6||281||Ag||10,05&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|7||203||Bi||9,80&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|8||252||Cu||8,39&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|9||261||Sn||7,29&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|10||189||Cr||7,1&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|11||270||Zn||1,1&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|12||171||As||5,73&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|13||163||Si||2,3&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|14||162||Mg||1,74&lt;br /&gt;
|- style=&amp;quot;background-color: #DDDDDD#&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|15||159||Ca||1,55	&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Applications Médicales]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Notes&amp;diff=245</id>
		<title>Notes</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Notes&amp;diff=245"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[fr:Notes]]&lt;br /&gt;
=={{Link|LGV Rota}} and the death penalty==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Link|LGV Rota}}&amp;#039;s son was quite surprised to learn recently by browsing the internet that his father&amp;#039;s work was referenced  by at least 2 US court:&lt;br /&gt;
*;U.S Supreme court: case against the State of Louisiana in 1985 ([http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&amp;amp;vol=471&amp;amp;invol=1080#t29 471 U.S. 1080 (1985) –  Jimmy L.Class v. Louisiana No. 84-6030])&lt;br /&gt;
::28 L.G.V. Rota, a renowned French electrical scientist, concluded after extensive research that &lt;br /&gt;
:::&amp;quot;[i]n every case of electrocution, . . . death inevitably supervenes but it may be very long, and above all, excruciatingly painful . . . . [T]he space of time before death supervenes varies according to the subject. Some have a greater physiological resistance than others. I do not believe that anyone killed by electrocution dies instantly, no matter how weak the [471 U.S. 1080 , 1089]   subject may be. In certain cases death will not have come about even though the point of contact of the electrode with the body shows distinct burns. Thus, in particular cases, the condemned person may be alive and even conscious for several minutes without it being possible for a doctor to say whether the victim is dead or not. . . . This method of execution is a form of torture.&amp;quot; 29 &lt;br /&gt;
*Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts&lt;br /&gt;
::[http://www.nodp.org/ma/stacks/369_Mass_242.txt http://www.nodp.org/ma/stacks/369_Mass_242.txt]&lt;br /&gt;
:::While the actual physical and psychological pain of execution itself is, of course, immeasurable, there is a sharp conflict of expert opinion regarding whether electrocution produces instantaneous loss of consciousness. At least one observer, a French scientist, concluded: &amp;quot;I do not believe that anyone killed by electrocution dies instantly, no matter how weak the subject may be.&amp;quot; Comment, The Death Penalty Cases, 56 Cal. L. Rev. 1268, 1339 (1968), quoting Prof. L. G. V. Rota in Scott,  [***14]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ground Induced Current==&lt;br /&gt;
On March 13, 1989, at 2:44 am, a transformer failure on one of the main power transmission lines in the Hydro Quebec system precipitated a catastrophic collapse of the entire power grid. The string of events that produced the collapse took only 90 seconds from start to finish. There was no time for any meaningful intervention. The transformer failure was a direct consequence of ground induced currents from a space weather disturbance high in the atmosphere. 6 million people lost electrical power for 9 or more hours. The space weather disturbance that produced this devastation was a great magnetic storm. Great magnetic storms are awesome disturbances in the near-Earth space environment that occur relatively rarely. The last five occurred in February 1986, March 1989, March 1991, November 1991 and May 1992.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Photo_Album&amp;diff=247</id>
		<title>Photo Album</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Photo_Album&amp;diff=247"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Photo Album]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Marseille ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00077 LGV Rota.jpg|thumb|220px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00081 RotaWorshopPlane.jpg|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00082 LgvWindTunel.jpg|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00010 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00016 AeroRadioBalistique.jpg|thumb|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== England ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=top&lt;br /&gt;
|[[IMage:A00085_HeraldDrought.JPG|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00083 Herald.JPG|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size: 2em&amp;quot;&amp;gt;THE DROUGHT.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:1.4em&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;span style=&amp;quot;white-spaces:nowrap&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ITS CAUSE AND PROBABLE&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; DURATION&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|- valign=top&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00084 HeraldTelluric.JPG|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00086 Herald4.jpg|400px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|...&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Mont Saint Aignan ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00052 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00053 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00050 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00049 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2 valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00051 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Genissieux ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00001 MaisonGenissieux.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_Genissieux.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Apparatus==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Mont_Saint_Aignan_Laboratory&amp;diff=237</id>
		<title>Mont Saint Aignan Laboratory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Mont_Saint_Aignan_Laboratory&amp;diff=237"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Mont Saint Aignan ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00052 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00053 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00050 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00049 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2 valign=&amp;quot;bottom&amp;quot;|[[Image:A00051 MontSaintAignan.jpg|thumb|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Nathan_Stubblefield&amp;diff=239</id>
		<title>Nathan Stubblefield</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Nathan_Stubblefield&amp;diff=239"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Nathan Stubblefield]]&lt;br /&gt;
== Who is Nathan Stubblefield ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
{{CopyFrom|From=[http://www.Wikipedia.org Wikipedia]&lt;br /&gt;
|Link=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nathan_Stubblefield&lt;br /&gt;
|Text=Nathan B. Stubblefield (November 22, 1860 - March 28, 1928) was an American inventor and Kentucky melon farmer. It has been claimed that Stubblefield invented the radio before either Nikola Tesla or Guglielmo Marconi, but some of his devices seem to have worked by induction transmission and some by electrical conduction rather than by radio transmission. Because Marconi&amp;#039;s contemporaneous experiments focused on CW or Morse code transmission, Stubblefield remained a claimant for the invention of wireless telephony, or wireless transmission of the human voice. &lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The experiment of Jeff Dobbs ==&lt;br /&gt;
(in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Is there a link between the Work of LGV Rota and Nathan Subblefield ? ==&lt;br /&gt;
(in progress)&lt;br /&gt;
see also [[Talk:Main Page]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Nature_and_detection_of_the_Universal_Currents&amp;diff=241</id>
		<title>Nature and detection of the Universal Currents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Nature_and_detection_of_the_Universal_Currents&amp;diff=241"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Nature et détection des courants universels]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__ &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Presentation== &lt;br /&gt;
In one of Rota’s laboratory notes he says:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;At the start I thought that telluric currents were magnetic in nature and in consequence I conducted experiments into the concentration of electromagnetic waves of long wavelength using the earth as a collector&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;text-align:justify&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Today, we would call this Extra/Very Low Frequency (E/V LF) electromagnetic waves, but as we shall this lead to something far more important.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00002_LouisRota.gif|thumb|right|&amp;lt;center&amp;gt;Rota listening to the earth currents&amp;lt;/center&amp;gt; ]]Before proceeding further into the nub of Rota&amp;#039;s discovery, the Universal Current, needs explanation. Rota used headphones and a stop watch to detect the Universal currents (see picture). It is a purely physical process. Rota at first investigated telluric electric currents caused by induction from changes in the earth&amp;#039;s magnetic field. In his notes Rota mentions the theory of Lord Kelvin ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Thomson,_1st_Baron_Kelvin Sir William Thomson]) that earth currents originate from the rotation of the earth in is non uniform N-S magnetic field. (The Magnetic north pole is not coincident with the rotational axis of the earth).  Rota started From Lord Kelvin’s idea that telluric or earth currents originate totally in the earth and were not external in origin. As mentioned above, earth currents caused disruption in early telegraphs which had a single wire mounted on poles and an earth return via buried metal plates. Rota set out to investigate the variations in telluric currents noted by telegraph operators to see if they were systematic in any way. He also noticed that ships in motion caused low frequency variations in potential on a metal cylinder immersed in water compared to one above the water. He extended this idea to aircraft detection and developed a special detection device which he subsequently patented  ([[LGV_Rota_Patents|GB128624, GB129059, FR536324]]) that exploited this discovery. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first Rota thought that aircraft and ships caused disturbances in the magnetic field of telluric currents which, in his view flowed continually in the earth, and these were detected by his patented apparatus, but sometime the end of the first world war he performed experiments on radio transmission through the earth. He discovered that in certain places the variations of signal between insulated grounded metal rods and insulated grounded wires of dissimilar metals separated by some distance showed different values depending on which metals were used for the metal pairs, furthermore he found that different metal pairs would simultaneously show different variations of signal. From these observations, he concluded that the electrical currents that he had transmitted through the earth had an “inner content” which was metal specific. In addition, he discovered that different metals transmitted signals through the earth better in some directions than others, and when the receiver antenna buried in the earth was the same metal as the transmitter reception was better. This gave him the idea that the radio signal was transmitted through the earth on a directional “emanation” which came from the metal, and furthermore this emanation was strongly influenced by the direction of the earth’s magnetic field. At that time, powerful spark transmitters were still in use for radio communication. It is supposed, he extended this idea to the natural telluric currents regarding them as being “metallic emanations” from deep in the earth carrying electromagnetic energy.  This is something like ionization which will be discussed later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electrical potential as understood by Rota is a property its carrier agent and so should not be thought of simple thing in isolation but the property of a mixture of several components, the different metals separate this mixture being individually responsive to one component as distinct from another. Rota understood that these underlying component potentials revealed by different metals were more important than the just the overall electrical potential because the emanations from the metal rather like ionic streams could carry additional information. He found that emanations from the metals were not simple but consisted of a number of components which he called “Universal Currents” since one component or another could be found universally in nature and any mixture of them always are carried an electrical potential and flowed like an ionic electric current. However, the emanations from the metals seem to have more properties than the ions familiar to chemists although of a similar nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Earth Probes or Blocks==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis of Rota’s apparatus allows us to gain an insight into its operation. Rota used deeply buried metallic probes to detect the earth potentials. These probes he called blocks. They were of a laminated multi-metallic construction (iron, tin, lead, zinc, cadmium, nickel etc.). The blocks were insulated from the surrounding soil so it is clear that he was interested in variation of potential which would couple capacitively/inductively into the probes or blocks rather than by direct conduction. (There is a possibility that the “ions” produced from the metals of the block could actually penetrate the varnish insulation, but the blocks I dug up showed no sign of corrosion despite having been buried over twenty years). However early blocks were probably not insulated from the soil. Extensive very thick cables (fig. 4) lead from the blocks into the laboratory. Two blocks separated by some 200 metres constituted an induction loop for the universal earth current(s).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:A00048_SchemaBlock.jpg]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rota made the buried groups from laminations of different metals. The whole ensemble of metals formed a laminated metallic structure, which Rota called simply a “block”. This block when buried would pick up all the current types in that locality. Other localities were found to have different current groupings, and for that given area a different block with different metals would be needed. (See Figs1, 2, 3)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Blocks (Fig. 1) were buried in some cases at considerable depth. He was able to detect the telluric currents, using conventional galvanometers, headphones etc., but after he had made a crucial discovery the strength of the current detected instrumentally was dependent on the type of metal used in the block, the connection between the nature of the metal itself and the telluric current suggested itself. Investigating these telluric energies and some time during this period, he found that for buried blocks close to each other but of different metals, one block would give a large output from the telluric energies and another adjacent block of a different metal would give little or no output. Also, on another occasion two adjacent blocks might be active and a third not etc. A block became in effect a means of tapping a specific group of currents in a given locality. To tap different current groups would require different metals within the block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output from these blocks then became substantially greater the more carefully they were adjusted in terms of amount of metal of one sort or another present in the block. Curiously the mass of a given metal is important. The different metals (as laminations) in a block have to match the telluric energy being detected for maximum output. Also as time went by the blocks grew in power without any intervention from outside. This &amp;quot;acclimatisation&amp;quot; process took about four years. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rota found that using a pair of phones he could hear the telluric currents which gave a characteristic note when connected to the blocks. Each block gave a different note or more correctly a characteristic tone, and also the note changed periodically over a period ranging from seconds to months. The periodicity meant that he could get the same tone from a given block after a known time. He then realised that there were many different sorts of telluric current, each giving its own sound in the headphones connected to a given block, and each fluctuating in a characteristic periodic manner. He later claimed to have found 361 different types of telluric current. All currents have a fixed and generally different direction in the earth. Their intensity and what Rota called their density changes but their direction is always fixed. The rise and fall of these parameters occurs at fixed times which enabled Rota to predict in advance when a given current was going to be active.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As previously mentioned, there is a connection between a given telluric current and a specific metal and when Rota experimented with blocks of single metals such as copper, zinc or iron etc he found that a given metal was responsive to more than one telluric current. However, the number of telluric currents detectable by common metals was relatively small. Thus copper is sensitive to four specific currents, zinc to six etc. Rota noted that the blocks gradually amplified the currents. This lead him to a very important discovery, I quote one of his documents:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;I have come to discover and prove how, in placing a metal of whatsoever kind in direct and suitable presence of its own intrinsic current which gave to the metal its origin one succeeds in awakening the latent energy of this metal and consequently to have at our disposal immense free energy for all kinds of industry and its applications&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the metal buried in the ground emanates some sort of penetrating ions, then this claim is a natural consequence. The metal as the source would in time become used up. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We can see from this that the telluric current must be far more complex than electricity, in fact as we shall discover later electricity is, according to Rota, caused by the action of two telluric currents and magnetism by another three making five in all. Even gravitation has a current basis. These fascinating problems will be discussed below in more detail. These ideas are a departure from the metallic emanation view and he evidently thought that electrons were not all the same.  Also, at some stage Rota decided that the telluric currents were not confined to the earth but originate from the cosmos and seem to play an important role in nature existing everywhere on earth including in living beings. For this reason he renamed the telluric currents he had detected, Universal Currents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The difference between Universal Current and the Electric Current==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of Rota’s laboratory notes says this regarding electricity:-&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
“That which we call in physics Static Electricity  is an imponderable which results from the action of two natural energies; these latter form part of an ensemble of cosmic energies the existence and effects of which I have discovered. These two energies have their own specific properties but they are able to form one single energy when certain conditions are fulfilled; one sees an analogue between natural electricity and that produced empirically in the usual way. Three natural currents, different from the first two, give birth to an energy which goes under the name of magnetism. The result of these five energies working together is what we call electromagnetism. Thanks to intrinsic properties of each one of them, these currents can, according to the elements which they meet either in nature or dispersed by the hand of man produce effects at the present time not understood”. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This opens up the question as to whether electromagnetism is always the same as far as its constituent energies are concerned. For example if a battery is made using say zinc and copper in a suitable electrolyte connected by wires to a torch bulb and another battery using say iron and zinc are the constituent energies in the electric current the same in both cases? This of course is nothing to do with the volts and amps but would be to do with the “inner structure” of the electric current. If electricity has its origin externally and is cosmic in origin, then the “inner structure” is always the same. This view requires that the act of generating electricity is a process involving the attraction of an external energy; a specific group of universal currents. Rota’s original telluric currents were very similar in behaviour to a current of metallic ions. Whatever the origin of electricity, apparently the component universal currents do not act and react against one another. The self exchanging mechanism occurs only when the currents are active and so the currents may be regarded as static and inert. It will be seen later that these currents are active in living organisms and life is dependent on such an action and reaction. When this ceases death ensues, so it is clear that from this point of view electricity is dead. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In any case it is important to note that physical instruments are blind to the constituent universal currents in an electric current, instruments only detect volts and amps. Therefore two different groups of universal currents having the same voltage and the same current would be seen as identical by voltmeters and ammeters even if the constituents were different. The universal currents in an electric current may be chaotic, this is possibly why Rota said that the electric current is a degradation of its universal current components. When the metals involved in the production of an electric current are “awakened” the electric current detected is the result of an action and reaction of the constituent currents in a coordinated way. This produces a characteristic tone which can be seen as a waveform on an oscilloscope or heard in a pair of headphones owing to the large fluctuations in potential as the various components synchronously add and subtract. The “awakening” is a harmonizing effect which Rota called Synchronization.  The high potentials produced in this way caused the shock Rota received during his early experiments. An analogue to this process is an orchestra. If the members are playing at random there is just general noise, but if playing together in a coordinated way a tune is heard and also much louder impulses of sound. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To sum up, the difference between the universal current and the electric current is that the latter is a group of five component currents currents which are internally static that is they  do not act and react whereas the universal currents dynamically act and react in a pulsatory manner. A metal can be activated so that its components currents act and react. The awakening of a metal is a process called synchronization. Later it will be seen that living organisms carry universal currents which act and react on each other and when this exchange ceases the organism is dead. Electricity does not act and react and so by this standard it is dead. The universal current which does show this exchange may be thought of as “living electricity”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Synchronization==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Returning to the blocks Rota used, when a multi-metallic block is first buried, in the location appropriate to the metals the individual metals are dormant. In time the metals become active producing a coherent pulsing due to the action and reaction of the groups of currents of a given metal operating against each other giving that metal its characteristic tone. As mentioned above In order to hear this activity with headphones the metals have to be activated, they have to have their latent energy awakened. The tones from a block are due to the combined action of the currents of all the metals in the block; like an orchestra playing a tune. For example zinc with six currents gives a tone resulting from the sum of the six currents which constitute zinc. (This assumes the zinc metal is awakened by treatment with one or more of its intrinsic currents, otherwise the metal is inert). If zinc and copper were connected together the result would be the random ensemble of the 10 ten different currents, 4 for copper plus 6 for zinc. However, when combined in a buried block, over a period of time, the ensemble would meld into one single characteristic sound specific for that block and dependent on the metals constituting the block. This is the process of harmonizing Rota called synchronization. Accompanying synchronization Rota found an enormous increase in output energy from the block as all the impulses from the block pulse in an ordered manner. The pulsing produces a characteristic tone signature. Synchronisation takes about four years to fully mature. It is not mass or volume dependent, 1 kg takes as long as 100 kg. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Synchronization eventually occurs in the laboratory equipment used with the currents. All the wires, galvanometers, voltmeters, ammeters and phones eventually become synchronised. If this is not done the &amp;quot;discord&amp;quot; drastically inhibits the flow of energy from the block. As mentioned above, common laboratory instruments such as voltmeters and ammeters cannot distinguish between an electric current and a universal current group. A common unsynchronized ammeter may measure a few milliamperes from a block but a synchronised ammeter would read amps from the same block. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, at this point it is worth bringing to light another even more curious fact. Rota maintained that the force which holds matter together at the atomic level was a force he called universal cohesion and also that gravitation which is proportional to mass, were caused by the same force. This force was one or a special group of Universal Currents. It seems that an element consists of a kind of knot of universal currents (four currents in the case of copper for example) bound together by the cohesive force current of universal cohesion or “gravitation”. Rota was well aware that gravitational force was, at the atomic level extremely minute, therefore, I infer that there must be two forms of gravitation. The second (bipolar?) form is enormously strong (because it is the cohesive force in matter) whilst the first monopolar form is a microscopic residue which only assumes significance in the case of large masses such as planets. He experimented with this second form in his antigravity machines, more on this later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Problems in Detection Today==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As will be seen in the patents quoted below any paramagnetic object in motion will produce a disturbance that can be detected by an ordinary electrometer. It appears today under the heading of ULF(Ultra Low Frequency). These disturbances are produced for example by cars and aircraft etc. Rota believed that these disturbances were due to an interaction between cars or aircraft etc. with telluric currents, that is, currents that flowed in the earth, but later came to the conclusion that these currents were cosmic or external in origin. This was a further reason why the telluric currents were renamed Universal currents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Insulated buried probes will pick up a difference in potential if the disturbance in the universal current moves such that the probes are influenced unequally or if they consist of different metals. Initially, the metals pairs show only a very small potential variation but gradually the potentials start to increase as the almost dormant metals start to become active.  It seems to have taken Rota many years to be sure of this effect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To detect the universal currents unequivocally requires that the metal of the probe becomes activated as mentioned above. This needs the correct metal for the characteristic current of the place. If these do not match then the metal will never become active. It is also essential that no chemical action takes place between the metal probe and the ground so it must be well insulated and protected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Miscellaneous_Documents&amp;diff=235</id>
		<title>Miscellaneous Documents</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Miscellaneous_Documents&amp;diff=235"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Documents Divers]]&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 005.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 007.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 006.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 042.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 010.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 011.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 012.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 013.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 021.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 027.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 028.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 029.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 030.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 031.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 009.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 071.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 103.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 104.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 105.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 106.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 107.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 108.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 109.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:Doc LGV ROTA 110.JPG|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Listening_to_the_Rota%27s_effect&amp;diff=233</id>
		<title>Listening to the Rota&#039;s effect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Listening_to_the_Rota%27s_effect&amp;diff=233"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Ecouter L&amp;#039;effet Rota]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
{|cellspacing=10&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|Louis Rota worked with classic vintage bakelite headphones as shown on this picture.  &lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, he claimed that the effectiveness of the headphones could be improved by what he called “the harmonization” of the metallic parts of the headphones.   &lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:exp1HeadPhones.jpg|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The experiment ==&lt;br /&gt;
The following experiment was created  (by Mike Watson) in 1960. When I first started to listen for Rota&amp;#039;s currents on the block dug up from his laboratory site in 1959, I heard nothing with headphones or with any other means. Someone pointed out that when Rota did medical diagnosis, see [[Medical Applications]], he stroked metal rods held in the patients hand. I tried a similar thing using metal disks as shown below. &lt;br /&gt;
I heard several variations in click intensity when one of the phone contacts was touched on the metal but soon found that this was caused by sampling 50 Hz mains pick up from the house wiring. Doing the same in a remote area showed a variation especially if a short antenna was used. It was found that the click was due to the high inductance of the high impedance headphones storing a minute input current and releasing the stored energy as an inductive click as soon the contact was broken. Variations found were due to ultra low frequency signals of the order of 0.01 Hz or less. Note that Rota used a stop watch, as seen in the photograph on the main page of this site, so the variations he was hearing must have had a long cycle time.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This experiment needs doing with two sets of deeply buried insulated metal plates separated by some metres. Again it needs a site a long way from 50/60Hz mains wiring to be effective. The great benefit of this method is that it is totally passive, with no electronics to give spurious leakage currents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is worth repeating what is mentioned elsewhere on this site[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave]:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maxwell&amp;#039;s equations lead to the prediction of electromagnetic waves in a vacuum, which are transverse (in that the electric fields and magnetic fields vary perpendicularly to the direction of propagation)However, in a plasma or a confined space, there can exist waves which are either longitudinal or transverse, or a mixture of both. Rota&amp;#039; universal current propagates in a conductive medium such as salt water and the earth which for these puposes is a plasma. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For this reason the universal current is most likely a largely magnetic longitudinal wave which can only exist in water or the earth. This would also explain how Rota&amp;#039;s patented &amp;quot;Means of detecting Explosive Mines..&amp;quot; (L.G.V.Rota patents) in which the field produced by a paramagetic body entering the field of a telluric current produces a shock or turbulence detectable by his apparatus. It would seem reasonable to assume that a ship interacting with the very low frequency mostly magnetic telluric current field would have circulating currents induced in its hull and these would be detectable at a distance with a compass needle.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{|cellspacing=10;&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|&lt;br /&gt;
* One set of headphone&lt;br /&gt;
* two soft iron disks &lt;br /&gt;
* One plastic or Bristol paper disk&lt;br /&gt;
* A few inches of electric wire&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:exp1List.JPG |300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|- &lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|A wire is soldered at one disk. The three disks are then staked together like a capacitor&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:exp1Schema.png |300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Procedure &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &lt;br /&gt;
{|cellspacing=10;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=top|&lt;br /&gt;
Prick quickly the superior disc with the free wire while listening attentively with the headphones.&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:exp1Disk.jpg|300px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The observation==&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes it is possible to ear a small &amp;quot;click &amp;quot; in the helmet when the wire touches the disk.  Occasionally there are “good” series (3 to 4 clicks on 10 picks), sometimes nothing happens during ten picks.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The clicks appear in variable manner:&lt;br /&gt;
* At the moment of the contact&lt;br /&gt;
* Immediately following the contact break&lt;br /&gt;
* Half second after the contact break.&lt;br /&gt;
* Some days, it just does not work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Are these clicks purely random and all of them explicable by the electromagnetic laws? Apparently not. Louis Rota spent nearly 40 years listening to such clicks through more sophisticated apparatus,with atonishing results.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Genissieux_Laboratory&amp;diff=223</id>
		<title>Genissieux Laboratory</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Genissieux_Laboratory&amp;diff=223"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Genissieux ==&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00001 MaisonGenissieux.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|[[Image:A00087_Genissieux.jpg|thumb|]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=GoogleMap&amp;diff=225</id>
		<title>GoogleMap</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=GoogleMap&amp;diff=225"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;googlemap lat=&amp;quot;47.465373&amp;quot; lon=&amp;quot;2.482849&amp;quot; type=&amp;quot;satellite&amp;quot; zoom=&amp;quot;5&amp;quot; controls=&amp;quot;small&amp;quot; height=&amp;quot;450&amp;quot; width=&amp;quot;600&amp;quot; &amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
49.280925,1.052301, [[Mont Saint Aignan Laboratory]]&lt;br /&gt;
45.465373,4.482849, [[Genissieux Laboratory]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/googlemap&amp;gt;  &lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Test google map]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Is_the_Universal_Current_a_Zenneck_Wave%3F&amp;diff=227</id>
		<title>Is the Universal Current a Zenneck Wave?</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Is_the_Universal_Current_a_Zenneck_Wave%3F&amp;diff=227"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}} &lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:L&amp;#039;onde de Surface de Zenneck]]&lt;br /&gt;
{|&lt;br /&gt;
|width=200;|__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=bottom| What is Rota’s Universal Current in modern terms,? The problem has to be divided into two distinct parts, first, the overall concept of the Universal Current and secondl, the idea that the Universal Current consists of numerous components.&lt;br /&gt;
It is proposed here that the most likely candidate for Rota’s Universal Current itself is the [http://www.tfcbooks.com/articles/tws4.htm Zenneck Surface Wave]. &lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Zenneck surface wave == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Along with others, around 1906 [[wikipedia:Jonathan_Zenneck|J. Zenneck]] was attempting to explain how radio transmission could curveround the earth as was shown by Marconi’s early radio transmissions across the Atlantic. [http://caliber.ucpress.net/doi/pdf/10.1525/hsps.2003.33.2.369 Various theories] where around at the time one of which was Zenneck’s surface wave [[#ref1|&amp;amp;#91;1&amp;amp;#93;]]; which was shortly after formalised by Sommerfeld [[#ref2|&amp;amp;#91;2&amp;amp;#93;]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Zenneck surface wave is an electromagnetic wave which is conducted in the earth and along the earth-air boundary. It is not the same as the common radio frequency ground wave produced by the usual antenna configurations. To get a feel for its properties:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quoting [http://www.arcsandsparks.com/teslapage.html James Corum]:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The distinguishing feature of the Zenneck wave is the propagating energy does not spread like radiation, but is concentrated near the guiding surface.  Zenneck conceived that the earth&amp;#039;s  surface would perform in a manner similar to a single conducting wire and Sommerfeld had shown that an electromagnetic wave could be guided along a wire of finite conductivity”. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
James R. Wait [[#ref4|&amp;amp;#91;4&amp;amp;#93;]] states that:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;quot;The field amplitude varies inversely as the square root of the horizontal distance from the source&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;s interesting to note that Sommerfeld made a point of distinguishing between the &amp;quot;electrodynamic&amp;quot; surface wave and its Hertzian counterpart the space wave, believing that both components could be present in varying proportion in the wave complex.  It was Tesla&amp;#039;s assertion that the exact composition of the emissions was dependent upon the design of the transmitter. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the 1916 interview Tesla said, &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;. . . the mathematical treatise of  A. Sommerfeld,… shows that my theory is correct, that I was right in my explanations of the phenomena . . . .&amp;quot;  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The paper, &amp;quot;Uber die Ausbreitlung der Wellen in der drahtlosen Telegraphie,&amp;quot; [&amp;quot;Propagation of Waves in Wireless Telegraphy,&amp;quot; Annalen der Physik, Vol. 28, March, 1909, pp. 665-736] contained a formal analytical solution for the radiation from a short vertical monopole over a finitely conducting ground, and was written within the context of Zenneck&amp;#039;s 1907 formulation.  It posits, two contrasting concepts  which may be designated by the terms &amp;#039;space waves&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;surface waves.&amp;#039;  The Hertzian electrodynamic waves are [space waves].  Electrodynamic waves on wires are typical surface waves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The losses shown in the propagation of the Zenneck wave increase after about 30 kHz, so its usefulness, for the purposes of this discussion, are in the low frequency (LF) to the Extra low frequency (ELF) bands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Rota’s Universal Current == &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Rota’s 1919 patent number GB128624: Apparatus for the Concentration of Electric Waves, page 3 claim 45:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The apparatus shown in Figs. 8 and 9 is especially suitable for signifying the presence of a magnetic body which may be upon or in the water… and this body we admit may be a submarine.  Page 3 Claims 50,55 states: The idea will certainly occur that it is impossible to transmit through sea as it is true that sea water absorbs very rapidly electric waves but it must be remembered that the known electric waves are simply a disturbance of the magnetic lines of force instead of as we obtain in the present invention the production of real electric current. For this reason the absorption over a greater part of its travel and its production is dynamically stronger and more united. The wave therefore has the faculty of being perceived by the perception apparatus, being signaled at the receiving station with very delicate apparatus, that is to say by means of a telephone of the micro-ampere type… or by means of a galvanometer….for example the Deprez-D’Arsonval.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We know from Rota’s notes that he determined almost everything by experiment. When this patent was written he was working for the British Government’s National Physical Laboratorty , Teddington UK . This patent tells us some interesting facts:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rota must have been operating in the LF, VLF frequency range, since otherwise a galvanometer would show nothing, no rectification is shown on the patent not even a coherer, or even a mention of it .&lt;br /&gt;
* The fact that he received signals under water and notes the low attenuation, which he terms  “dynamically stronger and more united”  strongly suggests Zenneck wave transmission with the low 1/√(distance) attenuation as suggested by Waite. &lt;br /&gt;
* If Rota’s, cylindrical/ cylindrical placed strips parallel to the axis, configuration has any special virtue is not clear. The Zenneck wave will certainly be polarized so this might be the reason  for efficacy of his cylinder antennae.&lt;br /&gt;
* The cylindrical antenna was to be used to transmit and receive at sea. It is noticeable that the waves transmitted and received ship to ship though the sea had to be retransmitted through the air for reception by land based receivers, as though the signal were reluctant to leave the sea and travel over land. &lt;br /&gt;
* In the figures the transmitter is sketched as a spark gap excited step up transformer. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, regarding this patent there are several incomprehensible claims in it, passing over whether cylinders could be made to amplify any electromagnetic wave, the other claim Page 2 claim 15&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
“The battery ( elsewhere: battery, accumulator or dynamo) has as its object to reconstitute all the forces lost by passive losses, resistances and otherwise, and further to give to the energy of the wave its constitutive and primitive property”.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
“The cylinders increase the capacity and diminish the resistance and in union with the relative inductions and currents of the batteries they define the energy of the wave with intensity and phase desired and determined”. &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is not possible with the information  given in the patent. For the direct battery current to act on the radio frequency picked up by the antenna cylinders, some form of non-linear component or a thermionic tube amplifier is needed which is not present in the patent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[LGV Rota Patents| Rota’s patent GB129,059 1919]] says in claim 10:- &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot; margin-left:10px;  font-style:italic;&amp;quot;&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“I have discovered that there are certain telluric or earth currents which produce in the earth magnetic vortices. The presence or intensity of these currents is shown when they encounter a magnetic or paramagnetic body however small this may be. Due to this fact it is possible to recognize the presence of a mine, submarine ship or other magnetic or paramagnetic body…”&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today we are well aware that solar activity via perturbation of the earth’s magnetic field induces telluric currents in the earth. Rota’s use of these currents flowing through the sea again suggests VLF Zenneck waves, generated as a result of solar activity, of course huge magnetic disturbances will produce a mixture of electrodynamic fields and currents, some in the earth and some as VLF hertzian electromagnetic waves. Rota’s deeply buried antenna specifically detected deep earth current fluctuations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== The Metal Activation ==&lt;br /&gt;
The second problem: How does the Universal Current activate metals? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no physical evidence of low frequency electromagnetic fields producing decomposition of metals at the atomic level, where, according to Rota the “latent energy of the metal is released”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible that Rota was wrong and some other process was at work. The main evidence for the veracity of Rota’s claims are probably those of Dr. Kresser. Kresser challenged Rota to tell him what was wrong with a number of patients without any prior information. Apparently, Rota was completely successful. The essential point is that Rota used his sets of activated metals to do diagnosis, listening for reactions between the universal current active in the patient against those of the metals. Kresser seemed to have used the method himself using Rota’s apparatus but makes no comment on what the currents sounded like.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nub of the problem is simply that if Rota is right electromagnetic energy can activate the atomic structure of matter causing it to release energy even after the stimulus is removed. Furthermore, if the universal currents are electromagnetism then they conform to Maxwell’s equations, but must have an additional parameter which is the source of their power to awaken the latent energy of matter. There is no evidence that electromagnetic fields artificially generated in the usual way have this effect. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Bibliography ==&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;ref1&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[1]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; J. Zenneck,: “¨Uber die Fortpflanzung ebener electromagnetische Wellen langs einer ebenen Leiterfläche und ihre Beziehung zur drachtlosen Telegraphie,” Annalen der Physik, 23, 846 -866(1907).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;ref2&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[2]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; A. Sommerfeld,: Annalen der Physik 28(1909), 665—736:  Uber die Ausbreitlung der Wellen in der drahtlosen Telegraphie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;[3] D. A. Hill and J. R. Wait: ``Excitation of the Zenneck surface wave by a vertical aperture,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Radio Sci. 13, 969--977 (1978). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;&amp;lt;span id=&amp;quot;ref4&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[4]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; J. R. Wait,: Wave Propagation Theory, second edition, New York: Pergamon Press (1981). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*;[5] A. Sommerfeld,: ``The propagation of waves in wireless telegraphy,&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Ann. der   Physik, 81, 1135--1153 (1926).&lt;br /&gt;
== See Also ==&lt;br /&gt;
More on Zenneck and Surface Waves here&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenneck_wave]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G.J.E Goubau: Surface Wave Transmission line; US Patent 2,685,068&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=2685068]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
G.J.E Goubau: Launching and Receiving Surface waves; US Patent 2921277&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=2921277]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota%27s_Theories&amp;diff=229</id>
		<title>LGV Rota&#039;s Theories</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=LGV_Rota%27s_Theories&amp;diff=229"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Under construction&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* All matter is formed from universal currents.&lt;br /&gt;
* Each universal currents has its own specific properties, Rota had detected 361 different currents by the time of his death in 1951.&lt;br /&gt;
* Every chemical element is constituted of a different group of universal currents, copper, for example, is formed from four such universal currents.&lt;br /&gt;
* If an element is exposed to one of its constituent currents the element disintegrates, not explosively but gradually or more rapidly depending on the strength of the universal current.&lt;br /&gt;
* The constituent currents are held together by a &amp;quot;force of cohesion&amp;quot; which is related to gravitation but unlike gravity is polar.&lt;br /&gt;
* The huge polar force of cohesion is released when an element is dissolved by a constituent current and can attract or repel ordinary gravitation.&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetism is formed of five universal currents held together by the force of cohesion, three for magnetism and two for electrostatic forces.&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetic polarity arises from the polarity of the force of cohesion.&lt;br /&gt;
* Electromagnetism can be split into its universal current components releasing the force of cohesion.&lt;br /&gt;
* The properties of the universal current are heavily involved in the life process. The life process splits matter into its universal current components.&lt;br /&gt;
* Common physical instruments usually cannot detect the universal currents directly, only components bound by the force of cohesion e.g. magnetism, electricity and momentum are detected.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Layman%27s_Articles&amp;diff=231</id>
		<title>Layman&#039;s Articles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Layman%27s_Articles&amp;diff=231"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:03Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Les Articles de Layman]]&lt;br /&gt;
Layman wrote three articles about Rota’s work. Having seen Rota’s own notes, I can confirm that Layman’s articles paint a fair picture of Rota’s claims and though general are not exaggerated. These articles, which originally spanned several issues of the Modern Mystic and Monthly Science Revue, are condensed into one.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UNIVERSAL CURRENTS by [[Layman]]==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As Dr. Kresser once remarked: “It is the fecundity of a discovery that is the measure of its importance to mankind”. Anyone with eyes to see and a brain to think must realise that “Les Courant Universels” if they mean life and death to mortal man must affect everything in nature and more than that. For if man is the acme of creation so must all physical phenomena passive and active respond to if not result from the variable activities of these creative currents. What are they? From whence do they originate? The writer a mere layman can offer nothing in reply to these questions beyond recounting some oracular remarks made by Rota over a long series of years and of a few episodes in his long acquaintanceship which may not only be interesting but might help the minds of the more instructed to some definite conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
During the last war (WW1) , L.G.V.Rota had had small laboratories in Marseilles and later in Paris: He was a protégé in those days of an Italian gentleman, an Allied official of prominence who was aware of Rota’s antecedents.  At Marseilles in the late summer of 1915 Rota gave a demonstration of a metallic body, floating in the air. This was the “stablisiteur “ to which Dr. Kresser referred; it had very small canvas wings like an aeroplane, otherwise it was purely metal. The wings were added to deceive all except his friends and did not contribute to buoyancy or stability.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An account of this exhibition was given in Le Figaro of 15th September, 1915. The writer’s copy was “ annexed,”( but see page 54  below) so those interested might make it their business to look this up, Presumably old French newspaper files exist in some  French library in London’? The Italian gentleman died and his widow, an English lady, was unable to continue to finance Rota indefinitely. Then his troubles began. His in laboratory in Paris, during the war of 1914-18, was invaded and was broken up by persons who apparently wanted his “ secret” Rota himself suffering injury. He was then invited to London by some British naval men. Thereafter, he worked for a while for the Admiralty at Teddington, being engaged primarily and supposedly on the “Concentration of Rays,” the idea being the exploding of enemy ammunition dumps (at a distance), Needless to say, he was not successful. He had at this time no installation in France such as he had created by 1939, and was working’ on a false premise regarding these currents. However, it is a fact that the  relatively crude submarine detector developed during 1915-17 in the last war was based on Rota’s ideas and conception and that Britain started the recent war in 1939 with a detector; which though vastly superior, was a logical development of this. The basic principle was just that of Radar, that is; echo1. Rota was never given any public credit for this so as far the writer has been able to ascertain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was in 1922 that the writer of these reminiscences first made the acquaintance of Rota.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the early stages of this acquaintanceship Rota was very secretive, and used to speak of my secret,” which he said, he would never impart to anyone unless as he hoped he had a son who could follow in his footsteps one day. He seemed more than afraid that this secret would be discovered elsewhere, saying that, if it were given to the world, the world would destroy itself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As the years went by however, and after as he had candidly admitted he had been working on an erroneous hypothesis regarding the origin of these currents, he became more communicative eventually published in French, a small brochure of which his article in the July, 1945, issue of The Modern Mystic and Monthly Science Review, was an epitome. He was always very sensitive too of being scoffed at, as indeed he sensed he was; thus he would not come at all into the open until there was at least some irrefutable evidence that he was not either a charlatan or lunatic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier, he was pledged under an agreement with some British friends who financed him, to produce within a given time tangible evidence of the actuality of his discovery, as he subsequently described his secret.”2 He failed to do so in the prescribed the chief reasons being want of finance before his installation in France was completed. He had misjudged his, requirements, not least because of the said erroneous hypothesis as to the origin of .these currents. It was the embryo plant in France that caused him to realize the truth (as he sees it), and which taught him many things besides. The money was not really lost only his time was. In those days he had to stint to live as well to try and complete the installation in France.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==UNIVERSAL COHESION==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most one ever got out of him at the very first was, that these currents had an earthly origin and manifested in the abstractions we know as light Heat, Electricity, Magnetism, and Gravity. Subsequently, he never referred to Gravity but substituted “Universal Attraction,” and sometimes  Universal Cohesion.” The point to being made here is that he always regarded Gravity as a force which could be controlled but said little of Magnetism. As Solomon remarked everything be twain,’. i.e., male and female, manifesting positive and negative polarity as with electricity as indicated by plus and minus and in pendulum actions, etc. Hence if Gravity as the laity know it, be regarded as positive then there must be a negative form. Ergo, herein lies the clue to what we know as weight; Atomic Weight. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ANALYSIS OF METALS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later when he had become seemingly more familiar with these currents, Rota used to assert that one day the analysis of all metals -(and presumably of other things) would be expressed wholly in terms of these currents. Also that several of what were regarded as a single metal were actually composed two and sometimes more unknown metals. These perhaps are what to-day are styled Isotopes. He always insisted on extreme purity in the several metals used in his plant and apparatus. This purity seems to be as vital to his work as it is in developing spiritual power. He used also to scout Newton’s theory as presented but admitted the arithmetic of it. Likewise the atomic theory. Frequently he would remark, if you split the atom, “ you’ ave nulling at all”  By inference the power lies not in the atom but exteriorly to it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A physicist speaking a year or two before the war at a September meeting of the Royal Society put forward a similar thesis and in the October, 1945 issue, page 88 of this journal Mr. A. Annesley Voysey, questioning the accuracy of scientific theory regarding the explosive power of the atom writes: “Can we regard it another way as a local diminution of velocity in the cosmic energy, which thus suspends its power to pass and blows everything to pieces?”. This would seem to be in accord with Rota’s view. Since penning the foregoing the American account of the development of the atom bomb, published by H.M. Stationery Office mentions with some frequency the “ binding force of the nucleus”, which is significant. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rota’s successful debut at Marseilles made him confident of being able to fulfill his undertaking! To the writer’s knowledge he had begun the construction of at least three of such machines, if they can be so styled, and parts of the second were and possibly still are in London. A curious story attaches to that. These machines were all begun before he realized that his original hypothesis’ (though not his data)was wrong. Later he was absolutely sure he could do this but that it would require capital.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this period he used to accurately predict earthquakes, and showed an uncanny knowledge. In those days aeroplanes were primitive and made embryonic test flights and distance record flights. The courses that today would be regarded as nothing were well publicised in advance in the newspapers and often Rota would write to the Press saying that if that path on the particular day was adhered to the aircraft would crash. After he had, unfortunately, proved right his warnings were no longer ignored, it was noticed that on future occasions the flight would be postponed or the course altered after his warning had appeared.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==FORECASTING WEATHER==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the Weather, he used to say “with a hundred men to do the calculations and I could predict the weather over every hundred square miles of the world. Was this humbug or hallucination? The question arose in the minds of his best friends. Well, from the writers personal experience:- In the middle of March, 1924 Rota, a friend  and the author were driving in a taxi to lunch at a well known restaurant when number two of the party said, When is this miserable weather going to stop?. It was a gloomy Spring, rain heavy or bad light for days and no sun for weeks. Rota fished out a pencil, a stiff cuff and proceeded to do some calculations using the hieroglyphics he always employed and in less than a couple of minutes said, “It will be here until the 20th May.” Nor did it! The dull cheerless weather continued until on the afternoon of that day then a warm genial sun emerged flooding the scene and the change could be felt. From then onward good weather. On one occasion three gentlemen and the writer were taking leave of Rota on the 1st September, 1927, when the writer on shaking him by the hand  said:  I’ll come and see you again, at the end of November or beginning of December either on my way back from Spain….” What! he said, if you go Madrid get back to Hildenboro before 23rd December or will not spend Christmas with votre familie”, you mean? Is there going to be a bad earthquake?. The Lisbon disaster came into his mind, said Rota. ..Very bad storm at Christmas the  storm is here now.” He then went on to say storm was already brewing north of the Azores. Towards the end of November the writer again on his way to Madrid Asked about the storm, Rota said. “T errible! terrible! worse than I thought, cold! He begin to-morrow.” Rota was unconcerned by the warmer weather. On 22nd December however, the weather which had been warmer (writer returned 19th December) was followed by blinding sleet with a 60 m.p.h. easterly gales veering to. N.E. quickly changed to snow for another five days. Numbers of cars were buried and were not dug out for a month and many great telegraph posts were snapped like matches. Kent and Sussex were marooned for days. For some four or five days no ships crossed the Channel from noon of 23rd December. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A man able to forecast the weather with so far ahead obviously has knowledge denied to those of greater scientific renown.&lt;br /&gt;
This article is written at the request of the editor for the benefit of those whose interest and hopes have, been stimu1ated by the articles which appeared- in the July September, October, November and December issues of this journal under the titles of “Universal Currents and, Cosmo-Dynamism “ regarding the work of Luigi G. V. Rota, by a layman who knew him very well but who has not been in contact or correspondence with him since early in 1940.&lt;br /&gt;
Readers of these two exposes will no doubt have grasped Rota’s thesis regarding procreation, and that a healthy life depends upon the intensity and density of those Universal Currents dominant in the make up of individuals from the moment of their conception.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nevertheless, a certain amount of repetition by way of introducing the subject is unavoidable, so let it be emphasised that according to Rota: (1) the impacts and direction of these currents upon the earth do not change; (2) They have been the same from the Beginning; (3) they vary only in intensity and density, at some periods hourly. They may be strong in one area and weak in another at the same time. Early on Rota believed these currents had their origin in the earth and so styled them Telluric.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, failure to realise his then ambitions for a demonstration which would satisfy any layman of their existence, led him ultimately to conclusions which were all embracing in their scope, in the realm of therapy amongst other things. In this realm he has undoubtedly established indisputable claim to credence. Actually, he has always regarded his work in this sphere as a mere sideline, but his success warrants a like credence with respect of all those other potentialities, he visualizes, to some of which I will refer later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reverting after this overture to the question of healing, his method expressed quite simply is, to supply the invalid with &lt;br /&gt;
the “dominant” current and to some extent with a blend of the currents which constitute his physical and spiritual make up. There are two alternatives, one to send the invalid to live in a locality where his or her “dominant” or Life current is then strong and certain to remain so for some while; the other to make up a multi-metallic “block,” to yield this Life current in requisite density, and intensity, to do so he has to strike a balance between the currents -dominant. but innate in the metals composing the “ block.” More than this, however, he has to take into account the then dominant and other currents pertaining perpetually to the place in which the patient is residing and to allow for their behaviour during the next few months or years. Some have to be counteracted, some intensified, The making of a suitable “block” is therefore, a matter of very exact calculation, and obviously abstruse. It is thus too costly a cure to indulge in unless the patient is going to live a long while in, the same locality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notwithstanding this, in the interest of science Mr. Rota was doing this work for virtually nothing; he himself being financed, 1936/41 by a gentleman who died in the second, year of the War; a French Anglophile. Beyond the making of suitable blocks lies the “harmonizing” of their component metals which is done at the installation in France. This harmonizing is styled by Rota “synchronizing,” but he says that it is not the right word and that a new word is required to describe the whole process. It is done by Nature. That is, these therapeutic blocks, etc., are connected to several large blocks buried at varying depths in the ground over a large paddock behind his laboratory. These buried blocks are in some cases of a single metal and in others composed of several metals in layers. They vary much in size and weight and all have several leads in to his synchronizing room. Their numbers and variety make possible very many combinations of currents. Rota asserts that these buried blocs grow in power with every year that passes, but that does not permit the synchronizing to be done any the quicker.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NATURE OPERATES==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, a ton of metal can be synchronized just as quickly as 1 lb. can. No artificially produced energy are used, merely time and Nature and  Nature operates differently at different depths. I believe that the deepest block is set at about thirty-six feet down and the shallowest at about a yard. Rota has a listening post in the middle of the enclosure set about fifteen feet down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present, no English patient could be fitted out with a block and mattress that were not made and “synchronized” in France. Furthermore the mattresses referred to by Dr. Kresser were only made by one French manufacturer whose works may or may not have been blitzed.  The mattresses were not exorbitant in price but were luxurious to lie on. They were made of a relatively light wire, each spring having some thirty spiral coils. The coils are of some 9in. diameter at the top spiral to a diameter of about 4in. in the middle and then out again to about 9in. at the base. They are not separately made and then connected, but are all wound from one continuous length of wire drawn from a composite of metals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RESTORATIVE ENERGY==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These mattress springs have also to be “synchronized” with the block that is supplying them with their restorative energy. Incidentally, it may be remarked, that ultra purity is essential in all the metals that Rota uses for his several purposes. Furthermore no metal whose molecular structure has been impaired by a fall or a hammer is of any use. Rota works to a mathematical accuracy and. blemished metals upsets the fine balance required between the component metals.&lt;br /&gt;
On the hypothesis that it was intended to construct a base in this country for synchronizing these therapeutic blocks, mattresses etc. what would be necessary? Firstly, of course, the installation in France would have to be duplicated but not just anywhere. While there are a number of suitable sites about this country, if time is to be saved, the one selected must be on what Rota calls “on the same line” as the original in France. Years ago he had visions of one day constructing such an installation in Kent; Canterbury being on the same line of current or currents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a corroborative check here in that like weather conditions will be found to prevail on most days of the year in Canterbury and the original installation and to almost the same extent between that and London. The large “blocks”, required to be made and buried in the ground for such an installation could be “synchronized” in France prior to internment for immediate use when otherwise this process would have to be left to Nature for perhaps four years for the “blocks” to attain an adequate degree of potency. Some hundreds of yards of trenches and many pits would have to be dug, wiring laid and covered in and several hundred yards of aerial wires fixed to posts about fifteen feet above ground. Above all one very complex apparatus of some 7,000 small parts would have to be installed in the Laboratory, all likewise “synchronized.’. The parts of this all important original apparatus, which cost a great deal of money to construct were all made in duplicate and were once stored in this country. It should not take very long to replace them if the original drawings are not destroyed and escaped the prying eyes of the Germans. It was Rota’s dream that such an installation should be on a much larger scale than in France for other purposes and in his eyes of much greater import, which in their whole may be summed up in the phrase, the Peace and Prosperity of all mankind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==BIOLOGICAL DOMAIN==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before proceeding to mention such other potentialities and prospects envisaged by Rota, a few illustrative reminiscences of his achievements in the biological domain should be of interest. One of the earliest of these was related to the writer before he had contacted Dr. Kresser and when he was still discouraged by skepticism. The story was confirmed years later. One day the Cure of a village church near by who was aware of Rota’s ideas, told him of his concern lest he should lose his organist because of conjugal friction. After five years of wedlock there was no offspring and the Cure in venting his anxiety said,” I believe if only they could have a child harmony might result. Have you any solution? To which Rota replied, “Yes, perhaps, but I shall have to question them first”.  The Cure said he thought he could arrange for this.&lt;br /&gt;
A day or two later after he had time to make his calculations, he said.” I think if Monsieur and Madame will go and spend three months at P.” (e.g. in the Pyrenean foot hills}, “Madame should find herself enceinte before very long.” They went. Later came a letter saying that the lady had reason to believe she was pregnant, and in due course a healthy child was born.&lt;br /&gt;
Here the point may be made, that if anyone from England went to consult Rota for the same purpose, he could give them the required advice, as seemingly he is aware of the intensities of these currents at any place and at any date, way back into antiquity. Since those earlier days he has even devised a method of deducing by examination the time and place of conception if the client or would-be patient cannot supply the information. If this is fact, surely there is little to equal it in the realm of scientific achievement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==HISTORICAL CHARACTERS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was intriguing to hear him speculating (or was he?) upon the behaviour of some famous characters in history .&lt;br /&gt;
Of Napoleon he used to say that he could never have made a success of his Russian Campaign because both his mind and his body could only have been much below normality , during the crucial period especially when actually in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Kresser spoke of a little lad, the son of well to do parents, living in Paris who was always ailing and in a few months was so transformed by Rota that he resisted the infection of a virulent Influenza which had struck down  every member of his father’s household. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This gentleman was very friendly with Rota and one summer arranged to take him on a holiday trip to his native Savoy. A day or two before they were due to depart Monsieur L. said, that his mother , an elderly lady, was very ill and she might die at any moment, he must cancel the trip, Rota who presumably was acquainted with the cause and origin of her malady said she could not die before 19th October. So it transpired. &lt;br /&gt;
According to this strange man there is the substance of a reason in the Italian word “influenza,” e.g., influence. At one time he was always ready to forecast the periods of incidence of this often fell malady and to state whether the outbreak would reach epidemic proportions. Also he used to speak of some of these currents as being malefic to everybody one in particular which he called,  La vielle femme.[ = The old women ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==STREAMS OF ENERGY==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
May not the 361 currents he claims to be able to identify be likened to ‘streams of creative energy radiating from the Divine Mind and may there not be very many more?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writer, although he has traveled thousands of miles on the sea, and who has often crossed the Channel, always hated these crossings being a very bad sailor. Knowing this, Rota always advised him in advance of the best day and by which sailing on that day to cross.   The writer never once was misinformed by Rota yet he never made elaborate calculations. It was simply that he was almost daily and nightly listening to his currents. Anyone who knows the Channel well is aware of its vagaries especially near or in the Straits of Dover. It can be rough when there is no really strong wind, and not so when a really stiff wind is blowing (the direction of the of course makes a lot of difference). It can be smooth on one side of the channel and rough on the other, a rough sea can get up almost without notice. The reason for this panegyric is to lend support to Rota’s view that rough seas are not necessarily due to wind, though it may contribute. All storms, according to Rota, are due to a loss of balance between currents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cause of a high wind and a rough sea may be one current but not necessarily. .For example: A current of a certain nature (or frequency?) becomes dense “ and another Intensifies or another weakens excessively. This is rational explanation of the causation of earthquakes (not tremors) as well, but being aware apparently, of the law of the cosmic periodicity, governing the behaviour of these currents he correctly forecast both earthquakes and the weather. The clouds may be heavy and replete with water but there can be no rain without its current was another of his several oracula dictums. Also according to Rota, the Moon does not govern the tides but they are due to “the breathing of the earth”. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before we leave the matter of meteorology etc. there two more relevant items worthy of recall. The first relates to firedamp, which takes such .a toll of precious lives in coal mines. None can tell when to expect an onset of danger, yet if careful records over several years had been kept of its occurrence in Britain and the Continent, it. tolerably certain that a pattern would result from where some useful deductions might be made. According to Rota such onsets are not fortuitous but can be calculated well in advance in the same way as the weather. At one period when money was short and before his installation was equipped, he conceived the idea of making a small firedamp “ barometer “ to hang in the galleries of coal mines to be sold at about half a guinea each. He claimed that this gadget “ would give at least a month’s warning of an occurrence. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ANTICIPATING RADAR==&lt;br /&gt;
(see footnote on page 4 )&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The second item relates to flying altitudes. He had assured certain military friends that it was impossible for aeroplanes to fly above a certain height over a historically famous frontier region except on twenty or twenty-one days of the year. In other words, except on these exceptional days the planes would be well within range of the guns. Tests were made by the military and so it proved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a result of these happenings Rota was employed for, some months to make a secret survey of all the frontiers of that country for which he was paid well. Because of remarks he let fall regarding the location of minerals etc., Rota was also employed to locate the positions of arms and munitions depots over the frontier in foreign territory. Their positions he had already closely approximated by their reactions on his recording apparatus at the installation. For exactness however, Rota postulated that he must follow the frontier round with certain other portable apparatus; all incidentally unaided by electrical impulses. So it was arranged. Rota’s readings confirmed the positions of certain depots already known to the military and he located several others besides. This all seemed excellent to the soldiers until someone remarked that if he could locate these then he should be able to spot the French depots as well. Surement! said Rota, proceeding to indicate the whereabouts of some. This caused momentary consternation amongst the military who felt they were betraying military secrets.&lt;br /&gt;
A few years previous to these happenings, Rota, with such apparatus as he then had was able to follow the Italian General Nobile’s flight to the North Pole. He had in fact plotted his route and indicated the spot where the dirigible had grounded long before the latitude and longitude of the scene of the disaster had been determined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About October, 1939 Rota informed the writer by letter that he had good reason to suppose that. A secret enemy wireless station was operating in a certain part of these islands. This was duly reported to the proper authority, “who asked if it were possible for Rota to give the exact position”. Now because of the war, Rota had dismantled all of the overhead lines across his meadow surrounding the installation until it appeared again to be just the innocent paddock of a farmhouse. To supply the information therefore he had to re-erect all these aerials again, which he did.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About three weeks later he gave precisely the latitude and longitude of the spot; moreover a week or two after that reported that he had located two more, eventually pin-pointing these in the same way. These stations were still functioning when correspondence with Rota ceased with the invasion of the Low Countries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A NEW PRINCIPLE==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What is of significance, however, is what Rota had to say about these stations. Firstly he maintained that they were transmitting by means of some wholly new principle of wireless not by electrical impulse. Secondly, that the transmitters were situated on the sea coast yet in water about 200 feet deep. Thirdly, that they were transmitting only in one direction. Fourthly, that these transmissions could be picked up by submarines and that only if the submarine surfaced and relayed them by ordinary wireless to another submarine on the surface or to an aeroplane could the messages cross land. The sea was the medium. Here were a number of mystifying statements, which in those days might well cause scepticism and consternation.&lt;br /&gt;
He had arrived at an these conclusions just by listening without the help of electrical amplification. What led him to make these deductions? Primarily, his conviction that all metals have direction. The writer has always assumed this direction to be that of the dominant current which creates their respective substance. It will be remembered that, according to Rota, all crystallization originates from these currents and that they are constant in their direction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rota’s own belief was that the Germans had made this discovery in respect of one metal only and that by some, fluke they had “synchronized” this one metal and were making use of the energy so “attracted “ to transmit with.  Pondering over the matter it appears probable that these transmitters in Britain were designed to react to certain weather conditions so giving the Germans information vital for weather forecasting. Outside Britain it may have been otherwise and the spoken voice transmitted by the same natural energy; if indeed the transmitting force was such and not electricity. In the latter case the British  “Sono-Buoys“ which automatically informed aeroplanes of the where about of submarines would represent a parallel. Doubt on whether or not the Germans had stumbled in part upon Rota’s discovery that metals have “direction“ and were using just one metal as a carrier wave, arises from a warning given to the writer by Rota in November, 1939.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said in effect, “ If the Germans have made this discovery then it should, not take them long to achieve another short step forward when they would have at their disposal a means of destroying all the electrical generation plant in Great Britain and she would .be helpless.” Seeing that the only damage sustained by generating stations was from bombs and incendiaries, was he right in his first assumption concerning these clandestine stations with which the Germans were equipped at the outbreak or hostilities? If he was right then the, Germans failed to take the extra step referred to.  Certainly during the first six months of the war they seemed to have information of various happenings a1most as soon as they had taken place. Was this by norma1 wireless portable transmitters or, by means of such non electrical apparatus as Rota visualized from just listening ? The last two words may provide the answer for his claim was that only he had the means of audition beyond the Germans themselves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==FUTURE WIRELESS==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Electricity being a degradation of energy, what then is Rota’s idea of wireless equipment?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Rota messages transmitted by natural energy could only be received by a receiver having a diaphragm “ear drum” or reverberating face made from the same sheet or block of metal and “synchronised” (or the equivalent ) at one and the same time and for the same period as the transmitting unit. In making this statement the write adopts the hypothesis that this new method of wireless transmission which Rota undoubtedly believed was being use at these clandestine German stations in this country and elsewhere were designed to operate after a manner which years later he described as being the wireless of the future and which alone he held could be wholly private and untappable being quite unaffected by atmospherics. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Incidentally, another of Rota’s dictums is that what are styled atmospherics would not interfere with ordinary radio receivers but for the impurities in the metals used in their construction, which impurities in the metals used respond strongly to intensification of those currents which create these impurities coupled perhaps with a temporary decadence in the parent currents of the main metals used in the construction of the valves, aerials etc.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Purity again is the essence of good reception. Conceive then a block of metal to have been synchronised and then cut into tiny thin sheets or discs. Place these disks in say various parts of Australia keeping one at home and there will be a constant flow of affinitive energy from the one to the other in Australia for some years, which flow acts as a carrier wave. This is the foundation of wireless as Rota sees it. Amplification and neutralisation of locally interfering currents presumably would be cared for by suitable blocks at either end, similar to those blocks used with his mattresses etc. which are in effect batteries or accumulators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==[[Nature and detection of the Universal Currents]]==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Cecil_Maby_and_Bedford_Franklin&amp;diff=221</id>
		<title>Cecil Maby and Bedford Franklin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=Cecil_Maby_and_Bedford_Franklin&amp;diff=221"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
Under Construction&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Cecil Maby et Bedford Franklin]]&lt;br /&gt;
By Michael Watson&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1971 I was offered and accepted the research papers of J.Cecil Maby. Here is an outline of some research which seems to have a direct bearing on Rota&amp;#039;s work. The bulk of the work was done mostly between the first and the early part of the second world war. Neither Maby of Franklin knew anything of Louis Rota, which is not surprising bearing in mind the secrecy with which Rota surrounded his research between the wars.&lt;br /&gt;
Maby and Franklin, like Rota, found all metals, in fact, all elements emit beams which radiate in the horizontal plane, in specific directions and even electromagnetic frequencies also emit in specific horizontal directions! This throws light on some of Rota’s claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin and Maby found that these directional beams rotate every 24 hour through 360 degrees. Maby found that if a magnet is placed under/over the element under test then the angle remains fixed. The N or S poles rotate the direction of the whole set by 180 degrees. The earth’s vertical magnetic field is not quite strong enough to fix the direction, so a mixture of fixed and static beams is produced if a magnet is not present.&lt;br /&gt;
Here is Maby’s graph of what he calls the &amp;quot;fundamental ray&amp;quot; angle versus atomic weight/number:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                        &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Directional emissions of Elements versus beam angle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:W00001_Maby_FR_table.jpg|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Note the “Bomb Disposal Enquiry” At this stage they were employed by the British Government to explore the possibility of using their methods to find unexploded bombs. See Passive “Radar”… below)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
                        &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Electromagnetic Frequencies also have directions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:W00004_FrVersusFreq.jpg|600px|]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maby and Franklin used an ionisation counter to verify what had been found with a dowsing rod, in order to eliminated “wishful thinking” when subjective methods were used, although they frequently used the ionization counter alone. The ionization counter being statistical was slow while the dowsing rod was quick in the hands of a skilled operator.&lt;br /&gt;
As is seen in Rota’s medical applications, the human body contains the Universal Currents in an active state so it would not be surprising to find the human body sensitive to the same class of universal currents in the environment.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Background&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the late 1920&amp;#039;s early 1930&amp;#039;s T. Bedford Franklin found that the presence of deeply buried ore bodies produced a disturbance in the field strength of an early experimental medium wave broadcast station recently established in the UK at Daventry. He found that dispite the scientific view that such signals could not penetrate several hundred feet underground to the ore body, the field induced in the ore body was detectable on the earth&amp;#039;s surface and interfered with the directly received signal from the radio station causing a variation in phase and amplitude which was detectable with a suitable radio receiver and frame antenna. He set up a successful business finding ore lodes for mining companies being able to detect the depth and size of the lode with reasonable accuracy. The surface field patterns were very similar to diffraction patterns familiar in optics, so it was assumed that the same process was at work with radio wave patterns detected on the earth&amp;#039;s surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Around the early 1930&amp;#039;s, J. Cecil Maby found he could successfully dowse using a forked rod and when he later heard about Franklin&amp;#039;s work and met Franklin, he tried dowsing a site which Franklin had previously tested with his frame antenna and radio apparatus. Maby was amazed to find that he could detect with the dowsing rod similar field patterns to those which Franklin had found instrumentally.&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin was able to stimulate an ore body in dry rock at considerable depth using a 30 metre radio transmitter dispite the popular view that such frequencies could not penetrate that deep.&lt;br /&gt;
Maby found that an iron rod stuck in the ground would radiate beams almost N,E,S,W without any external excitation and they tried various radio receivers to detect these beams instrumentally finally using a super-regenerative receiver. &lt;br /&gt;
Franklin had a theory that very deep ore bodies were being shock excited by penetrating cosmic rays because the depth was frequently too great for radio waves to penetrate from the surface. This idea was generalised into the theory that a dowser was picking up radio signals originating from cosmic ray shock excitation of a buried object or ore body etc. Instrumental detection was very difficult although the signal was clear enough to a dowser.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Penetrating Radiation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maby found that magnets emit a penetrating dowsing radiation that could penetrate lead screens. This resulted in tests with ionisation counters. A geiger counter showed nothing, but a neon ionisation counter did detect the radiation. They noticed that heavy objects in motion were surrounded by concentric zones or shells detectable by a neon ionisation counter of the Wynn-Williams type. They also found that aircraft could be detected a considerable distance away with a modified version of the counter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;A Passive &amp;quot;Radar&amp;quot; or Aircraft Detector&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In about 1939 before the outbreak or the war they contacted the British Government about their aircraft detector which the called the &amp;quot;Fraby detector&amp;quot;. Professor Andrade, in charge of finding new inventions to help the war effort, sent two scientists to investigate and after several months of tests they produced a favourable report. Development continued until suddenly the Government lost interest. After the war, this seemed to coincide with development of centimetric radar.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fields Around Objects&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Franklin independently checked Maby&amp;#039;s findings presumably using his own dowser but he also used his own ionisation counter. They found that element such as iron copper tin etc all have a characteristic wavelength in centimetres which Franklin working on an analogue with x ray diffraction found was 2k√(atomic weight x atomic number) The value of k was about 1. This field was detectable with the ionisation counter as well as by dowsing means.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The extraordinary effect on radioactive bodies&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When Maby was trying a geiger counter he found that it did not respond to the dowsing field unless a radio active source was put in front of it. He used a pad containing a small amount of Radium Bromide. He was amazed to find that moving the geiger counter plus radioactive pad through the dowsing field caused a increased discharge when entering the dowsing field and a reduction in discharge when leaving it, so the response of the geiger counter plus pad depended on the rate of change of the dowsing field. Because the geiger counter was unresponsive on its own he checked the radiation output from the radioactive pad alone using a spinthariscope which is simply a fluorescent screen and magnifying glass to observe the scintillations caused by radioactive particles discharged from the radium bromide. He found that the dowsing field did indeed increase the scintillations when entering the field and decreased them when leaving it. (Because this is a rate of change effect the half life remains unchanged).&lt;br /&gt;
If we relate Franklin Maby&amp;#039;s dowsing field to the universal current, this supports Rota&amp;#039;s statement regarding the fundemental nature of the universal current and its connection to the cohesive forces that hold matter together. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maby and Franklin published most of this work up to 1939 and a compilation in 1966  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1)J.C Maby,T. Bedford Franklin; The Physics of the Divinig Rod, published by Bell 1939&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2)J.C Maby; Physical Prinscipals of Radiesthesia 1966&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3) T. Bedford Franklin; Radiations, British Society of Dowsers 1949&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4) J.C. Maby: Research Papers&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=An_Introduction_to_the_Mysteries_of_Ground_Radio&amp;diff=219</id>
		<title>An Introduction to the Mysteries of Ground Radio</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=An_Introduction_to_the_Mysteries_of_Ground_Radio&amp;diff=219"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T18:16:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: 1 revision imported&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Navbar1}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[fr:Une Introduction aux Mystères des Ondes de Sol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
__TOC__&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;copied from https://borderlandsciences.org/journal/vol/53/n01/Vassilatos_on_Ground_Radio.html&lt;br /&gt;
:(courtesy of Gerry Vassilatos from https://borderlandsciences.org)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;font size=&amp;quot;7&amp;quot;&amp;gt;G&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt;&amp;lt;font size=&amp;quot;3&amp;quot;&amp;gt;round&amp;lt;/font&amp;gt; Radio is a subject which has remained on the periphery of engineering discussions for decades. It has maintained its elusive and mysterious poise because of fundamental anomalies observed when its methods are utilized, anomalies which manifest when signals are both transmitted and received directly through the ground. The inability to adequately address the associated anomalies has produced a remarkable impasse among conventional engineers. Many highly qualified such persons are quite sure that the Ground Radio phenomenon is adequately explained through classic theoretical propagation models. Experimental findings however, have brought to our attention several anomalous features of this form of Radio propagation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Only an extensive and deliberated exploration of Ground Radio will prove our several discoveries in the art. Rudimentary and inexpensive in requirement, experiments with Ground Radio provide an endless source of anomalies. Experimental investigations of these methods may begin with as little equipment as a shortwave receiver, a copper pipe, and a length of wire. The rest remains in the strangely lost art of interpretation. The accurate interpretation of the findings derived through such experimentation requires familiarity with the pertinent bibliography. We hope that the reader is encouraged to duplicate and surpass these methods, as those who do so will not be without their due reward. The discovery of new and unfamiliar phenomena can be yours...when you take the first step. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
... (to be continued)...&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==TELLURIC CURRENTS== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The metaphysical earth currents were both observed and described in great detail by Fr. Athanasius Kircher. His writings preserve an ancient knowledge which concerned itself wholly with the vitality of the earth. The metaphysical telluric currents were known to permeate the world, the energies which mediating vitality. Maps of telluric currents were the prized possessions of geomancers, permitting the knowledge of vitality control on earth. It is said that wars were fought by the selective elimination or exaltation of specific veinworks in the telluric circulatory system. The science of Geomancy thus formed the mysterious historical backdrop against which a wide variety of natural observations were subsequently made.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With time, the experiential appreciation for the metaphysical earth energies was systematically lost. The more qualified scientific observers replaced their sensitive experience of telluric energies with a merely superficial observation of geoelectric currents. This schism has provoked the controversial thesis upon which our present discussion is therefore based. While some will be defiantly confident that experiential telluric energies are resolved into geoelectrical currents, we remain just as adamant in our absolute conviction that the experiential telluric energies precede and define the observed geoelectric patterns. This schism has not, and will never be resolved. So long as there are those who insist on observing the superficialities of natural phenomenon, completely obsessed with the kinematics of otherwise experience-filled phenomena, there will be a scientific conflict.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The filtration of highly selected portions of natural phenomena characterizes contemporary quantitative science. Until the scientific community becomes willing to admit the greater part of their experience, all considerations of natural phenomena will remain for them a blank wall of intensities and numerical values. Ancient Science connected its pursuants with an experience, one gained through direct physiological contact with the telluric currents themselves. It is in the active contact with these ground-derived currents alone that we recognize the true and fundamental continuum in which our world is set, an expansive experience by which we access and learn the ancient arcanum. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The discovery that various signal species could be both transmitted and received directly through grounded terminals, forms the fascinating subject matter of a largely forgotten historical record. In this regards, we find a technical bibliography replete with remarkable instances of early successful experimentation in the art of drawing power and signals directly from the ground. Completely ignoring the fact that a large bibliography of anomalies had been compiled by research predecessors, engineers of the time developed communications systems which relied entirely on electrical currents. As a carrier of code and voice, electricity was &amp;amp;quot;reliable&amp;amp;quot;. But with increasing engineering emphasis on electricity and electrical technology, the subject of geomantic energies was driven into forgetfulness. Thereafter, those who confused geomantic energy with electrostatic effects were the cause of the numerous controversies by which Late Victorian Science is characterized; endless confusions in terms and identifications.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the subject of long-distance communications was compelled to shift thematic emphasis away from the vitalistic foundations, it lost touch with an energy which did not cease exerting strong influences on the developing electrical technology of the time period. Only a few, now legendary researchers, continued the geomantic tradition. From the very first moment in which ground connections were established in a telegraphic signalling line, inventors and operators of electrical systems noticed anomalous energetic behaviors in the ground. The very first attempts at long distance telegraphy involved the burial of highly insulated double lines (Morse and Vail). Upon first closure of the telegraph key, the signalling components became so thoroughly suffused with charge that the exchange of signals became an impossibility.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In truth, the art of wired and wireless communication began in a reawakened appreciation of geomancy and geomantic energies. This remarkable reminder came about with the replacement of the original 2-wire telegraph line (Reusser, 1794) by the 1-wire method (Aldini, 1803), the latter requiring far less wire and several ground plate terminations. The telegraph stations of Morse used grounded plates, a means by which engineers imagined the &amp;amp;quot;necessary return current...through the ground&amp;amp;quot;. Wired code on a single overhead wire was thus &amp;amp;quot;matched&amp;amp;quot;  by an opposed ground return of charge, a condition which fulfilled the prevalent model of electrical closure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GEOMANTIC INCURSIVES== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As none of these researchers actually measured the elusive &amp;amp;quot;ground current&amp;amp;quot;, many engaged an imaginative freeplay in the artistic description of the same. Several patent drawings reveal a curiously geomantic flair, the meandering &amp;amp;quot;return currents&amp;amp;quot; flowing over land and stream to their terminals. Here we find remarkable evidence that these inventors were in fact engaging in a form of geomantic vision, describing an entirely different and more agile energy species than electrical current (Farmer, Ader, Frow). Toward the peak successful operation of telegraph and telephone systems, the proper placement of terminal plates was an absolute requirement. As this art demanded special ability, the first telegraph linesmen used the methods familiar to dowsers. The very placement of ground plates, poles, and junction boxes was, for these linesmen, completely predicated on the strong presence of upwelling energies from the earth. Empirical evidence proved these methods superior to &amp;amp;quot;resistance surveying&amp;amp;quot; in the placement of station plates and other components. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telegraph lines so constructed were possessed of a noumenous and suffusive quality. Natural geomancers had provided the means. Here was evidence that another energetic stratum was governing the development and limiting the establishment of long-distance electrical communications systems. The subjective experience of linesmen was ample indication that such a mysterious energy stratum was indeed present and active. Thus, the invasive energy demonstrated its ability to enforce certain restrictions on the establishment and operation of Telegraphy and Telephonic systems. The communications technology, which engineers imagined to be completely independent of natural agency, was being subverted by an everpresent geomantic influence.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Besides the obvious geomantic incursions, those which influenced the decisions of workmen and designers, the energetic presence made itself known in several other ways. Power literally appeared &amp;amp;quot;from the ground&amp;amp;quot; in many stations, a condition which Alfred Vail reported (1839). He found it necessary to progressively remove batteries from the first long-distance telegraph line, reporting this remarkable manifestation of energy to his elder partner, Samuel Morse. Lines operated on an energy which exceeded the battery supply, and ground-connective communications systems were especially prone to bizarre energy manifestations.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hoping to save the finance of excessive wire line, many telegraph systems implemented the discovery that code could easily &amp;amp;quot;pass through water&amp;amp;quot;. To this end, engineers experimented with the use of widely separated groundplates, a means which proved strangely successful. Experiments with ground-conduction established telegraphic contact through an isthmus (Morse, 1842), through streams (Vail, 1843), wide rivers (Lindsay, 1843), canals (Highton, 1852), across a bay (Meucci, 1846), through the earth (Stubblefield, 1872), and between distant islands (Preece, 1880). An accidental discovery proved that one longline system continued operating with great strength of signal, despite the fact that the line had been literally broken in several places. The realization that code signals could actually enter and traverse the ground for several hundred yards, and then reenter a grounded line, triggered a new revolution. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thereafter, combined wired and wireless links formed the greater portion of telegraph exchanges across the miles of North American countryside. Ground plates launched code signals into predetermined land tracts and waterways, signals being conveyed along specific subterranean routes. Signals passed &amp;amp;quot;into and through the ground&amp;amp;quot; to each next ground plate of a series. When reentering the next groundplate, signals continued through the overhead lines to their appointed destinations. Stations received very strong signals in this method, signals with great clarity and force. Here were the early beginnings of the conduction wireless methods, and relied on the mysterious nature of ground conduction and ground energy for their successful operation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was clear to linesmen and operators that the signal energy could not possibly be maintained over such long ground and water conduction paths without amplification. Some external agency was somehow augmenting and modifying the applied signal impulses. The anomalous functioning of these largescale regional signalling systems proved again that the geomantic agency was literally wending its way through the line networks. Not every such line operated in this manner, the geomantic currents selecting very specific paths for its operation. This topographic selectivity hailed attention back to the maps once treasured by geomancers. The augmentation of applied electrical energy was obvious. These specially placed telegraph and telephone lines operated for years without batteries at all. Station operators took this phenomenon for granted. Despite the &amp;amp;quot;long dead and corroded Edison Cells&amp;amp;quot;, telegraph station operators continued the powerful exchange of &amp;amp;quot;fat blue and sparking&amp;amp;quot; signals for decades (Lehr).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other researchers corroborated the fact that usable amounts of current could actually be derived from the ground, currents whose powerful displays permitted the elimination of battery cups and generators. The failure of all reductive electrical models to satisfactorily address these energetic characteristics became especially evident with the development of the &amp;amp;quot;earth batteries&amp;amp;quot;, an outgrowth of these telegraphic observations (Bain, 1849). These simple material composites, made to be buried in earth, produced currents not explained through electrolytic action. Small buried earth batteries developed sufficient power to charge storage batteries. They were also employed to provide telegraphic (Bryan, Cerpaux, Dieckmann, Jacques, Bear), and later telephonic systems (Stubblefield, Strong, Brown, Tomkins, Lockwood) with uninterrupted operating power. Neither decomposing nor failing with months of buried use, the mysterious earth batteries contain an essential mystery which electrodynamic models cannot adequately explain.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those who doubt these facts may attempt the simplest of experiments. Place two identical copper rods into the ground however distant your skepticism demands. The ground can be dry. Connect a galvanometer to each rod by means of thin wire. An anomalous positive reading results. This simple fact illustrates the concepts taught by Nathan Stubblefield, who stated that earth batteries do not generate electricity: they intercept and receive ground flowing telluric currents. If you wish to find strong telluric currents by this means, place one of your two ground rods into a tree root. The galvanometer should be wired close to this base. The other rod is wired and can be placed in sequentially different spots. Readings can literally &amp;amp;quot;pin&amp;amp;quot; the meter, holding it there for weeks. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Telluric incursives continued to &amp;amp;quot;interrupt&amp;amp;quot; all electrical communications methods which employed the ground as a medium of exchange. These incursives revealed aspects of the geomantic nature as each new technology was connected to the ground. The mere appearance of additional power was greatly outperformed when, just prior to the advent of Telephony, a shortlived revolution swept the Telegraphic World. Certain telegraph companies replaced all of their electromagnetic systems with the Chemical, or &amp;amp;quot;Automatic Telegraph&amp;amp;quot; of Alexander Bain (1849). The Chemical Telegraph regime utilized the electrosensitivity of special chemical papers to register incoming signals. Code impulses made their dark blue marks on the rolling strip of sensitive paper, the task of decoding having thus been made &amp;amp;quot;automatic&amp;amp;quot;. Because of the low power requirements typical to their method, the Automatic Telegraph lines were successfully operated across much greater distances than their electromagnetic counterparts.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the very first, some such Chemical Telegraph systems operated on ground power alone. Not only did these systems produce strong signal markings in complete absence of batteries, but partly coherent signals spontaneously appeared in absence of operators as well! The mystifying appearance of fragmentary sentences and geometric patterns was continually observed in idle Chemical Telegraph receivers, a phenomenon which has been discussed in a former treatise (Vril Compendium Vol. 3). Perceptive investigators clearly perceived that incursions of geomantic energy were dynamically modifying and augmenting every ground application of electrical energy. Such anomalous energy manifestations, which often revealed a perplexing time-periodicity, found no plausible explanation among the theoreticians. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the introduction of Telephony, the use of simple buried terminal plates was soon replaced by a great number of special articulate ground components. Again requiring geomantic sensitivity for their proper ground placement and orientation, these remarkable interleaved and multivented forms literally launched and received signals along selective topographic directions (Taylor and Muirhead, Lugo, Smith). Besides those anomalous power observations in telegraphic and telephonic systems, anomalous observations were noted with the development of wireless communications. The relevant bibliography is filled with instances of geomantic power incursions in wireless systems. These incursions, clearly understood by early wireless pioneers as effects of the earth connection, made their impact on the engineering community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GROUNDWAVE RADIO== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The late part of the Nineteenth Century was a rich and productive time for the empirical researchers, those who explored the deep mysteries of ground conduction radio. Such investigation produced a new world of possibilities in the Wireless Arts. Experimenters found distinctive differences when varieties of geometric shapes were simply buried, a series of discoveries having no satisfactory conventional explanation. A great many highly specialized ground &amp;amp;quot;antennas&amp;amp;quot; were developed and patented during this time period, a technology which provoked both disbelief and criticism on numerous counts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first vocal radio broadcast was engaged by Nathan B. Stubblefield (1872). Mr. Stubblefield employed special &amp;amp;quot;earth cells&amp;amp;quot; and long iron rods to transmit strong vocal signals &amp;amp;quot;with great clarity&amp;amp;quot;. These signals traversed a mile or more of ground, a coordinated conduction wireless system providing telephone service for a hardworking farm community. The Stubblefield Radio Method represents an essential technological mystery. His &amp;amp;quot;earth cells&amp;amp;quot;  never wore out, never produced heat in their telephonic components, and provided &amp;amp;quot;signal ready&amp;amp;quot; power at any given instant of the day. Being neither activated or assisted by additional battery power, the system was fully operational around the clock.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later critics attempted the reduction of the Stubblefield Radio System to mere &amp;amp;quot;subsoil conduction&amp;amp;quot; mode of transmission, but remain completely unable to reproduce the performance to this day. Mr. Stubblefield repeatedly stated confidence in the fact that his Radio System was performing an act of modulation, not a transmission of signal power. The preexisting &amp;amp;quot;electrical waves in the earth&amp;amp;quot;, he firmly stated, were the real energy carriers for his Wireless Telephone Exchange. The special &amp;amp;quot;earth cells&amp;amp;quot; were connective terminals, not power antennas; a means by which direct connection with the geomantic energy stratum was obtained. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In an entirely different regime of exploration, a regime having nothing whatsoever to do with waveradio energies, Dr. Nikola Tesla directed the construction of a massive radiating structure on the northshore of Long Island. His previous years of experience taught him the secrets concerning radiant energy and its effective propagation through the air and space (1892 to 1900). Understanding the means by which radiant energy may be more effectively beamed down through the ground, Dr. Tesla established the magnificent Wardenclyffe Station (1901). Tesla intended Wardenclyffe to be the first of a series, stations for the subterranean beam transmission of radiant energy. Propagation of very large diameter radiant energy beams had been found more effective for given power purposes, when conducted through solid rock. Tesla found that the earth was transparent to these penetrating straightline beams, and planned the use of deeply imbedded ground terminals in order to direct and launch his special radiant energy.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Tesla took special pains to establish the extensive underground conducting system in order &amp;amp;quot;to get a grip of the earth&amp;amp;quot;. This most complex construction operation, necessarily executed long before the great tower was erected, took place below the Power Broadcast Station. Tesla stated that this was the most difficult part of his construction operation at Wardenclyffe, the drilling of long iron pipes having first been driven down to more than 300 feet into the foundation rock. At a depth of 120 feet, Tesla excavated several radiating shafts, long hallways whose internal walls were covered with pitch and surrounded with iron pipeworks. These shafts extended outward at this horizontal depth for several hundred feet in all directions, a formidable ground projector. Beneath the central chambers of this Magnifying Transmitter, the deeply embedded terminals actually formed the primary beaming structure; a bizarre conception which was literally rediscovered in legal documents provided by Mr. Leland Anderson, and has since been experimentally verified by Eric Dollard. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fr. Josef Murgas (1906) produced a remarkable series of articulated monopole terminals. These coaxial coil monopoles were deeply drilled pipes, filled with mineral oil and activated by radioimpulses. With these designs, Fr. Murgas exchanged extremely powerful and static-free signals to great distances with very little applied power. The later proliferation of ground aerial designs included double grounded arches (Tesla, Collins, Ducretet, Musits, Pickard), underwater and underground coils (Jones), underground loops (Beakes), &amp;amp;quot;bent-L&amp;amp;quot; inversions (Appleby, Knoll), and underground channel-loops (Hanson). Of these buried ground systems, none were as prolific as those developed by James Harris Rogers (1913). Most properly categorized as buried dipoles, Rogers antennas rested across the subsurface horizon of the ground, and were relatively easy to establish.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Desirous of creating VLF and ELF transmission sites for oceangoing surface and submerged fleet vessels, ground antenna designers attracted the attentions of the NRL and other military research laboratories. In the effort to establish failsafe communications between command centers and distant fleet, ground surface, or submerged forces, military engineers explored both Rogers buried antennas and Murgas drilled monopoles. To the thrift-minded military engineers, the buried Rogers Antennas were more accessible than the more effective and world permeating Murgas designs. Placed into long plowed furrows, the various Rogers antennas provided clarified signals. Compared with the large overhead aerials of other designers, Rogers buried antennas performed in a remarkably constant and dependable manner. Producing strong signals, of both greatly depressed static and equivalent reduced distortion levels, the Rogers designs were prized by Naval Radio engineers.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rogers buried antennas were buried dipoles, a method application to an old design. Because the Rogers Antenna series were buried dipoles, their performance theoretically completely depended upon their compass orientations. The polarization of transmitted or received signals necessitated that Rogers Antennas be properly placed in the ground with respect to compass bearings, a restriction nonexistent with the superior Murgas Monopoles. But Rogers Antennas were admirably suited to the developing Naval Radio hardware. Driven by sinewave generators, rather than Teslian aether pulses, the Rogers designs operated in the Hertzian wave mode adequately enough to win military support. Few military experts bothered to recall that these designs were all purloined from directly from the Tesla patents, a fact which the genteel Tesla never bothered to cite.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Periodically classified and declassified, the Rogers designs and their modifications have formed the core of the military VLF and ELF communications arsenal. But most of the researchers instinctively sought out those monopoles which Fr. Murgas developed, and which the military had overlooked. Throughout the early part of the Twentieth Century, a great variety of ground antennas made their sudden appearance in the commercial radio market. Experimenters everywhere were discovering that different shapes and materials were capable of providing extraordinarily strong radio transmissions and receptions when simply buried.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==GROUND TERMINALS== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Attempts of devising newer and more effective ground antenna designs provoked several intriguing explorations. The most amazing discoveries included those made with relatively small buried metal forms. Radio rules changed completely when buried antenna were employed, the complete elimination of Hertzian dimension restrictions being the first observation. Unlike their aerial counterparts, buried terminals were not bound by those exacting requirements of wavelength. One did not require lateral dimensions equal to the normal shortwave aerial yardage, the first feature recognized by radio amateurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was indeed during this time period that the customary use of old iron radiators and large metal bedsprings, scrap metal surplus, became an experimental vogue with radio amateurs. These buried, highly articulated iron forms, provided powerful evidence that the ground antenna principle actually worked. In the classic models, the burial of any aerial structure represented immersion in a conductive medium. The burial of conductors in the ground was viewed as reduction to a uniform, neutral electrical gradient. This condition sufficiently neutralized all of the geometric differences within an isoelectric horizon. Electrodynamic theory stated that any buried metal composite, however &amp;amp;quot;variegated&amp;amp;quot; or &amp;amp;quot;articulated&amp;amp;quot; in form, would simply behave as a &amp;amp;quot;lumped&amp;amp;quot; resistance. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the use of variegated antennas posed no threat to the existing paradigm, academicians considered the concept of buried variegated antennas a theoretical impossibility. Indeed, those who examined ground aerial patents found completely problematic the notion that highly variegated geometric structures could demonstrate differing degrees of transmissive or receptive advantage. Electrical engineers insisted that the net surface areas of these buried &amp;amp;quot;articulate&amp;amp;quot; forms alone determined their resultant excessive performance. In this consideration, material composition did not matter. Conductivity was the prime factor. Differing only in their various surface areas, the only theoretical differences among buried geometries, in addition to those of mere surface area, were thought to be factors of electrolytic corrosion. The more pitted the ground contact surface, the more likely a buried object would become better conductive to signals. The microsurficial increase of surface contact through corrosive pitting was called to explain the &amp;amp;quot;additional gain&amp;amp;quot;.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the electrical merits of buried materials were supposedly the simple result of surface area and the effectively moved electrical volume, the result of this inherent surface area, no special discovery was acknowledged among the authorities. But empirical determinations proved that different geometric shapes and (more unbelievably) different material composites, actually did effect an enhanced &amp;amp;quot;launching&amp;amp;quot; of radiosignals far in excess of their calculated surface area. Solid plates of calculated equivalent surface did not perform as magnificently as the buried radiators or bedsprings.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
he articulated exposure for potential conduction increasing to or from the surrounding ground.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But empirical research consistently overturned each of the theoretical contentions, proving by incontestable demonstration the superior signalling characteristics of articulate ground terminals. Anomalous signal strengths were both transmitted from and received through ground transmitting systems far in excess of intensities or topographic distances declared possible by theory. This was particularly true when the ground transmitting antennas were powered by spark-generated, asymmetric impulse currents. Signals were somehow being &amp;amp;quot;collimated and constricted&amp;amp;quot; within the ground proper. This constrictive action did not explain all of the observed signal intensities. Evidence had again suggested that the ground was &amp;amp;quot;leaking&amp;amp;quot; a non-electrical component up into both the electrical systems and their emerging signals.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fact, several widely advertised and highly successful designs included the &amp;amp;quot;Yale Ground Hog&amp;amp;quot;, the &amp;amp;quot;Subtenna&amp;amp;quot;, the &amp;amp;quot;Aeroliminator&amp;amp;quot;, and the  &amp;amp;quot;Subaerial&amp;amp;quot;. These few representatives demonstrated the superiority of ground antennas, a validity which literally emptied the stock rooms of each ground antenna distributor. Dr. F. L. Satterlee, an X-Ray specialist, developed several &amp;amp;quot;tuned ground&amp;amp;quot; radio receivers. Implemented by The Moon Radio Company, these radiosets placed their performance boasts on a remarkable &amp;amp;quot;antenna-free&amp;amp;quot; operation. The principle advantage of these ground antennas was their static-eliminating nature. The ease of their installation and maintenance combined great signalling efficiency. Several of the commercial units needed only to be connected with a cold water pipe, their powerful and &amp;amp;quot;static-free&amp;amp;quot; reception being unequalled by the more conventional &amp;amp;quot;aerial receivers&amp;amp;quot;. Additionally, waveradio receivers produced by The Moon Radio Company operated during normally impossible meteorological and geophysical conditions; a condition well described by Nikola Tesla. A great many inventors continued producing truly amazing diversity in the &amp;amp;quot;ground antenna&amp;amp;quot; format. Throughout this time of amazing and anomalous discoveries, the empirical method led the way. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==NATURAL AMPLIFIER== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It had been clearly observed by a number of experimenters that the environment exerted strong and dynamic action on transmitter signals. It was long known that this mysterious energy species could actively charge ground-connected radio systems in absence of applied power, the early experiments of Loomis having established this principle (1862). This agency was very obviously possessed of an inherently superior articulate nature, being able to distinguish and energize buried material composites and varied geometric forms. In addition, the energetic ground agency seemed able to selectively seek out, constrict into, and intensify the incoming signal power of distant stations. There were obviously other influences which determined the nature of ground-traversing signals. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Experimenters realized that these effects differed with both the methods used in obtaining the spark energy, the manner in which disturbances were launched into the environment, the grounds into which signals were launched, and the specific directions along which they were launched. The spark applications of small experimental radiotransmitters produced signals of unexpected large volume at great distances, empirical evidence of an unexplained signal &amp;amp;quot;amplifier&amp;amp;quot; in the natural environment (Appleton and Barnett). VLF amplification effects had been empirically recognized among radio engineers on both sides of the Atlantic. In fact, the very first historical Transatlantic Signals of Marconi were problematic from every engineering standpoint. The calculated losses, theoretically expected of these signals, were far too great to account for his first claimed successes (1901). This was a fact which provoked many to doubt and criticize Marconi&amp;amp;#146;s claims in the venture. Later repeatable demonstrations of the VLF amplification effect evoked few suggested explanations from the engineering community. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept that signals could acquire additional energy from an unacknowledged geomantic source was not readily received by the academic community. Some experimenters initiated dialogue on the possible gain of signals which had traversed the geomagnetic field (Prentice). These gains were not the simple result of  &amp;amp;quot;standing waves&amp;amp;quot;, nor the result of Hall Effect intensifications provoked by launching signals across the geomagnetic field. The perplexing effect was noted across the entire radiofrequency spectrum, from VLF radiotelegraphic to shortwave radiotelephone services. Unlike the identical phenomena which took place in wired telegraph and telephone lines, these effects were taking place in complete absence of wire. But what dynamic agency was literally magnifying each relatively small initial signal?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the installation of multiple Marconi Transatlantic Stations, it quickly became known that transoceanic VLF magnification phenomena were only obtained when signals were launched along highly specific &amp;amp;quot;launch paths&amp;amp;quot;. Conformity with these &amp;amp;quot;launch paths&amp;amp;quot; produced undistorted signals of unexpected great power and presence. VLF signals which were not applied to the special launchpaths, were simply lost in transit. The Marconi World Radio Circuit relied these very obvious environmental controls, but it was quite impossible for engineers to follow the exact pathways of these suboceanic signals. It was first thought that the phenomenon had much to do with the submarine ground itself. By assuming the existence of special highly conductive marine geostrata, it was imagined that a simple geological survey could codify the selection of Marconi Station sites.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But no such geological formula or pattern was ever found, to the great consternation of engineers and theoreticians alike. Directed along identical suboceanic geostrata, the very same VLF signals encountered unexpected and unexplained high signal resistivity; a frightful realization for those whose labor was expended in the building of several Marconi Stations. What was the strange &amp;amp;quot;absorptive potential&amp;amp;quot; by which a launched signal could simply be drawn across a specific launchpath? If not in the material strata of submarine geology, where then was this mysterious &amp;amp;quot;absorptive potential&amp;amp;quot; contained?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several sites were quietly abandoned by the Marconi Company, the matter being privately considered for very obvious business reasons. The prospect of statistical failure in the &amp;amp;quot;scientific&amp;amp;quot; selection of VLF launchpaths displeased Marconi greatly. The use of dowsing methods would be very &amp;amp;quot;bad for business&amp;amp;quot; if the fact became known to the scientific community at large. These factors eventually drove Marconi deeper into a study of shortwave aerial phenomena. Other radio station engineers found it necessary to select station sites through &amp;amp;quot;alternative&amp;amp;quot; or &amp;amp;quot;geomantic&amp;amp;quot; means. This renewed awareness of geomantic energy, as well as the role of special points and pathways in effecting long distance communications, provoked a hostile and derisive reaction among conventional engineers. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==SHORTWAVES== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The advent of shortwave radio systems however, produced intriguing anomalies, which found neither immediate theoretical models nor solutions. Unable to account for the divergent signal strengths noted between separate aerial or ground contacts, fact-finding empirical research was again engaged. The models which theoreticians developed postulated that a loosely linked &amp;amp;quot;skywave&amp;amp;quot; and &amp;amp;quot;groundwave&amp;amp;quot; were responsible for the anomalous reception effects. In this analysis of waveradio transmitters, a conduction wavesignal &amp;amp;quot;through the ground&amp;amp;quot; was selectively either neutralized or intensified by an aerial signal &amp;amp;quot;through the sky&amp;amp;quot; (Breit and Tuve).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the newly discovered ionized atmospheric layer neatly providing &amp;amp;quot;skipping&amp;amp;quot; reflectivity for transmissions, the model was complete. Accordingly, the proper phasing of skipped skywaves and groundwaves produced resultant signals of unusual strength. Improper phasing produced received signals were weak or even absent. It was then easy to comprehend the varying nature of shortwave signals whenever encountered. One could find reasonable explanation for variable signal strengths throughout the day, month, and year. &amp;amp;quot;Skipping&amp;amp;quot; skywaves met with continuous groundwaves to produce all of the observed signal receptions. Phase shifting explained all of these variations. Or did it?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of very long, close-ground antennas was early implemented by those who sought the development of special aerial-ground hybrid antennas. The &amp;amp;quot;double ground&amp;amp;quot; aerial employed an elevated line with grounded ends. This format was limited by its orientation requirements, often acting as an excellent directional detector of distant stations. Extremely low aerials were developed and used in 1911 (Kiebitz), often extending to nearly 1000 feet in length and being poised to within a yard of ground level. In 1918, a similar system (A. Hall) placed 2700 feet of insulated cable along the ground surface, and claimed excellent reception characteristics.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The famed &amp;amp;quot;Beverage Antenna&amp;amp;quot; (patent 1,381,089), was the result of experiments with several thousand straight feet of wiring on tall insulating posts, a design which attracted the fortune-aimed attentions of RCA. Wishing to break the existing market on special beam aerials, this design formed the means by which Marconi monopolies on the &amp;amp;quot;bent-L&amp;amp;quot; aerials were broken. The receptive clarity of this design increased with proximity to ground. RCA could not infringe on the Rogers designs, or those of others, whose buried ground antennas produced better signal strength.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These horizon-hugging aerials provoked controversy because of their supposed necessary &amp;amp;quot;management&amp;amp;quot; of a mixed sky and ground wave complex. Experiment proved that increasing elevations of the Beverage Antenna resulted in a pure and noisy skywave signal, with the greatest signal intensities being derived with the line placed as close to ground surface as possible. In some cases, these ground-parallel aerials were poised on insulators 12 foot or less for best effect. Being the design which represents the theoretical midpoint, between the buried Rogers dipole and the Marconi &amp;amp;quot;bent-L&amp;amp;quot;, the Beverage Antenna reveals that ground currents and ground signals are indeed distinct in origin and species. These results helped to convince many that the proposed &amp;amp;quot;nearzone-farzone&amp;amp;quot; radio principles were absolutely mistaken. In fact, a special theory was developed to &amp;amp;quot;explain&amp;amp;quot; the superior operation of the Beverage Aerial. (All of these patents and articles are found in Vril Compendium Volumes 9 and 10).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A great many popular radio magazine articles were devoted to the unusual reception of signals through the ground alone (Volume 8, Vril Compendium). To the amateur experimenters of the time, it was all too apparent that the theoretical assessments lacked reality. Those who studied radio propagation phenomena for military applications could not account for the fact that far too powerful ground signals continued with increasing range from their sourcepoint. By comparison, their aerial signal counterparts were far too weakened by the journey. Experimenters found that the &amp;amp;quot;skywave-groundwave&amp;amp;quot; model did not explain the continued magnification of signals &amp;amp;quot;received through the ground&amp;amp;quot;. When compared to signals &amp;amp;quot;received through the air&amp;amp;quot;, the ground signals were persistently more powerful, and far less eroded by static.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of the many energetic interactions occurring in and among spark discharges, Hertz chose but two for analysis (1887). Convention has agreeably restricted its considerations to the same, affirming that only two fields of influence make themselves manifest at close distances from a spark. The induction field, and the &amp;amp;quot;radiowave field&amp;amp;quot;. Induction field effects rapidly fall away with the inverse square of distance from a spark center. The &amp;amp;quot;true radio energy&amp;amp;quot; is that wave energy which loses intensity with the inverse distance from a spark center. This difference of intensity with distance from the spark center defines the radiofield. Radio texts described the &amp;amp;quot;nearzone&amp;amp;quot; (induction field) and the &amp;amp;quot;farzone&amp;amp;quot; (radiofield). Patent examiners used this model to eliminate all but the Marconi claims for wireless transmission of signals, a tragic reduction. Far more important demonstrations proved the superiority of geomantic radio principles. Certain highly qualified experimenters disagreed with the simplistic Hertzian view, and contradicted the views of a growing mainstream (Stubblefield, Tesla, Massey, Moray).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some thought that the induction field was the source of the unusual ground signals, the electrostatic influence which induced electron oscillations in the rock immediately beneath transmitter towers. Much improved ground configurations were thought to provide additional power to these relatively weak induction oscillations. Large area copper screens or grids were pre-buried long before transmitting towers or aerials were erected. These conductive screens extended outward from the central transmitting axis for several hundred yards in some instances. Thus directly applied, ground currents were given enormous impulse, a possible reason for the strong and predominating reception of local stations in neighborhood receivers. Theoretically, these induction sources were incapable of propagating beyond one quarter of a wavelength from their tower centers. Deep VLF ground currents of 10 kilocycles were therefore not to be received beyond 15 kilometers from their source. The transmission of 3 megacycle signals would, according to these expectations, produce ground currents undetected beyond 250 feet from their source.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These &amp;amp;quot;nearzone-farzone&amp;amp;quot; models did not explain the true signal strength received through ground antennas. Why for example, could VLF signals be received from distances much further than 10,000 miles from their aerial gantries? Why were shortwave signals routinely received from distances surpassing 15,000 miles? Nevertheless, the ground antenna made such signal reception possible. One may yet demonstrate these dynamics with rudimentary ground rod antennas, a technique which will shortly be described. The &amp;amp;quot;nearzone-farzone&amp;amp;quot; model does not explain why VLF signals are only received along specific constrictive paths, a mystery which deepens when it is realized that such conductive ground paths are never found along strictly geodesic sections. Field distribution experiments show the meandering nature of VLF signals across regions of ground, a fact which correlates their much-amplified propagation with geomantic current paths.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There were, in addition, several remarkable reversals of these same theoretical expectations. Why, across certain locales, was it impossible to receive the powerful shortwave transmissions of a station some several hundred yards away in plain sight? &amp;amp;quot;Radio blindspots&amp;amp;quot; could not be explained on the basis of earth conductivity or geophysical characteristics alone. These glaring propagation discrepancies posed neither problem nor threat to the empirical researchers, who formulated their own naturally accurate models. The anomalous &amp;amp;quot;blindspots&amp;amp;quot; and &amp;amp;quot;freak transmissions&amp;amp;quot; which the routinely observed, were exceptions to the theoretical models. Such notable and unexplainable instances, while continuing to plague the modelmakers, provoked far too little academic interest (Hollingworth, Quack).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This experimental example offered a most startling clue to the mode of transmission actually responsible for the operation of buried antenna designs. The &amp;amp;quot;skywave-groundwave&amp;amp;quot; model presupposes that a singular radiosource will produce a singular radiating wave, half of the wave propagating through an aerial route, the other half being immersed in ground. Passage through the atmospheric route gathers static signatures and other distortions which are supposedly induced throughout the wavefront. This aerial noise is transferred and distributed throughout the advancing wavefront. Being absolutely tied to its aerial portion, the ground wave of any signal must therefore contain each acquired noise signature. The same holds true when the ground signal acquires static and distortions along its earthen propagation path. Then, the aerial portion receives new static signatures as a coequal distribution from the ground up. But all too many occasions prove the absolute contradiction of this model, and ground antennas provided the incontrovertible evidence.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Buried terminals gave the clearest proof that aerial signals and ground signals were of completely different origin, those of the ground having the most obvious source in a powerful autodynamic matrix. Aerial waves were so obviously dissolved and &amp;amp;quot;digested&amp;amp;quot; in transit from their distant sources, while ground currents often demonstrated anomalous intensification in transit. It was furthermore quite obvious that electrical currents were not responsible for the ground currents beyond the theoretical quarterwave limits. Signals received through the ground were clarified and strong, even when aerial sampling proved that there should be only a static &amp;amp;quot;hiss&amp;amp;quot;. Experiments have shown that the sometimes &amp;amp;quot;wavering&amp;amp;quot; behavior of ground received signals are the result of completely different origins, a dynamic response to completely distinct causes.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Added articulate dimensions made their appearance in a regime of improved ground antennas. Some designs employed chemical saturations to produce greatly clarified and intensified signals. The revolutionary approach began as a chemical treatment to existing ground terminals, a treatment giving superior empirical results. Chemically treated terminals brought a complete eradication of static. The chemical of choice for these &amp;amp;quot;treatments&amp;amp;quot; was copper sulfate, the watery solution being liberally poured upon the buried terminal until the soil became a slurry. Allowed to dry out, these terminals displayed their enormously improved outputs. In other such experimental arrangements, copper sulfate solution was placed in a large porous cup. Contact was made with the solution with a metal rod. This design completely eliminated common static and other crackling noises, a significant improvement which also provided new insight into the nature of ground signals themselves.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The performances of chemically treated ground antennas was not well comprehended, it being simply assumed that the earth-permeating solutions projected a conductive horizon beyond the antenna itself. Poured into the ground and allowed to dry in situ, such solutions were thought to extend a wonderfully articulate matrix of &amp;amp;quot;fingerlets&amp;amp;quot; beyond the metallic antenna framework. Crystalline, complex, and replete with dendritic projections, such arrangements became &amp;amp;#145;woven into the earth&amp;amp;quot;. How did such an underground crystalline complex manage to multiply signal conductivity, while depressing all of the expected levels of static? Ensheathing the metallic framework, the crystallized solution represented a non-conductive envelope. How conductive was the crystallized &amp;amp;quot;matrix&amp;amp;quot; at all? Electrically unresponsive in its dried crystalline form, any such copper sulfate sheath should have blocked the entrance of all purely electrical currents. What carrier was then delivering its obviously improved signals?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case study was completely corroborated in the simpler instance of an insulator-ensheathed copper rod, where clarified signals of great strength continued to be received in obvious absence of the electrical carriers (Lehr, Theroux). Examples such as these actually challenge common notions concerning the nature of ground signals, obviously not the result of electrical waves at all. When compared with the accompanying aerial signals, a contradiction in theoretical prediction was obtained. Aerial signals would prove to be replete with static signatures. Were the skywave and groundwave each coequals, linked energetic expulsions from a common source, then each should have delivered the identical static events. But the addition of chemical solutions to the ground amplified and clarified the incoming signals, proving that ground signals are of an entirely different class and species of signal...having nothing to do with their aerial mirror-partners. How then did the addition of an electrically non-conductive crystalline matrix actually produce better reception through the ground antenna? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==BIODYNAMIC INTERACTION== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The exchange between electrical signals and geomantic currents produced remarkable transformations, energy exchanges yet requiring exhaustive study. The manner in which articulate messages actively relate with their electrical carriers is improperly understood. In the biodynamic model, intelligent expressions constrict toward the center core of their carrier streams, becoming a tight thready current. The electrical carrier streams themselves expand away from this central thready core, losing integrity with distance. It was well known that certain geomantically densified regions were notorious eradicators of electrical signals, the legendary &amp;amp;quot;blindspots&amp;amp;quot; which characterized certain subequatorial districts. In these biologically active zones, where jungle growth was most highly accelerated, radio signals encountered impossible distortions and indefinable interruptive influences. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The significant distinctions of ground-derived currents from electrostatic or electrical currents required analytical methods not willingly engaged by the convention. Nevertheless, the incursions of unknown or forgotten energy strata refused to disappear. These manifestations, which became complicated with electrical applications, made their presence continually known. These pure geomantic currents possessed distinctly biological attributes of catabolic growth. Geomantic energy perpetually overpowered and dissolved every electrical application into the ground (catabolic reaction), while automagnifying its own potential (growth behavior) against the invasive electricity (immune response). In this process, communications signals were very apparently amplified. The bizarre amplifications most occurred when signals traversed regions of high geomantic current densities. This is why so many experimenters observed the topographically determined signal magnifications across specific locales.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1904, one experimenter rediscovered that the bioactivity of thriving trees can provide an astounding source of radiosignals, a method referred to as &amp;amp;quot;floraphony&amp;amp;quot;. When connected to specific spots on tree trunks, the use of a simple nail probe resulted in the anomalous powerful reception of radiosignals from 18,000 miles distance (Squier). Indeed, the interactive relationship between electrical and geomantic energies has remained singularly mysterious. For those who do not comprehend the fundamental differences and distinctions between the energies involved, only the futile shuffling and reshuffling of the &amp;amp;quot;four forces&amp;amp;quot; remains: an academic card game which, very unfortunately, will never produce a completely satisfying explanation. The associated list of anomalies continues to assert its presence, one which manages to topple the house of cards with every new deal.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The general social lack of sensitivity to bioenergies has contributed to the malaise of the scientific research community, a malaise which motivated Eighteenth Century experimenters to forsake their roots in Vitalism. The unfortunate consequent fixation on the discovery of currents and energetic influences, abnormal to the bionatural environment, has enslaved civilized humanity to an inferior technology, a degenerate mindstate, and a completely irrelevant world model. The interaction between geomantic and electrostatic current is the result of antagonism between two completely opposed species. Geomantic currents are far more powerful in their technological potentials, an energetic foundation which sensitives have long anticipated. The accumulation of phenomena, by which geomantic energies are transformed into the utilitarian needs of our world, are all that is lacking in this regard.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far not confined to qualitative methods, geomantic energy was quantitatively found to be possessed of biological characteristics not normally attributed to either electrostatic fields or electrical currents. From archane times, geomantic currents were known to flow through the ground in meandering pathways. The geomantic matching of large VLF aerials became common practice for the launching of signals along the mysterious magnifying paths, paths which meandered and &amp;amp;quot;wandered&amp;amp;quot; across continental topographies. The veinlike &amp;amp;quot;woivres&amp;amp;quot;, formerly identified and mapped by medieval geomancers, were associated with uncertain geophysical associations (Charpentier). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Direct connection with aerial, elemental, and ground-sourced energies produced a wide range of otherwise unexplained effects. These effects were repeatedly reproduced in apparatus requiring only monopolar ground terminals and variable tuning capacitors. The discoveries made by the Chemical Telegraph proved that the ground emergent energy actively organizes the chaos of sensitive emulsions into distinct patterns. These mystifying patterns and hunting fragmentary messages, revealed the literal &amp;amp;quot;dark structure&amp;amp;quot; of the ground, a structure which completely dominated every ground-launched electrical signal. The geomantic structure ruled and governed every wired, ground-wired, or radio signal which electrotechnology had applied to the ground. Signals were shunted, interrupted, magnified, reduced, constricted, redirected, divided, and recombined as each encountered the geomantic structure. The distinctly biological nature of the geomantic structure was thus clearly revealed. It is the same structure which ancient geomancers saw in the pure mode, a radiant and multicrystalline form which permeates and sustains the geological matter of earth. Fluidic streams form the facets of this black radiant structure, the &amp;amp;quot;geomantic&amp;amp;quot; currents of which we have spoken. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Explorations of the pure geomantic energies required very simple equipment. Researchers found it possible to extract enormously potent geomantic currents. Employing little more than a grounded rod or plate, and in the complete absence of additional (electrical) energy, geomantic energy was drawn up to the surface and selectively entuned. The grounded instruments used in these wonderful explorations were the simple and familiar diagnostic tools of the telegraphic and telephonic engineers: Wheatstone Bridges, decade resistors, and variable capacitance batteries. The strange and cyclic activation of chemical telegraphs was tested and proven, the results mystifying. When these components were connected to one or more buried plates, the apparatus became strangely charged with a neutral energy. The Patent Archive is pleasantly &amp;amp;quot;interrupted&amp;amp;quot; with the occasional exceptions provided by these research purists, who insisted that geomantic potentials were far more potent and capable than electrical energy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Those ground-oriented systems, which derive their operative energy directly from articulate environment, have experimentally proven their worth. Reproductions of a great many such devices has produced the surprising success by which we have experienced a personal Scientific Renaissance. Geomantic energy is capable of marking sensitive chemical papers and plates (Bain, Edison), of stimulating auric emissions from elements and chemicals (Reichenbach), of marking photographic plates (Dobler), of stimulating plant growth (White), of vivifying otherwise incapacitated patients (Abrams), of impressing and modifying sensitive crystallization processes (Kolisko), is able to seek and reveal deeply buried ore bodies (Drown, Rogers), and is capable of more astounding displays. Its preeminent potentials dwarf those achieved through the use of electrical charge.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demonstrating a distinct bioaffinity, geomantic currents evidence selective preference for biological matter and for bioorganisms (White, Abrams, Lahovsky). Possessing articulate &amp;amp;quot;behavior&amp;amp;quot;, whose definition exceeds that crude behavior of electrical currents, geomantic currents are able to selectively seek and locate specific widely distributed tuning targets with complete precision. Non-inertial, and characterized by innate properties which may only be termed &amp;amp;quot;biological&amp;amp;quot;, geomantic currents represent an energetic stratum at the most fundamental level. The world foundation. Was it any wonder that ground antennas performed in excess of all the electrodynamic predictions? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==RADIONIC GROUND ENTUNEMENT== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Discovered during the years when the communications sciences of Telegraphy, Telephony, Conduction Wireless, and Aerial Wireless were being developed, the isolation and implementation of Geomantic Energy has founded the core of a new Science. Having thoroughly accepted the objective existence of Geomantic Currents, the Radionists extended the known list of attributes and potentials germane to these energetic species. Radionists developed instruments, methods, and technologies beyond the expected conventional limits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Their diagnostic instruments become recognized as  &amp;amp;quot;tuners&amp;amp;quot; or &amp;amp;quot;filters&amp;amp;quot; of the geomantic currents. With refined entunement components, the effects became more pronounced and defined. The now familiar use of resistance or capacitance bridges in Radionic Technology has not been significantly changed since the days of telegraph line diagnostic instruments. Considered to be &amp;amp;quot;electrically dead&amp;amp;quot; by other academes, and therefore supposedly incapable of dynamic activity, the diagnostic apparatus of Radionists were derided by those who refused the acceptance of vitalistic energy on conditions of personal prejudice alone. But the natural phenomenon defied the edicts of those who refused to know. Radionically entuned radio receivers became enormously powerful sites into which impossibly distant signals of exceedingly weak intensities simply pour. To experience the numerous phenomena typical for reception through ground antennas is to experience the technically &amp;amp;quot;impossible&amp;amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Utilized in a great variety of investigative purposes, the acquisition of geomantic energies was fortunately chronicled in a great number of patents and articles. Radionists discovered that Geomantic energy is neutral, being possessed of an ability to modify and organize chemically chaotic systems (Littlefield, Morley-Martin, Kolisko). Pure geomantic energy articulates and transforms mineral solutions into prebiological organizations (Crosse, Bastian, Reich). The characteristic which draws geomantic currents into bioorganisms has been explored for use as a therapeutic stimulant (White, Drown). Greatly increased vitality is the result of exposures to these ground derived currents, an echoing reminder of truths early discovered by Mesmer and Galvani.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ground derived energies were used in demonstration of agricultural stimulation (White, Lakhovsky), sensitive medical diagnosis (White, Abrams, Hieronymus), medical therapies (White, Mellon, Drown), anatomical scanning (Drown, DelaWarr), wireless biological communications (Abrams, Hieronymus, Drown), chemical reactivity (Kolisko), power acquisition (Stubblefield, Strong, Brown, Tomkins, Lockwood, Prentice), meteorological modification (Baigorri), remote sensing and surveying (Beasse, Glazewski, Billington, Ash, Rogers, Moray, Maby, Drown), and mineral prospecting (Beasse, Rogers, Drown). Despite these profound discoveries, the widescale acceptance of geomantic energy or geomantic phenomena was methodically shunned and eliminated from the academic dogma. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the vindictive treatment, that displayed in the purgative fury of several national agencies, the legendary Radionists developed a wondrous new technology which yet holds the future survival of humanity. This superlative Radionic Technology, capable of stimulating and engaging the very deepest of human potentials, has neither been glimpsed or considered since Medieval times. In the secrets of Radionic Science are the means by which the very deepest dreams and desires of humanity find technological expression. Implementing pure geomantic energies, Radionic Instrumentalities operate at the very level from which dreams and desires emerge.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the energies obtained up from the ground, we have discovered a sequence of distinct, irreducible, and articulate attributes, to which both our thoughts and efforts have been continually directed. The all too numerous experiments which Borderland Sciences researchers have conducted remain forever framed in this biodynamic perspective. With each attempt at duplicating the supposed fraudulent claims of our qualitatively inclined predecessors, we continue to rediscover spectacular anomalies. Providing us with a continual stream of scientific epiphanies, we have enjoyed remarkable success. Moving in and among such strange scientific topics, you may also venture among deep roadways untravelled by most. In truth, these deepest of studies prove the existence of a superlative visionary world-reality, one whose thralldom society must again admit. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Coupled with the most elementary of ground antennas, any ordinary shortwave receiver becomes a powerful diagnostic tool. With very simple equipment, one obtains a glowing window on the innermost world processes whose biodynamic activities rule our very being. The diagnostic use of ground radio antennas, has permitted the acquisition of wonderful and mind-elevating secrets. One continually learns the lost details inherent in our throbbing world. The geomantic structure, whose pulsing streams and ebbing tides govern our consciousness, is suddenly revealed through the turn of a radio dial. Unreconciled audio &amp;amp;quot;observations&amp;amp;quot; provide compelling evidence that ours is a world alive, whose meandering flowlines display both emotive reactions and intelligent behavior. Careful interpretation of ground radio phenomena has permitted us to add new details to the evergrowing biodynamic world thesis. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indeed, with every experiment we have performed, there is a vast and oceanic flood of new facts and equally new associations. It is with these revelations we find ourselves wonderfully occupied. Now comprising a formidable and growing treasury, we recognize that the duplication of such past methodologies well serves our willingness to seek. Ground-connected shortwave receivers are radionic interaction chambers, where pure geomantic power meets with electricity. Employing the receiver components as surreptitious radionic instruments, we have found an astounding sequence of corroborative facts in a singular theme.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==BIBLIOGRAPHY== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(VC denotes VRIL COMPENDIUM -- All patents are contained in the Compendium) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Ader, Clement. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 377,879 (February 14, 1888) (VC 3). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Anderson, Leland. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Tesla Lecture Before the New York Academy of Sciences: April 1897.&amp;amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Appleton (and Barnett). &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Signal Deviation in Transmission&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Royal Society&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 109 A, p. 621, 1925. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Appleton, Dr. E. V. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Shortwave Signals&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Cambridge Philosophical Society&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 23, p. 155, 1926. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Retardation of Short Wave Signals&amp;amp;quot;, Wheatstone Laboratory, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Nature&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 122, 8 December 1928 &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Austin, L. W. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Radiotelegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Bureau of Standards, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Journal Washington Academy of Sciences&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vol 16, pp 398-410: August 1926. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Radiotelegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Bureau of Standards, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Journal Washington Academy of Sciences&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vol 16, pp. 457-460: October 1926. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Braun, Ferdinand. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Signals Over Surfaces&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 750.429, (January 26, 1904) (VC 8 Ground Radio). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Baigorri.&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &amp;amp;quot;The Rain Wizard&amp;amp;quot;, Jorge Resines (Translator), &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Borderlands&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, No. 4, 1993. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Bain, Alexander (with R. Smith). &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Automatic Telegraph&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 6837 (October 30, 1849). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Bear, Simeon. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Telegraphic Circuit&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 192,856 (July 10, 1877). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Breit (and Tuve). &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Signals And Transmission Paths&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Physical Review&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 28, p. 554, 1926. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Brown, John. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Magneto-Electric Signalling Apparatus&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 238,212 (March 1, 1881). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Bryan, James C. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Earth Battery&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 160,152 (February 23, 1875). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Cerpaux, Jules. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Electric Piles&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 182,802 (October 3, 1876). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Charpentier, Louis. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The Mystery Of Chartres Cathedral&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Avon Books, New York, 1975. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Crosse, Andrew. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Andrew Crosse&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Scientific American&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, December 18, 1869, p. 386. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;The Morley-Martin Experiments&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;amp;quot;Crosse&amp;amp;#146;s Acari&amp;amp;quot;, p. 18-21, Borderland Sciences Research Foundation Reprint, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Crosse&amp;amp;#146;s Acari&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Borderlands&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, p. 32, Number 3, 1996. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Dieckmann, George F. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Electric Earth Battery&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 329,724 (November 3, 1885). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Dolbear, Dr. Amos. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Mode of Electric Communication&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 350.299, (October 5, 1886). (Dolbear newspaper articles in VC 7 Dendritic Ground Systems) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Dollard, Eric. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Dielectric and Magnetic Discharges&amp;amp;quot;, Borderlands Publications, 1985 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Generalized Electric Wave&amp;amp;quot;, Borderlands Publications, 1986 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Tesla Transformers&amp;amp;quot;, Borderlands Publications, 1985 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Theory of Wireless Power&amp;amp;quot;, Borderlands Publications, 1986 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Tesla&amp;amp;#146;s Longitudinal Electricity&amp;amp;quot;, Borderland Sciences Video, 1985 &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Farmer, Moses. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Method of Sending And Receiving Messages Simultaneously Over the Same Wire&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 6,296, (February 16, 1875). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Frow, William. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Means For Transmission of Intelligence&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,016,003 (June 30, 1912). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Heising, Raymond. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Directive Radio Transmissive System&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,562,961 (November 24, 1925). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Oscillation Generator&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,240,206 (September 18, 1917). (VC 11 ELF Devices) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Highton, Henry. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Telegraphing Long Distances&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;London Society of Arts&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1872, (Biographic Sketch from &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Pioneers of Wireless&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Ellison Hawks), (VC 8 Ground Radio). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Hollingworth. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Longwave Signals&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Institute of Electrical Engineers&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; 64, p. 579, 1926. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Littlefield, Charles W. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Bio-Genesis&amp;amp;quot; (extract from &amp;amp;quot;The Beginning And Way of Life&amp;amp;quot;, 1919), Borderland Sciences Research Foundation Reprint, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Lockwood, Robert and William. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Transmitter For Telephones&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 239,519 (March 29, 1881). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Loomis, Mahlon. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Improvements In Telegraphing&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 129,971 (July 30, 1872) (Personal Papers and Drawings, Government Documentation, Historical accounts), (VC 7 Dendritic Ground Systems) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Lugo, Orazio. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Electric Telegraphs&amp;amp;quot; Patent 235,159 (7 December 1880). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Marconi, Marquese Guglielmo. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Directional Radiation of Waves&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Royal Society&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, March 1906. (VC 10 Ray Transmitters) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Transmitting Electrical Signals&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 586,193 (July 13, 1897). (Biography), (VC 9 Aerial Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Variations of VLF Signals&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Royal Society&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Volume 77, June 1906. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Meissner, Alexander. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Oscillations By Shock Excitation&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,007,733 (November 4, 1913). (VC 9 Aerial Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Directional Antenna System&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,740,950 (December 24, 1929). (VC 11 ELF Devices) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Mellon, John. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Electro-Therapeutic Appliance&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 412,196 (October 1, 1889). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Morley-Martin. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;The Morley-Martin Experiments&amp;amp;quot;, Borderland Sciences Research Foundation Reprint, 1986. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Morse, Samuel. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Conducting Power and Galvanic Power of The Earth&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Silliman&amp;amp;#146;s Journal&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Volume 35, 1839, pp. 253-267. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Mode of Crossing Broad Rivers&amp;amp;quot;, Dr. Morse, Letter to House of Representatives, 23 December 1824. (all accounts collected in VC 2 Telegraphy) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Muirhead, John. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Condensing Resistance for Electric Telegraphs&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 208,665 (October 1, 1878). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Murgas, Fr. Josef. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Constructing Antennas&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 860,051 (July 16, 1907). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Wireless Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 915,993 (March 23 ,1909). (Biography and Patents), (VC 8 Ground Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Ground Telegraphy in War&amp;amp;quot;, H. Gernsback, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Radiation And Reception With Buried Antenna&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;IEEE&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; AP-11, Number 3, pp. 207-218 (Relates Murgas to PANGLOSS). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Subsurface Radio Propagation Experiments&amp;amp;quot;, Tsao and deBettencourt, Raytheon Company, 1965, (VC 11 Military ELF). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Musits, Sigmund. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Apparatus For Wireless Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 777,216 (December 13 , 1904). (VC 8 Ground Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Preece, Sir William. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Recent Progress In Telephony&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;British Association Reports&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1882. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Electrical Induction Between Wires&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;British Association Reports&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1886. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Signalling Through Space Without Wires&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proc. Royal Inst. London&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1897. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Aetheric Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Society of Arts&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 3 May 1899. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Aetheric Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Inst. Electrical Engineers&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 22 December 1898. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Aetheric Wireless Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proc. Inst. Electrical Engineers London&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1898. (Collections VC 8 Ground Radio), (Collections VC 9 Aerial Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Prentice, Frank Wyatt. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Wireless Train Control System&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 843,550. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Electrical Power Accumulators&amp;amp;quot;, Certified description (Private publication September 18, 1923), will be available through BSRF. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Quack. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Zeitschrifft fur Hochfrequenztechnik&amp;amp;quot; 30 (2), p. 41, 1928. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Rogers, Mr. and Mrs. Stanley A. Harris. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Radiology In The Field Of Mineral Deposits&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Journal of The Electronic Research Association&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Missouri, 1932 (VC 4). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Rogers, James Harris. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;America&amp;amp;#146;s Greatest War Invention&amp;amp;quot;, H. W. Secor, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1919. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Ground Wires and Shortwaves&amp;amp;quot;, Lieut. Comm. H. A. Taylor, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Proceedings Institute Radio Engineers&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Vol. 7 (4), 1919. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Longwaves and Strays on Rogers Antennae&amp;amp;quot;, Lieut. Comm. A. H. Taylor, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1920. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Radiosignaling System&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,303,730 (May 13, 1919). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Submarine Signaling System&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,395,454 (November 4, 1921). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Submarine Wireless&amp;amp;quot;, P. R. Coursey, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Wireless World&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 27 November 1920. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;The Rogers Underground Aerial for Amateurs&amp;amp;quot;, J. H. Rogers, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1920. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Underground Wireless System&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, March 1919. (Patent Collection), (VC 8 Ground Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;SANGUINE/SEAFARER&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Earth Conduction Experiments&amp;amp;quot;, H. W. Dodge. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Finding Mines By Radio&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Popular Radio&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, September 1924, pp. 238-245. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Grounding System For New High Power Stations&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;The Marconigraph&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, September 1919, pp. 548-549. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Subterranean and Submarine Antennas&amp;amp;quot;, A. H. Taylor, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Institute Radio Engineers&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, August 1919. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Underground Radio Telegraph&amp;amp;quot;, S. R. Winters,  &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Popular Radio&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, May 1924, pp. 490-492. (Articles in VC 8 Ground Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;ELF Propagation Measurements Along A 4900 Kilometer Path&amp;amp;quot;, L. Ginsberg, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;IEEE&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, December 1973. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Wisconsin Test Facility&amp;amp;quot;, Bannister et al, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;IEEE&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, December 1973. (SANGUINE Article Collection in VC 11 ELF Devices) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Smith, Gerritt. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Duplex Telegraph&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 238,448 (March 1, 1881). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Snow, William. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Earth Batteries for Generating Electricity&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 155,209 (September 22, 1874). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Steinheil, C. A. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;On Telegraphy and Galvanic Craft&amp;amp;quot;, Munich, 1898. (Steinheil account taken from) &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;History of Wireless Telegraphy&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Fahy. (all accounts VC 2 Telegraphy) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Strong, Henry. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Relay Telephones&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 235,658 (December 21, 1880). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Squier, George. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Tree Telephony and Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,549,032 (August 11, 1925). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Tree Telephony and Telegraphy&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Journal of The Franklin Institute&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, June 1919. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Talking Through The Trees&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1919. &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Stubblefield, Nathan. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Electrical Battery&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 600,457, (March 8, 1898). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Stubblefield Personal Papers, Patents&amp;amp;quot;, (VC 4 Archeforms). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Earth Batteries&amp;amp;quot; (Patent Collection VC 4 Archeforms). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Taylor, Herbert (with Muirhead, Alexander). &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Telegraphic Accumulators and Condensers&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 206,366 (July 23, 1878). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;TELLURIC CURRENTS&amp;lt;/b&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Abnormal Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, Grandy, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Engineer&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, June 1892 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Auroral Disturbances&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Nature&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 29 April 1886 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, B. Grandy, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Engineer&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, March 1893 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, W. Finn, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Engineer&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, November 1892  &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, W. H. Preece, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Nature&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, April 1894 &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;On The Electrical Currents Of The Earth&amp;amp;quot;, Mateucci, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Smithsonian Institute.&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt; VC 1 White Ray Conductors) &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;How the Aurora Affects Telegraph Lines&amp;amp;quot;, H. Gernsback, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Experimenter&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, January 1918, (VC 1 White Ray Conductors). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Registering Apparatus for Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Science&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, June 1883. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Recent Observations on Earth Currents&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Electrical Engineer&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, August 1894. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Telegraphs, J. D. Caton, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Scientific American&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, September 1862  &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Terrestrial Electricity&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Nature&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1874. (All above taken from VC 1 White Ray Conductors) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Tesla, Nikola. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Transmitting Through Natural Mediums&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 787,412 (April 18, 1905). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Transmitting Electrical Energy&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,119,732 (December 1, 1914). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Tomkins, Cornelius. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Telephone Relay&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 238,459 (March 1, 1881). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Trowbridge, John. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;The Earth As A Conductor of Electricity&amp;amp;quot;, &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;American Academy of Sciences&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, 1880. (VC 9 Aerial Radio) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Vail, Alfred. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;(Diary Accounts: anomalous telegraphic currents, VC 3) &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;Von Arco, Count Georg. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;amp;quot;Aerial Conductor&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 959,100, (May 24, 1910), (VC 9 Aerial Radio). &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;amp;quot;Radiotelegraphic Station&amp;amp;quot;, Patent 1,082,221, (December 23, 1913). (VC 8 Ground Radio). &lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;lt;b&amp;gt;White, Dr. G. S. &amp;lt;/b&amp;gt;&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;Cosmo-ElectroCulture&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, Los Angeles, 1929. &lt;br /&gt;
**  &amp;lt;i&amp;gt;New Light On Therapeutic Energies&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;, M. L. Gallert, Borderland Sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
--&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00076_Avion_4.jpg&amp;diff=217</id>
		<title>File:A00076 Avion 4.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00076_Avion_4.jpg&amp;diff=217"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:58:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Exp1HeadPhones.jpg&amp;diff=216</id>
		<title>File:Exp1HeadPhones.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Exp1HeadPhones.jpg&amp;diff=216"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:57:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00044_Connexions.jpg&amp;diff=215</id>
		<title>File:A00044 Connexions.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00044_Connexions.jpg&amp;diff=215"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:57:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00040_SchemaBlock.jpg&amp;diff=214</id>
		<title>File:A00040 SchemaBlock.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00040_SchemaBlock.jpg&amp;diff=214"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:56:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Doc_LGV_ROTA_027.JPG&amp;diff=213</id>
		<title>File:Doc LGV ROTA 027.JPG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:Doc_LGV_ROTA_027.JPG&amp;diff=213"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:56:02Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00055_PatentRogersAndLyon2.jpg&amp;diff=212</id>
		<title>File:A00055 PatentRogersAndLyon2.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00055_PatentRogersAndLyon2.jpg&amp;diff=212"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:55:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:TEST2.SVG&amp;diff=211</id>
		<title>File:TEST2.SVG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:TEST2.SVG&amp;diff=211"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:55:15Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00087_2_NoteOnMedical.jpg&amp;diff=210</id>
		<title>File:A00087 2 NoteOnMedical.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://rota.cicadae.org/en/index.php?title=File:A00087_2_NoteOnMedical.jpg&amp;diff=210"/>
				<updated>2017-01-26T12:54:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;WikiSysopEn1: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiSysopEn1</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>